Association of Patient Mental Health Status With the Level of Agreement Between Patient and Physician Ratings of Psoriasis Severity.


Journal

JAMA dermatology
ISSN: 2168-6084
Titre abrégé: JAMA Dermatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589530

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 04 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 4 3 2021
medline: 7 9 2021
entrez: 3 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The emerging paradigm of treat-to-target in psoriasis requires accurate monitoring of treatment response. The commonly used physician global assessment tool does not capture the patient's perception of their disease. Patient assessments facilitate shared decision-making and foster patient-centered care; however, recent research reports a discordance between patient- and physician-reported psoriasis severity. Understanding the factors underlying this discordance may improve treatment satisfaction and disease outcomes. To evaluate the discordance between patient- and physician-reported measures of psoriasis severity and assess the association with patient mental health status. A cohort study using repeated cross-sectional analysis of real-world longitudinal data was conducted at a large specialist psoriasis service serving London and Southeast England. A total of 502 patients attending the psoriasis service between May 12, 2016, and November 1, 2018, were included. Data analysis was conducted July 22 to October 22, 2019. Psoriasis severity was assessed on each visit with identical 5-point physician and patient global assessment scales (clear/nearly clear, mild, moderate, severe, and very severe). Each patient completed validated self-report screens for depression and anxiety on each visit. Longitudinal data from 502 individuals with psoriasis (1985 total observations) were available. A total of 339 patients (68%) were men, 396 (79%) were White, mean (SD) age was 47 (13) years, and 197 patients (39%) had concurrent psoriatic arthritis, 43 (9%) screened positive for depression, and 49 (10%) screened positive for anxiety. There was discordance between physician and patient measures of disease severity in 768 of 1985 office appointments (39%); on 511 visits (26%) patients rated their psoriasis as less severe and on 257 visits (13%) patients rated their psoriasis as more severe compared with their physician. Individuals who screened positive for depression or anxiety were more likely to overestimate their psoriasis severity compared with their physician (relative risk ratio: depression, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.6-4.5; anxiety, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.4). These findings remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, ethnicity, sex, body mass index, smoking, number of comorbidities, treatment modality, and presence of psoriatic arthritis. The findings of this cohort study suggest that discordance between patient and physician assessments of psoriasis severity is associated with patients' mental health status. Recognition of anxiety and depression in individuals with psoriasis appears to be important when interpreting patient-reported outcome measures and informing appropriate treatment decisions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33656512
pii: 2777011
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.5844
pmc: PMC7931137
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

413-420

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/T02383X/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Auteurs

Ewan Carr (E)

Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Satveer K Mahil (SK)

St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Anamaria Brailean (A)

Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Tejus Dasandi (T)

St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Andrew E Pink (AE)

St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Jonathan N Barker (JN)

St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Lauren Rayner (L)

Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Mark A Turner (MA)

St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Kimberley Goldsmith (K)

Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Catherine H Smith (CH)

St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH