Current Situation and Key Parameters for Improving Wheat Quality in China.

correlation cultivar location quality traits variation wheat year

Journal

Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 07 12 2020
accepted: 06 01 2021
entrez: 4 3 2021
pubmed: 5 3 2021
medline: 5 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Processing quality of winter-wheat is affected by genotype, environmental conditions, and crop husbandry practices. In the present study, a data set of 17 quality-related traits for 211 main winter-wheat varieties in China during 2006 to 2018 was extracted from China Wheat Quality Report. Analysis was carried out to evaluate the quality status and variations, to reveal correlation between quality-related traits, as well as to identify key influencing factors. Results indicated that the quality indicators of medium-gluten or medium-strong-gluten wheat varieties were acceptable, whereas those of weak- and strong-gluten wheat varieties were far below national standard, especially hardness index (HI), crude protein content (CPC), wet gluten content (WG), and water absorption for weak-gluten wheat and sedimentation value (SV), stability time (ST), and stretch area (SA) for strong-gluten wheat, respectively. Correlation analysis showed that WA, WG, development time, HI, CPC, falling number, ST, and tractility directly affected the overall quality of winter-wheat. CPC, SV, and WG in medium-gluten wheat had no significant correlation with the processing quality of noodles score, whereas gluten index significantly correlated with noodle score (

Identifiants

pubmed: 33659019
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.638525
pmc: PMC7917211
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

638525

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Ma, Li, Xue, Xiong, Peng, Han, Ju and He.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Front Plant Sci. 2019 May 15;10:642
pubmed: 31156690
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Jan;130(1):223-245
pubmed: 27796431
Plant Cell Environ. 2012 Oct;35(10):1799-823
pubmed: 22860982
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Feb 28;357(1418):133-42
pubmed: 11911770
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Mar 21;66(11):2491-2509
pubmed: 29488761
Trends Plant Sci. 2018 Nov;23(11):1029-1037
pubmed: 30249481
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jun 01;7:738
pubmed: 27313585
Food Chem. 2020 May 15;312:126074
pubmed: 31896453
Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2012;3:469-92
pubmed: 22224557

Auteurs

Mingming Ma (M)

Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

Yingchun Li (Y)

Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

Cheng Xue (C)

College of Resources and Environmental Science, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding, China.

Wei Xiong (W)

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.

Zhengping Peng (Z)

College of Resources and Environmental Science, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding, China.

Xue Han (X)

Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

Hui Ju (H)

Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

Yong He (Y)

Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

Classifications MeSH