Effects of body mass index and range of motion on intraoperative change in pelvic tilt during total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach.
Accelerometer-based navigation system
Direct anterior approach
Pelvic tilt
Total hip Arthroplasty
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Mar 2021
02 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
16
12
2020
accepted:
15
02
2021
entrez:
3
3
2021
pubmed:
4
3
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Intraoperative pelvic tilt changes that occurs during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the supine position affects cup placement and sometimes causes malalignment. The relationship between body mass index (BMI) and pelvic movement has been reported for some procedures, but not the direct anterior approach (DAA). The purpose of this study was to investigate intraoperative pelvic tilt changes that occurs during DAA. In this single-center, retrospective study, we reviewed 200 hips that underwent primary THA via DAA in the supine position using an accelerometer-based navigation system. Intraoperative changes in pelvic tilt and axial rotation from the start of surgery to cup placement were assessed using the navigation system. Preoperative clinical factors that increased pelvic tilt and axial rotation toward the surgical side by > 10° were analyzed via univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses. The mean pelvic tilt value increased by 7.6° ± 3.8° (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1-8.2; range, - 5.0-19.0) intraoperatively, and the axial rotation increased by 3.2° ± 2.7° (95% CI, 2.7-3.7; range, - 13.0-12.0). Univariate analysis revealed that the group with increased pelvic tilt showed significantly greater range of abduction and internal rotation, and significantly lower BMI than the group with no increased tilt. Pre-incisional pelvic tilt was significantly greater in the group with increased axial rotation than in the group with no increased rotation. On logistic regression analysis, BMI (odds ratio [OR], 0.889; 95% CI, 0.809-0.977; p = 0.014) and the range of internal rotation (OR, 1.310; 95% CI, 1.002-1.061; p = 0.038) were predictors of large increases in pelvic tilt. No predictors of large increases in axial rotation were identified. Significant forward pelvic tilt was observed in patients with a low BMI values and high ranges of internal rotation via THA using the DAA. Findings indicated that surgeons should pay attention to intraoperative pelvic movements, which may help identify patients with significant pelvic tilt changes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Intraoperative pelvic tilt changes that occurs during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the supine position affects cup placement and sometimes causes malalignment. The relationship between body mass index (BMI) and pelvic movement has been reported for some procedures, but not the direct anterior approach (DAA). The purpose of this study was to investigate intraoperative pelvic tilt changes that occurs during DAA.
METHODS
METHODS
In this single-center, retrospective study, we reviewed 200 hips that underwent primary THA via DAA in the supine position using an accelerometer-based navigation system. Intraoperative changes in pelvic tilt and axial rotation from the start of surgery to cup placement were assessed using the navigation system. Preoperative clinical factors that increased pelvic tilt and axial rotation toward the surgical side by > 10° were analyzed via univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The mean pelvic tilt value increased by 7.6° ± 3.8° (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1-8.2; range, - 5.0-19.0) intraoperatively, and the axial rotation increased by 3.2° ± 2.7° (95% CI, 2.7-3.7; range, - 13.0-12.0). Univariate analysis revealed that the group with increased pelvic tilt showed significantly greater range of abduction and internal rotation, and significantly lower BMI than the group with no increased tilt. Pre-incisional pelvic tilt was significantly greater in the group with increased axial rotation than in the group with no increased rotation. On logistic regression analysis, BMI (odds ratio [OR], 0.889; 95% CI, 0.809-0.977; p = 0.014) and the range of internal rotation (OR, 1.310; 95% CI, 1.002-1.061; p = 0.038) were predictors of large increases in pelvic tilt. No predictors of large increases in axial rotation were identified.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Significant forward pelvic tilt was observed in patients with a low BMI values and high ranges of internal rotation via THA using the DAA. Findings indicated that surgeons should pay attention to intraoperative pelvic movements, which may help identify patients with significant pelvic tilt changes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33653316
doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04087-x
pii: 10.1186/s12891-021-04087-x
pmc: PMC7927233
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
240Références
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Sep;90(9):1143-51
pubmed: 18757952
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Feb;30(2):282-5
pubmed: 25304938
J Arthroplasty. 2013 May;28(5):849-54
pubmed: 23489731
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb;473(2):441-52
pubmed: 25091222
Arthroscopy. 2008 Feb;24(2):188-95
pubmed: 18237703
Int Orthop. 2020 Sep;44(9):1669-1676
pubmed: 32393990
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2762-2767
pubmed: 28522246
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Feb;31(2):506-11
pubmed: 26461487
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):325-335
pubmed: 29529664
Eur Spine J. 2007 Jun;16(6):749-58
pubmed: 16715308
Int Orthop. 2016 Sep;40(9):1813-9
pubmed: 26634579
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2466-2473
pubmed: 28438452
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Mar;30(3):419-34
pubmed: 25453632
J Orthop Sci. 2010 Nov;15(6):758-63
pubmed: 21116893
Bone Joint J. 2014 Jul;96-B(7):876-83
pubmed: 24986939
J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec;19(8):992-7
pubmed: 15586335
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A Suppl 4:56-63
pubmed: 14652394
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 6;101(3):250-256
pubmed: 30730484
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Sep;(426):174-9
pubmed: 15346070
Hip Int. 2020 Mar 3;:1120700020908788
pubmed: 32126836
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Mar;60(2):217-20
pubmed: 641088
J Orthop Sci. 2020 May;25(3):446-451
pubmed: 31174965
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2748-2754
pubmed: 28499624