Measuring psychological capital: Revision of the Compound Psychological Capital Scale (CPC-12).


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 17 07 2020
accepted: 02 02 2021
entrez: 3 3 2021
pubmed: 4 3 2021
medline: 31 8 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This article provides information about the psychometric limitations of the original Compound Psychological Capital Scale (CPC-12) and suggests a revised version CPC-12R, a free-to-use measure of Psychological Capital. The investigation consisted of three studies: two of these identified psychometric limitations of the original scale, and the third presented the revised version of the scale. The first study did not confirm the hypothesized four-factor structure of the CPC-12 on a sample of Czech teachers (n = 282) and found psychometric limitations in the resilience subscale. The second study identified the same problem using secondary analyses of the original data from two samples of German employees (n = 202 and 321 respectively). The third study proposed a revised version of the scale with new items for resilience, and provided support for reliability and factorial validity of the new CPC-12R on a sample of Czech employees (n = 333). CPC-12R demonstrated a better fit to the theoretically supported model of Psychological Capital than CPC-12, and further displays adequate psychometric properties to be recommended for application in both research and practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33657134
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247114
pii: PONE-D-20-21923
pmc: PMC8508554
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0247114

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Feb 04;9:8
pubmed: 21294858
Health Psychol. 1985;4(3):219-47
pubmed: 4029106
J Vocat Behav. 2018 Apr;105:159-172
pubmed: 29615827
J Nurs Meas. 1993 Winter;1(2):165-78
pubmed: 7850498
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):5-14
pubmed: 11392865
Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82
pubmed: 12964174
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2003;12(2):65-76
pubmed: 12830300
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 01;11(4):e0152892
pubmed: 27035437
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1987 Jul;57(3):316-331
pubmed: 3303954
J Pers Assess. 2018 Sep-Oct;100(5):551-562
pubmed: 29927679
Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194-200
pubmed: 18696313
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Feb;70(2):321-35
pubmed: 8636885
J Appl Psychol. 1998 Dec;83(6):835-52
pubmed: 9885197

Auteurs

Ludmila Dudasova (L)

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Jakub Prochazka (J)

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Department of Corporate Economy, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Martin Vaculik (M)

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Timo Lorenz (T)

Department of Psychology, Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH