Steps toward preregistration of research on research integrity.

Open Science framework Paper and poster presenters Preregistration Registry for research on the responsible conduct of research Responsible conduct of research Study protocol World conference on research integrity

Journal

Research integrity and peer review
ISSN: 2058-8615
Titre abrégé: Res Integr Peer Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676020

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 24 03 2020
accepted: 08 02 2021
entrez: 2 3 2021
pubmed: 3 3 2021
medline: 3 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A proposal to encourage the preregistration of research on research integrity was developed and adopted as the Amsterdam Agenda at the 5th World Conference on Research Integrity (Amsterdam, 2017). This paper reports on the degree to which abstracts of the 6th World Conference in Research Integrity (Hong Kong, 2019) reported on preregistered research. Conference registration data on participants presenting a paper or a poster at 6th WCRI were made available to the research team. Because the data set was too small for inferential statistics this report is limited to a basic description of results and some recommendations that should be considered when taking further steps to improve preregistration. 19% of the 308 presenters preregistered their research. Of the 56 usable cases, less than half provided information on the six key elements of the Amsterdam Agenda. Others provided information that invalidated their data, such as an uninformative URL. There was no discernable difference between qualitative and quantitative research. Some presenters at the WCRI have preregistered their research on research integrity, but further steps are needed to increase frequency and completeness of preregistration. One approach to increase preregistration would be to make it a requirement for research presented at the World Conferences on Research Integrity.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
A proposal to encourage the preregistration of research on research integrity was developed and adopted as the Amsterdam Agenda at the 5th World Conference on Research Integrity (Amsterdam, 2017). This paper reports on the degree to which abstracts of the 6th World Conference in Research Integrity (Hong Kong, 2019) reported on preregistered research.
METHODS METHODS
Conference registration data on participants presenting a paper or a poster at 6th WCRI were made available to the research team. Because the data set was too small for inferential statistics this report is limited to a basic description of results and some recommendations that should be considered when taking further steps to improve preregistration.
RESULTS RESULTS
19% of the 308 presenters preregistered their research. Of the 56 usable cases, less than half provided information on the six key elements of the Amsterdam Agenda. Others provided information that invalidated their data, such as an uninformative URL. There was no discernable difference between qualitative and quantitative research.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Some presenters at the WCRI have preregistered their research on research integrity, but further steps are needed to increase frequency and completeness of preregistration. One approach to increase preregistration would be to make it a requirement for research presented at the World Conferences on Research Integrity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33648609
doi: 10.1186/s41073-021-00108-4
pii: 10.1186/s41073-021-00108-4
pmc: PMC7923522
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

5

Références

Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716
pubmed: 26315443
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 25;7:1832
pubmed: 27933012
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1998;2(3):196-217
pubmed: 15647155
F1000Res. 2019 Mar 12;8:280
pubmed: 31497290
PeerJ. 2019 Jan 16;7:e6232
pubmed: 30671302
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 16;13(7):e0200303
pubmed: 30011289
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 May 1;179(5):624-632
pubmed: 30855655
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124
pubmed: 16060722
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):632-8
pubmed: 26168122
Addiction. 2015 Jan;110(1):10-1
pubmed: 25515826
PLoS Biol. 2019 May 1;17(5):e3000246
pubmed: 31042704
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2600-2606
pubmed: 29531091

Auteurs

Klaas Sijtsma (K)

Department of Methodology and Statistics, TSB, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands. k.sijtsma@uvt.nl.

Wilco H M Emons (WHM)

Cito, P.O. Box 1034, 6801 MG, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Nicholas H Steneck (NH)

Professor Emeritus of History, University of Michigan, 127 Grandview Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA.

Lex M Bouter (LM)

Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH