Molecular correlates of response to nivolumab at baseline and on treatment in patients with RCC.


Journal

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2021
Historique:
accepted: 30 11 2020
entrez: 4 3 2021
pubmed: 5 3 2021
medline: 18 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Nivolumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting the programmed death-1 receptor that improves survival in a subset of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). In contrast to other tumor types that respond to immunotherapy, factors such as programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) status and tumor mutational burden show limited predictive utility in ccRCC. To address this gap, we report here the first molecular characterization of nivolumab response using paired index lesions, before and during treatment of metastatic ccRCC. We analyzed gene expression and T-cell receptor (TCR) clonality using lesion-paired biopsies provided in the CheckMate 009 trial and integrated the results with their PD-L1/CD4/CD8 status, genomic mutation status and serum cytokine assays. Statistical tests included linear mixed models, logistic regression models, Fisher's exact test, and Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test. We identified transcripts related to response, both at baseline and on therapy, including several that are amenable to peripheral bioassays or to therapeutic intervention. At both timepoints, response was positively associated with T-cell infiltration but not associated with TCR clonality, and some non-Responders were highly infiltrated. Lower baseline T-cell infiltration correlated with elevated transcription of Wnt/β-catenin signaling components and hypoxia-regulated genes, including the Treg chemoattractant CCL28. On treatment, analysis of the non-responding patients whose tumors were highly T-cell infiltrated suggests association of the RIG-I-MDA5 pathway in their nivolumab resistance. We also analyzed our data using previous transcriptional classifications of ccRCC and found they concordantly identified a molecular subtype that has enhanced nivolumab response but is sunitinib-resistant. Our study describes molecular characteristics of response and resistance to nivolumab in patients with metastatic ccRCC, potentially impacting patient selection and first-line treatment decisions. NCT01358721.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Nivolumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting the programmed death-1 receptor that improves survival in a subset of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). In contrast to other tumor types that respond to immunotherapy, factors such as programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) status and tumor mutational burden show limited predictive utility in ccRCC. To address this gap, we report here the first molecular characterization of nivolumab response using paired index lesions, before and during treatment of metastatic ccRCC.
METHODS
We analyzed gene expression and T-cell receptor (TCR) clonality using lesion-paired biopsies provided in the CheckMate 009 trial and integrated the results with their PD-L1/CD4/CD8 status, genomic mutation status and serum cytokine assays. Statistical tests included linear mixed models, logistic regression models, Fisher's exact test, and Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test.
RESULTS
We identified transcripts related to response, both at baseline and on therapy, including several that are amenable to peripheral bioassays or to therapeutic intervention. At both timepoints, response was positively associated with T-cell infiltration but not associated with TCR clonality, and some non-Responders were highly infiltrated. Lower baseline T-cell infiltration correlated with elevated transcription of Wnt/β-catenin signaling components and hypoxia-regulated genes, including the Treg chemoattractant CCL28. On treatment, analysis of the non-responding patients whose tumors were highly T-cell infiltrated suggests association of the RIG-I-MDA5 pathway in their nivolumab resistance. We also analyzed our data using previous transcriptional classifications of ccRCC and found they concordantly identified a molecular subtype that has enhanced nivolumab response but is sunitinib-resistant.
CONCLUSION
Our study describes molecular characteristics of response and resistance to nivolumab in patients with metastatic ccRCC, potentially impacting patient selection and first-line treatment decisions.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT01358721.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33658305
pii: jitc-2020-001506
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001506
pmc: PMC7931766
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

B7-H1 Antigen 0
Biomarkers, Tumor 0
CD274 protein, human 0
CD4 Antigens 0
CD8 Antigens 0
Cytokines 0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors 0
PDCD1 protein, human 0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor 0
Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell 0
Nivolumab 31YO63LBSN

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01358721']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase I Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: PR-M, SDC, SP-C, PMS, RA, AMW, and MW-R were employees of Bristol Myers Squibb at the time of their contribution. TKC has served as a consultant/advisor for Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Eisai, Roche, and Prometheus Labs, Inc, and has received institutional research funding from Pfizer, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Exelixis, Roche, AstraZeneca, Peloton, and Tracon. MS has served as a consultant/advisor for Genentech-Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Pfizer, Novartis, Kyowa-Kirin, Amgen, Merus, Seattle Genetics, Immune Design, Prometheus, Anaeropharma, Astellas-Agensys, Immunova, Nektar, Neostem, Pierre-Fabre, Eli Lilly, Symphogen, Lion Biotechnologies, Amphivena, and Adaptive Biotechnologies.

Références

Clin Cancer Res. 1997 Jul;3(7):1077-86
pubmed: 9815786
BMC Immunol. 2015 Sep 03;16:53
pubmed: 26335138
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;3(7):913-920
pubmed: 27787547
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2019 Jun;38(1-2):65-77
pubmed: 31076951
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Apr 20;43(7):e47
pubmed: 25605792
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;(1):CD001425
pubmed: 15674877
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):909-918
pubmed: 32472114
Front Immunol. 2013 Dec 12;4:450
pubmed: 24376448
J Exp Med. 1996 Sep 1;184(3):1101-9
pubmed: 9064327
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Oct;17(5):e981-e994
pubmed: 31229459
J Biol Chem. 2006 Jun 2;281(22):15215-26
pubmed: 16565084
Science. 2018 Feb 16;359(6377):801-806
pubmed: 29301960
J Clin Invest. 2017 Aug 1;127(8):2930-2940
pubmed: 28650338
Br J Cancer. 2021 Jan;124(1):237-246
pubmed: 33024271
Cancer Immunol Res. 2013 Jul;1(1):32-42
pubmed: 24777248
Sci Immunol. 2019 Sep 13;4(39):
pubmed: 31519811
Nat Commun. 2018 Aug 29;9(1):3503
pubmed: 30158554
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;22(22):5461-5471
pubmed: 27169994
Int Immunopharmacol. 2017 Oct;51:165-170
pubmed: 28843907
Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 Nov;70:127-137
pubmed: 30173085
Nature. 2011 Jul 13;475(7355):226-30
pubmed: 21753853
Cancer Immunol Res. 2019 Feb;7(2):257-268
pubmed: 30659054
Cancer Discov. 2019 Apr;9(4):510-525
pubmed: 30622105
Cell Syst. 2015 Dec 23;1(6):417-425
pubmed: 26771021
Front Microbiol. 2018 Jul 19;9:1621
pubmed: 30072977
Cell Stem Cell. 2013 Sep 5;13(3):300-13
pubmed: 23871604
Science. 2018 Oct 12;362(6411):
pubmed: 30309915
Immunity. 2018 Apr 17;48(4):812-830.e14
pubmed: 29628290
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15545-50
pubmed: 16199517
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Mar 15;21(6):1329-39
pubmed: 25583177
Nature. 2013 Jul 4;499(7456):43-9
pubmed: 23792563
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 6;7(1):2887
pubmed: 28588275
Cell Res. 2019 Oct;29(10):846-861
pubmed: 31481761
Trends Cell Biol. 2019 Jan;29(1):44-65
pubmed: 30220580
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012 Jul;61(7):1019-31
pubmed: 22146893
Urol Oncol. 2016 Apr;34(4):168.e1-9
pubmed: 26670202
Nat Med. 2018 Jun;24(6):749-757
pubmed: 29867230
Genes Immun. 2005 Jun;6(4):319-31
pubmed: 15789058
Cancer Immunol Res. 2016 Sep 2;4(9):726-33
pubmed: 27491898
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar 10;34(8):833-42
pubmed: 26755520
Immunol Rev. 2018 Jan;281(1):99-114
pubmed: 29247998

Auteurs

Petra Ross-Macdonald (P)

Translational Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

Alice M Walsh (AM)

Translational Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

Scott D Chasalow (SD)

Translational Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

Ron Ammar (R)

Translational Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

Simon Papillon-Cavanagh (S)

Translational Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

Peter M Szabo (PM)

Translational Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

Toni K Choueiri (TK)

Department of Genitourinary Oncology, The Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Mario Sznol (M)

Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Megan Wind-Rotolo (M)

Translational Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA megan.windrotolo@bms.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH