Psychometric properties of the embodiment scale for the rubber hand illusion and its relation with individual differences.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 03 2021
Historique:
received: 08 10 2020
accepted: 08 02 2021
entrez: 4 3 2021
pubmed: 5 3 2021
medline: 5 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI) opened the investigation of the sense of body ownership in healthy people. By putting in slight contrast vision touch and proprioception, healthy people embody a fake hand in one's body representation. The easiness of the procedure, typically measured with a set of questions that capture the subjective experience, favoured its blooming. However, validation studies of embodiment questionnaires are lacking, and the individual differences that contribute to the embodiment received little attention. In our study, 298 participants underwent an RHI procedure following both synchronous and asynchronous (control) visuo-tactile stimulations. The study had multiple aims: (a) to explore the psychometric structure of a 27-items questionnaire largely used in the literature; (b) to build a psychometrically efficient scale to measure embodiment-related phenomena; (c) to explore whether and how individual differences (empathy, self-esteem and mindfulness) are associated with the experience of illusion. We found a relatively simple structure consisting of three components: embodiment of the rubber hand, disembodiment of the biological hand, physical sensations experienced during the procedure. The scales designed were psychometrically reliable and theoretically meaningful, encompassing 18 of the original items. Finally, by adopting a network analysis approach, we found that the embodiment is directly related to empathy and self-esteem, while disembodiment and physical sensation are unrelated to individual personality traits. The study provides substantial evidence to use the embodiment scale as a standard questionnaire for future RHI studies. Additionally, the correlations with personality traits suggest that the embodiment induced by the RHI deeply integrates with the complexity of the individuals and their differences.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33658576
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84595-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-84595-x
pmc: PMC7930179
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5029

Références

Cognition. 2008 Jun;107(3):978-98
pubmed: 18262508
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 25;11(1):4853
pubmed: 32978377
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 6;11(10):e0163921
pubmed: 27711234
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Oct;141(2):169-77
pubmed: 22964058
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Feb;48(3):703-12
pubmed: 19819247
Neurol Clin Pract. 2014 Jun;4(3):216-225
pubmed: 29473554
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 2;105(35):13169-73
pubmed: 18725630
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):195-212
pubmed: 28342071
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(1):143-60
pubmed: 17707508
Schizophr Bull. 2020 Feb 26;46(2):294-302
pubmed: 31150551
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1744-50
pubmed: 21371911
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(5):471-84
pubmed: 26610247
Conscious Cogn. 2007 Jun;16(2):229-40
pubmed: 17317221
Eur Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;30(7):868-73
pubmed: 26443055
Perception. 2010;39(9):1296-8
pubmed: 21125957
Biometrika. 2012 Sep;99(3):717-731
pubmed: 25294946
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Jun;21(2):799-812
pubmed: 22424939
Elife. 2016 Oct 20;5:
pubmed: 27760692
Curr Biol. 2011 Dec 6;21(23):R945-6
pubmed: 22153159
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21659
pubmed: 21738756
Brain Cogn. 2007 Jun;64(1):104-9
pubmed: 17118503
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015 May;23(3):450-7
pubmed: 25051556
Assessment. 2006 Mar;13(1):27-45
pubmed: 16443717
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Mar;20(1):82-93
pubmed: 20943417
Behav Brain Res. 2008 Aug 5;191(1):1-10
pubmed: 18423906
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Sep;132:107119
pubmed: 31194981
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Jul;204(3):343-52
pubmed: 19820918
Curr Biol. 2011 Oct 11;21(19):R804-5
pubmed: 21996499
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 15;11(12):e0168489
pubmed: 27977783
Perception. 2015;44(6):709-23
pubmed: 26489211
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Nov 30;245:473-481
pubmed: 27639162
Nature. 1998 Feb 19;391(6669):756
pubmed: 9486643

Auteurs

Daniele Romano (D)

Psychology Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milan, Italy. daniele.romano@unimib.it.
Mind and Behavior Technological Center (MIBTEC), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy. daniele.romano@unimib.it.
Department of History, Society and Human Studies, University of Salento, Milan, Italy. daniele.romano@unimib.it.

Angelo Maravita (A)

Psychology Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milan, Italy.

Marco Perugini (M)

Psychology Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milan, Italy.
Mind and Behavior Technological Center (MIBTEC), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH