Ethnicity, Immigration Status, And Driving Under The Influence Of Alcohol.

Alcohol-impaired driving Drink-driving Ethnicity Hazardous drinking Immigration status Psychological distress

Journal

Journal of ethnicity in substance abuse
ISSN: 1533-2659
Titre abrégé: J Ethn Subst Abuse
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101083217

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Mar 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 4 3 2021
medline: 4 3 2021
entrez: 3 3 2021
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Understanding risk factors for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUIA) informs development of effective interventions. This study examined the association between ethnicity, immigration status, and DUIA, exploring psychological distress and hazardous drinking as additional contributors. Data were derived from the 2003-2011 cycles of the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Monitor of 16,101 adults from Ontario, Canada. Hierarchical binary logistic regression analysis assessed self-identified ethnicity and immigration status as predictors of DUIA, adjusting for sociodemographics and driving exposure (Model 1), psychological distress (Model 2), and hazardous drinking (Model 3). In Model 1, respondents born outside of Canada had reduced odds of engaging in DUIA compared to those born in Canada (AOR = 0.72, 95%CI = 0.56 - 0.92). Relative to those identifying as Canadian, the odds of DUIA were significantly reduced for those identifying as East Asian (AOR = 0.28, 95%CI = 0.13 - 0.61) and South Asian (AOR = 0.52, 95%CI = 0.27 - 0.98). In Model 3, individuals who reported psychological distress (AOR = 1.69, 95%CI = 1.33 - 2.16) and those who reported hazardous drinking (AOR = 6.28, 95%CI= 5.13 - 7.69) were more likely to DUIA. Those identifying as East Asian continued to have reduced odds of DUIA compared to those identifying as Canadian (AOR = 0.38, 95%CI = 0.17 - 0.85). Individuals born outside of Canada were less likely to engage in DUIA than individuals born in Canada. Drivers who self-identified as East Asian were less likely to DUIA than those who self-identified as Canadian. Understanding ethnic differences underlying divergent risks for DUIA will improve prevention initiatives and remedial measures programming.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Understanding risk factors for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUIA) informs development of effective interventions. This study examined the association between ethnicity, immigration status, and DUIA, exploring psychological distress and hazardous drinking as additional contributors.
METHOD METHODS
Data were derived from the 2003-2011 cycles of the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Monitor of 16,101 adults from Ontario, Canada. Hierarchical binary logistic regression analysis assessed self-identified ethnicity and immigration status as predictors of DUIA, adjusting for sociodemographics and driving exposure (Model 1), psychological distress (Model 2), and hazardous drinking (Model 3).
RESULTS RESULTS
In Model 1, respondents born outside of Canada had reduced odds of engaging in DUIA compared to those born in Canada (AOR = 0.72, 95%CI = 0.56 - 0.92). Relative to those identifying as Canadian, the odds of DUIA were significantly reduced for those identifying as East Asian (AOR = 0.28, 95%CI = 0.13 - 0.61) and South Asian (AOR = 0.52, 95%CI = 0.27 - 0.98). In Model 3, individuals who reported psychological distress (AOR = 1.69, 95%CI = 1.33 - 2.16) and those who reported hazardous drinking (AOR = 6.28, 95%CI= 5.13 - 7.69) were more likely to DUIA. Those identifying as East Asian continued to have reduced odds of DUIA compared to those identifying as Canadian (AOR = 0.38, 95%CI = 0.17 - 0.85).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Individuals born outside of Canada were less likely to engage in DUIA than individuals born in Canada. Drivers who self-identified as East Asian were less likely to DUIA than those who self-identified as Canadian. Understanding ethnic differences underlying divergent risks for DUIA will improve prevention initiatives and remedial measures programming.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33656975
doi: 10.1080/15332640.2021.1885550
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-17

Auteurs

Thao Lan Le (TL)

Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Andrew Tuck (A)

Health Equity, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Branka Agic (B)

Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Anca R Ialomiteanu (AR)

Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

André J McDonald (AJ)

Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Robert E Mann (RE)

Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Christine M Wickens (CM)

Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute of Mental Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Classifications MeSH