Formative research for the development of baby water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions for young children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (REDUCE program).
Care groups
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Infants
Qualitative methods
Water, sanitation, and hygiene
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2021
01 03 2021
Historique:
received:
11
06
2020
accepted:
14
01
2021
entrez:
2
3
2021
pubmed:
3
3
2021
medline:
22
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Research exploring the unique exposure pathways to fecal pathogens for young children and innovative water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions for susceptible pediatric populations is needed to reduce the burden of diarrheal diseases and stunting globally. The Reducing Enteropathy, Diarrhea, Undernutrition, and Contamination in the Environment (REDUCE) program seeks to 1) identify exposure pathways to fecal pathogens that are significant contributors to morbidity for young children in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and 2) develop and evaluate scalable interventions that reduce fecal contamination and exposure from these pathways. The formative research portion of the project sought to identify feasible and acceptable WASH interventions to modify behaviors found to be associated with diarrheal disease and impaired growth in our REDUCE cohort study. Ninety-one semi-structured interviews, 6 focus group discussions, and a pilot study of 102 households were conducted during 24 months of formative research. Thirty-one interviews and six focus group discussions were conducted with caregivers, community health workers, and village leaders to explore existing WASH practices and to identify barriers and facilitators to WASH behaviors. Findings were organized using the Integrated Behavioral Model for Water, Sanitation and Hygiene to facilitate interpretation and identify determinants to Baby WASH behaviors in this setting. Care Group modules and enabling technology were developed based on exploratory findings and then revised during a two-part, iterative pilot study. Sixty interviews were conducted with participants in a pilot study of the REDUCE Baby WASH Care Group modules to learn about their experiences with the intervention. Six REDUCE Baby WASH Care Group modules were developed based on formative research findings and covered the following topics: 1) living with animals; 2) child mouthing of fomites and feces; 3) composting animal feces; 4) child feces disposal; 5) handwashing with soap; and 6) water treatment. This study took a theory-driven and evidence-based approach to formative research and the development of the REDUCE Baby WASH Care Group modules. Intervention design focused on interrupting the exposure routes for infants and young children to fecal pathogens in the environment and promoting low-cost, low-burden Baby WASH behavioral recommendations and enabling technology. These developed REDUCE Baby WASH Care Group modules are currently being rolled out to over 1,000,000 beneficiaries in Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Research exploring the unique exposure pathways to fecal pathogens for young children and innovative water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions for susceptible pediatric populations is needed to reduce the burden of diarrheal diseases and stunting globally. The Reducing Enteropathy, Diarrhea, Undernutrition, and Contamination in the Environment (REDUCE) program seeks to 1) identify exposure pathways to fecal pathogens that are significant contributors to morbidity for young children in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and 2) develop and evaluate scalable interventions that reduce fecal contamination and exposure from these pathways. The formative research portion of the project sought to identify feasible and acceptable WASH interventions to modify behaviors found to be associated with diarrheal disease and impaired growth in our REDUCE cohort study.
METHODS
Ninety-one semi-structured interviews, 6 focus group discussions, and a pilot study of 102 households were conducted during 24 months of formative research. Thirty-one interviews and six focus group discussions were conducted with caregivers, community health workers, and village leaders to explore existing WASH practices and to identify barriers and facilitators to WASH behaviors. Findings were organized using the Integrated Behavioral Model for Water, Sanitation and Hygiene to facilitate interpretation and identify determinants to Baby WASH behaviors in this setting. Care Group modules and enabling technology were developed based on exploratory findings and then revised during a two-part, iterative pilot study. Sixty interviews were conducted with participants in a pilot study of the REDUCE Baby WASH Care Group modules to learn about their experiences with the intervention.
RESULTS
Six REDUCE Baby WASH Care Group modules were developed based on formative research findings and covered the following topics: 1) living with animals; 2) child mouthing of fomites and feces; 3) composting animal feces; 4) child feces disposal; 5) handwashing with soap; and 6) water treatment.
CONCLUSION
This study took a theory-driven and evidence-based approach to formative research and the development of the REDUCE Baby WASH Care Group modules. Intervention design focused on interrupting the exposure routes for infants and young children to fecal pathogens in the environment and promoting low-cost, low-burden Baby WASH behavioral recommendations and enabling technology. These developed REDUCE Baby WASH Care Group modules are currently being rolled out to over 1,000,000 beneficiaries in Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33648466
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10246-5
pii: 10.1186/s12889-021-10246-5
pmc: PMC7923459
doi:
Substances chimiques
Water
059QF0KO0R
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
427Références
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 30;3(8):e003476
pubmed: 23996605
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 02;15:835
pubmed: 26329824
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Aug;7(8):e1139-e1146
pubmed: 31303300
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 29;17(9):
pubmed: 32365476
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Mar;94(3):553-62
pubmed: 26787149
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Feb 3;6:10
pubmed: 32042436
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Aug;93(2):269-75
pubmed: 26055734
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 May;102(5):1094-1103
pubmed: 32124727
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Aug;75(4):612-21
pubmed: 22541798
Nutr Rev. 2019 Apr 1;77(4):240-253
pubmed: 30753710
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Jun;22(6):670-678
pubmed: 28319300
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 24;15(2):
pubmed: 29364184
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Aug;99(2):513-525
pubmed: 29869596
J Health Psychol. 2014 Dec;19(12):1483-98
pubmed: 23864069
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Nov;101(5):984-993
pubmed: 31549607
J Pediatr. 2021 Jan;228:110-116.e1
pubmed: 32918918
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Mar;6(3):e316-e329
pubmed: 29396219
Nutr Rev. 2008 Sep;66(9):487-505
pubmed: 18752473
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013 Oct;89(4):709-16
pubmed: 24002485
BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 26;13:1015
pubmed: 24160869
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013 Jul;89(1):130-137
pubmed: 23629931
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Oct 17;51(20):11537-11552
pubmed: 28926696
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Mar;6(3):e302-e315
pubmed: 29396217
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Jun;92(6):1117-24
pubmed: 25918214
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jan;7(1):e132-e147
pubmed: 30554749
Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Jan;23(1):26-33
pubmed: 29121442