Optimism and pasture access in dairy cows.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2021
01 03 2021
Historique:
received:
08
12
2020
accepted:
16
02
2021
entrez:
2
3
2021
pubmed:
3
3
2021
medline:
3
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Allowing dairy cattle to access pasture can promote natural behaviour and improve their health. However, the psychological benefits are poorly understood. We compared a cognitive indicator of emotion in cattle either with or without pasture access. In a crossover experiment, 29 Holstein-Friesian dairy cows had 18 days of overnight pasture access and 18 days of full-time indoor housing. To assess emotional wellbeing, we tested cows on a spatial judgement bias task. Subjects learnt to approach a rewarded bucket location, but not approach another, unrewarded bucket location. We then presented cows with three "probe" buckets intermediate between the trained locations. Approaching the probes reflected an expectation of reward under ambiguity-an "optimistic" judgement bias, suggesting positive emotional states. We analysed the data using linear mixed-effects models. There were no treatment differences in latency to approach the probe buckets, but cows approached the known rewarded bucket slower when they had pasture access than when they were indoors full-time. Our results indicate that, compared to cattle housed indoors, cattle with pasture access display less anticipatory behaviour towards a known reward. This reduced reward anticipation suggests that pasture is a more rewarding environment, which may induce more positive emotional states than full-time housing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33649476
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84371-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-84371-x
pmc: PMC7921385
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4882Subventions
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 851145
Pays : International
Références
Ellis, K. A., Billington, K., McNeil, B. & McKeegan, D. E. F. Public opinion on UK milk marketing and dairy cow welfare. Anim. Welf. 18(3), 267–282 (2009).
doi: 10.1017/S096272860000052X
Weinrich, R., Kühl, S., Zühlsdorf, A. & Spiller, A. Consumer attitudes in Germany towards different dairy housing systems and their implications for the marketing of pasture raised milk. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 17(20), 205–222 (2014).
Schuppli, C. A., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. & Weary, D. M. Access to pasture for dairy cows: Responses from an online engagement. J. Anim. Sci. 92(11), 5185–5192 (2014).
pubmed: 25261215
doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7725
Hötzel, M. J., Cardoso, C. S., Roslindo, A. & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. Citizens’ views on the practices of zero-grazing and cow-calf separation in the dairy industry: Does providing information increase acceptability?. J. Dairy Sci. 100(5), 4150–4160 (2017).
pubmed: 28259414
doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11933
Cardoso, C. S., Hötzel, M. J., Weary, D. M., Robbins, J. A. & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. Imagining the ideal dairy farm. J. Dairy Sci. 99(2), 1663–1671 (2016).
pubmed: 26709190
doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9925
Robbins, J. A., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., Fraser, D. & Weary, D. M. Invited review: Farm size and animal welfare. J. Anim. Sci. 94(12), 5439–5455 (2016).
pubmed: 28046157
doi: 10.2527/jas.2016-0805
Van den Pol-van Dasselaar, A., Hennessy, D. & Isselstein, J. Grazing of dairy cows in Europe—an in-depth analysis based on the perception of grassland experts. Sustainability 12(3), 1098 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/su12031098
USDA. Dairy Cattle Management Practices in the United States, 2014. www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/dairy/downloads/dairy14/Dairy14_dr_PartI.pdf (2016).
Jordbruksverket. Statens Jordbruksverks Författningssamling Saknr L., 106. http://www.jordbruksverket.se/download/18.229ea55815233ba0390e8c59/1452694447806/Landsbygdsprogrammet$+$2014-2020.pdf (2017).
EFSA. Scientific opinion on welfare of dairy cows in relation to behaviour, fear and pain based on a risk assessment with special reference to the impact of housing, feeding, management and genetic selection. EFSA J. 7, 1139 (2009).
doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1139
Charlton, G. L., Rutter, S. M., East, M. & Sinclair, L. A. Effects of providing total mixed rations indoors and on pasture on the behavior of lactating dairy cattle and their preference to be indoors or on pasture. J. Dairy Sci. 94(8), 3875–3884 (2011).
pubmed: 21787924
doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4172
Charlton, G. L., Rutter, S. M., East, M. & Sinclair, L. A. The motivation of dairy cows for access to pasture. J. Dairy Sci. 96(7), 4387–4396 (2013).
pubmed: 23664348
doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6421
Falk, A. C., Weary, D. M., Winckler, C. & Von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. Preference for pasture versus freestall housing by dairy cattle when stall availability indoors is reduced. J. Dairy Sci. 95(11), 6409–6415 (2012).
pubmed: 22959941
doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5208
Legrand, A. L., Von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. & Weary, D. M. Preference and usage of pasture versus free-stall housing by lactating dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 92(8), 3651–3658 (2009).
pubmed: 19620646
doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1733
Shepley, E., Bergeron, R. & Vasseur, E. Daytime summer access to pasture vs free-stall barn in dairy cows with year-long outdoor experience: A case study. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 192, 10–14 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.11.003
Motupalli, P. R., Sinclair, L. A., Charlton, G. L., Bleach, E. C. & Rutter, S. M. Preference and behavior of lactating dairy cows given free access to pasture at two herbage masses and two distances. J. Anim. Sci. 92(11), 5175–5184 (2014).
pubmed: 25349361
doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8046
Von Keyserlingk, M. A., Cestari, A. A., Franks, B., Fregonesi, J. A. & Weary, D. M. Dairy cows value access to pasture as highly as fresh feed. Sci. Rep. 7, 44953 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/srep44953
Tucker, C. B., Jensen, M. B., de Passillé, A. M., Hänninen, L. & Rushen, J. Invited review: Lying time and the welfare of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 104(1), 20–46 (2021).
pubmed: 33162094
doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-18074
Crump, A., Jenkins, K., Bethell, E. J., Ferris, C. P. & Arnott, G. Pasture access affects behavioral indicators of wellbeing in dairy cows. Animals 9(11), 902 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/ani9110902
pmcid: 6912433
Olmos, et al. Hoof disorders, locomotion ability and lying times of cubicle-housed compared to pasture-based dairy cows. Livest. Sci. 125(2–3), 199–207 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.04.009
der Tol, V. et al. Frictional forces required for unrestrained locomotion in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 88(2), 615–624 (2005).
pubmed: 15653528
doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72725-9
Haskell, M. J., Rennie, L. J., Bowell, V. A., Bell, M. J. & Lawrence, A. B. Housing system, milk production, and zero-grazing effects on lameness and leg injury in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 89(11), 4259–4266 (2006).
pubmed: 17033013
doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72472-9
Goldberg, et al. The influence of intensively managed rotational grazing, traditional continuous grazing, and confinement housing on bulk tank milk quality and udder health. J. Dairy Sci. 75(1), 96–104 (1992).
pubmed: 1541747
doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77743-1
Washburn, S. P., White, S. L., Green, J. T. Jr. & Benson, G. A. Reproduction, mastitis, and body condition of seasonally calved Holstein and Jersey cows in confinement or pasture systems. J. Dairy Sci. 85(1), 105–111 (2002).
pubmed: 11860102
doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74058-7
Miller, K. & Wood-Gush, D. G. M. Some effects of housing on the social behaviour of dairy cows. Anim. Sci. 53(3), 271–278 (1991).
doi: 10.1017/S0003356100020262
Van Iaer, E., Moons, C. P. H., Sonck, B. & Tuyttens, F. A. M. Importance of outdoor shelter for cattle in temperate climates. Livest. Sci. 159, 87–101 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.11.003
Charlier, J., Claerebout, E., De Mûelenaere, E. & Vercruysse, J. Associations between dairy herd management factors and bulk tank milk antibody levels against Ostertagia ostertagi. Vet. Parasitol. 133(1), 91–100 (2005).
pubmed: 15964688
doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.05.030
Kolver, E. S. & Muller, L. D. Performance and nutrient intake of high producing Holstein cows consuming pasture or a total mixed ration. J. Dairy Sci. 81(5), 1403–1411 (1998).
pubmed: 9621244
doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75704-2
Arnott, G., Ferris, C. P. & O’Connell, N. E. Welfare of dairy cows in continuously housed and pasture-based production systems. Animal 11(2), 261–273 (2017).
pubmed: 27364762
doi: 10.1017/S1751731116001336
Charlton, G. L. & Rutter, S. M. The behaviour of housed dairy cattle with and without pasture access: A review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 192, 2–9 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.05.015
Mee, J. F. & Boyle, L. A. Assessing whether dairy cow welfare is “better” in pasture-based than in confinement-based management systems. N. Z. Vet. J. 68(3), 168–177 (2020).
pubmed: 31973680
doi: 10.1080/00480169.2020.1721034
Smid, A. M. C., Weary, D. M. & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. The influence of different types of outdoor access on dairy cattle behavior. Front. Vet. Sci. 7, 257 (2020).
pubmed: 32478110
pmcid: 7238891
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00257
Boissy, et al. Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiol. Behav. 92(3), 375–397 (2007).
pubmed: 17428510
doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003
Fraser, D. & Duncan, I. J. ‘Pleasures’, ‘pains’ and animal welfare: Toward a natural history of affect. Anim. Welf. 7, 383–396 (1998).
doi: 10.1017/S0962728600020935
Spruijt, B. M., van den Bos, R. & Pijlman, F. T. A concept of welfare based on reward evaluating mechanisms in the brain: Anticipatory behaviour as an indicator for the state of reward systems. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 72(2), 145–171 (2001).
pubmed: 11278033
doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00204-5
Crump, et al. Emotion in animal contests. Proc. R. Soc. B. 287(1939), 20201715 (2020).
pubmed: 33203327
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1715
pmcid: 7116454
Ede, T., Lecorps, B., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. & Weary, D. M. Symposium review: Scientific assessment of affective states in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 102(11), 10677–10694 (2019).
pubmed: 31477285
doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16325
Kremer, L., Holkenborg, S. K., Reimert, I. S., Bolhuis, J. E. & Webb, L. E. The nuts and bolts of animal emotion. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 113, 273–286 (2020).
pubmed: 31982603
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.028
Mendl, M., Burman, O. H. & Paul, E. S. An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood. Proc. R. Soc. B. 277(1696), 2895–2904 (2010).
pubmed: 20685706
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0303
pmcid: 2982018
Russell, J. A. A circumplex model of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39(6), 1161 (1980).
doi: 10.1037/h0077714
Désiré, L., Boissy, A. & Veissier, I. Emotions in farm animals: A new approach to animal welfare in applied ethology. Behav. Processes. 60(2), 165–180 (2002).
pubmed: 12426068
doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00081-5
Crump, A., Arnott, G. & Bethell, E. J. Affect-driven attention biases as animal welfare indicators: Review and methods. Animals 8(8), 136 (2018).
doi: 10.3390/ani8080136
pmcid: 6115853
Mendl, M. & Paul, E. S. Animal affect and decision-making. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 112, 144–163 (2020).
pubmed: 31991192
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.025
Paul, E. S., Harding, E. J. & Mendl, M. Measuring emotional processes in animals: The utility of a cognitive approach. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 29(3), 469–491 (2005).
pubmed: 15820551
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.01.002
Blanchette, I. & Richards, A. The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Cogn. Emot. 24(4), 561–595 (2010).
doi: 10.1080/02699930903132496
Everaert, J., Podina, I. R. & Koster, E. H. A comprehensive meta-analysis of interpretation biases in depression. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 58, 33–48 (2017).
pubmed: 28974339
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.005
Hirsch, C. R., Meeten, F., Krahé, C. & Reeder, C. Resolving ambiguity in emotional disorders: The nature and role of interpretation biases. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 12, 281–305 (2016).
pubmed: 27019398
doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093436
Schoth, D. E. & Liossi, C. A systematic review of experimental paradigms for exploring biased interpretation of ambiguous information with emotional and neutral associations. Front. Psychol. 8, 171 (2017).
pubmed: 28232813
pmcid: 5299893
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00171
Stuijfzand, S., Creswell, C., Field, A. P., Pearcey, S. & Dodd, H. Research Review: Is anxiety associated with negative interpretations of ambiguity in children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 59(11), 1127–1142 (2018).
pubmed: 29052865
doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12822
Harding, E. J., Paul, E. S. & Mendl, M. Animal behaviour: Cognitive bias and affective state. Nature 427(6972), 312 (2004).
pubmed: 14737158
doi: 10.1038/427312a
Bethell, E. J. A “how-to” guide for designing judgment bias studies to assess captive animal welfare. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 18, S18–S42 (2015).
pubmed: 26440495
doi: 10.1080/10888705.2015.1075833
Lagisz, et al. Optimism, pessimism and judgement bias in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 118, 3–17 (2020).
pubmed: 32682742
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.012
Mendl, M., Burman, O. H., Parker, R. M. & Paul, E. S. Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 118(3), 161–181 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.023
Neville, et al. Pharmacological manipulations of judgement bias: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 108, 269–286 (2020).
pubmed: 31747552
pmcid: 6966323
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.008
Roelofs, S., Boleij, H., Nordquist, R. E. & van der Staay, F. J. Making decisions under ambiguity: Judgment bias tasks for assessing emotional state in animals. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 10, 119 (2016).
pubmed: 27375454
pmcid: 4899464
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00119
Burman, O. H. P., Parker, R., Paul, E. S. & Mendl, M. A spatial judgement task to determine background emotional state in laboratory rats, Rattus norvegicus. Anim. Behav. 76, 801–809 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.02.014
Baciadonna, L. & McElligott, A. G. The use of judgement bias to assess welfare in farm livestock. Anim. Welf. 24, 81–91 (2015).
doi: 10.7120/09627286.24.1.081
Neave, H. W., Daros, R. R., Costa, J. H., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. & Weary, D. M. Pain and pessimism: Dairy calves exhibit negative judgement bias following hot-iron disbudding. PLoS One 8(12), e80556 (2013).
pubmed: 24324609
pmcid: 3851165
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080556
Lecorps, B., Ludwig, B. R., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. & Weary, D. M. Pain-induced pessimism and anhedonia: Evidence from a novel probability-based judgment bias test. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 13, 20 (2019).
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00054
Daros, R. R., Costa, J. H., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., Hötzel, M. J. & Weary, D. M. Separation from the dam causes negative judgement bias in dairy calves. PLoS One 9(5), e98429 (2014).
pubmed: 24848635
pmcid: 4029834
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098429
Bučková, K., Špinka, M. & Hintze, S. Pair housing makes calves more optimistic. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 1–9 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56798-w
Henry, S., Fureix, C., Rowberry, R., Bateson, M. & Hausberger, M. Do horses with poor welfare show ‘pessimistic’ cognitive biases?. Sci. Nat. 104(1–2), 8 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00114-016-1429-1
Löckener, S., Reese, S., Erhard, M. & Wöhr, A. C. Pasturing in herds after housing in horseboxes induces a positive cognitive bias in horses. J. Vet. Behav. 11, 50–55 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2015.11.005
Crump, et al. Is the grass half-full? Investigating optimism as a welfare indicator for dairy cows with and without pasture-access. Pharmacol. Rep. 71(6), 1308 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2019.09.003
Doyle, et al. The effect of repeated testing on judgement biases in sheep. Behav. Processes 83(3), 349–352 (2010).
pubmed: 20117188
doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.01.019
Špinka, M. Social dimension of emotions and its implication for animal welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 138(3–4), 170–181 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.005
AHDB. Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board. https://dairy.ahdb.org.uk/resourceslibrary/technical-information/health-welfare/mobility-score-instructions/#.W2w3w9JKjIU (2020).
Hintze, et al. A cross-species judgement bias task: Integrating active trial initiation into a spatial Go/No-go task. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 5104 (2018).
pubmed: 29572529
pmcid: 5865189
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23459-3
Lecorps, B., Weary, D. M. & Keyserlingk, M. A. G. Pessimism and fearfulness in dairy calves. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 1421 (2018).
pubmed: 29362460
pmcid: 5780456
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17214-3
Webb, et al. What do calves choose to eat and how do preferences affect behaviour?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 161, 7–19 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.09.016
Bates, D. M., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4”. J. Stat. Softw. 67(1), 1–48 (2015).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Lenth, R. & Lenth, M. R. Package ‘lsmeans’. Am. Stat. 34(4), 216–221 (2018).
Gygax, L. The A to Z of statistics for testing cognitive judgement bias. Anim. Behav. 95, 59–69 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.06.013
Trimmer, P. C., Paul, E. S., Mendl, M. T., McNamara, J. M. & Houston, A. I. On the evolution and optimality of mood states. Behav. Sci. 3(3), 501–521 (2013).
pubmed: 25379252
doi: 10.3390/bs3030501
pmcid: 4217599
Anderson, M. H., Munafò, M. R. & Robinson, E. S. Investigating the psychopharmacology of cognitive affective bias in rats using an affective tone discrimination task. Psychopharmacology 226(3), 601–613 (2013).
pubmed: 23239131
doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2932-5
Seehuus, B., Mendl, M., Keeling, L. J. & Blokhuis, H. Disrupting motivational sequences in chicks: Are there affective consequences?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 148(1–2), 85–92 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.07.008
Burman, et al. Using judgement bias to measure positive affective state in dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 132(3–4), 160–168 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.04.001
Freymond, et al. Behaviour of horses in a judgment bias test associated with positive or negative reinforcement. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 158, 34–45 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.06.006
Verbeek, E., Ferguson, D. & Lee, C. Are hungry sheep more pessimistic? The effects of food restriction on cognitive bias and the involvement of ghrelin in its regulation. Physiol. Behav. 123, 67–75 (2014).
pubmed: 24096007
doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.09.017
Kilgour, R. J. In pursuit of “normal”: A review of the behaviour of cattle at pasture. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 138(1–2), 1–11 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.12.002
Van der Harst, J. E. & Spruijt, B. M. Tools to measure and improve animal welfare: Reward-related behaviour. Anim. Welf. 16, 67–73 (2007).
doi: 10.1017/S0962728600031742
Watters, J. V. & Krebs, B. L. Assessing and enhancing the welfare of animals with equivocal and reliable cues. Animals 9(9), 680 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/ani9090680
pmcid: 6770604
Anderson, C., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., Lidfors, L. M. & Weary, D. M. Anticipatory behaviour in animals: A critical review. Anim. Welf. 29(3), 231–238 (2020).
doi: 10.7120/09627286.29.3.231
Neave, H. W., Webster, J. R. & Zobel, G. Anticipatory behaviour as an indicator of the welfare of dairy calves in different housing environments. PLoS One 16(1), e0245742 (2021).
pubmed: 33471865
pmcid: 7816972
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245742
Van der Harst, J. E., Baars, A. M. & Spruijt, B. M. Standard housed rats are more sensitive to rewards than enriched housed rats as reflected by their anticipatory behaviour. Behav. Brain Res. 142(1–2), 151–156 (2003).
pubmed: 12798276
doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00403-5
Treadway, M. T. & Zald, D. H. Reconsidering anhedonia in depression: Lessons from translational neuroscience. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35(3), 537–555 (2011).
pubmed: 20603146
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.06.006
Clegg, I. L. & Delfour, F. Cognitive judgement bias is associated with frequency of anticipatory behavior in bottlenose dolphins. Zoo Biol. 37(2), 67–73 (2018).
pubmed: 29385270
doi: 10.1002/zoo.21400
Wichman, A., Keeling, L. J. & Forkman, B. Cognitive bias and anticipatory behaviour of laying hens housed in basic and enriched pens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 140(1–2), 62–69 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.05.006
Horváth, M., Pichová, K. & Košťál, Ľ. The effects of housing conditions on judgement bias in Japanese quail. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 185, 121–130 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.09.007
Carreras, et al. Housing conditions do not alter cognitive bias but affect serum cortisol, qualitative behaviour assessment and wounds on the carcass in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 185, 39–44 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.09.006
Ruet, et al. Effects of a temporary period on pasture on the welfare state of horses housed in individual boxes. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 105027, 20 (2020).
Anderson, D. J. & Adolphs, R. A framework for studying emotions across species. Cell 157(1), 187–200 (2014).
pubmed: 24679535
pmcid: 4098837
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.003
Hagen, K. & Broom, D. M. Emotional reactions to learning in cattle. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 85(3–4), 203–213 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2003.11.007
Manteuffel, G., Langbein, J. & Puppe, B. From operant learning to cognitive enrichment in farm animal housing: Bases and applicability. Anim. Welf. 18(1), 87–95 (2009).
doi: 10.1017/S0962728600000105
Meagher, R. K., Strazhnik, E., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. & Weary, D. M. Assessing the motivation to learn in cattle. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–7 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63848-1
Watters, J. V. Searching for behavioral indicators of welfare in zoos: Uncovering anticipatory behavior. Zoo Biol. 33(4), 251–256 (2014).
pubmed: 25042907
doi: 10.1002/zoo.21144