Visual outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction and implantable collamer lens V4c for moderate myopia: 1-year results.
Implantable collamer lens V4c
Moderate myopia
Small incision lenticule extraction
Visual quality
Journal
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
ISSN: 1435-702X
Titre abrégé: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8205248
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
15
07
2020
accepted:
12
10
2020
revised:
28
09
2020
pubmed:
5
3
2021
medline:
19
8
2021
entrez:
4
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare 1-year visual outcomes after implantable collamer lens V4c (EVO-ICL) implantation and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate myopia. In this retrospective study, 67 eyes of 39 patients with a preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent between - 3.00 and - 6.00 diopters (D) were selected from a database of SMILE and ICL implantation procedures performed from April 2018 to December 2018. Thirty-two eyes of 20 patients underwent EVO-ICL implantation, and 35 eyes of 19 patients underwent SMILE. At the routine 1-year follow-up appointment, all selected patients were examined for higher-order ocular aberrations, retinal image quality, and a quality of vision (QoV) questionnaire. This data was then analyzed. No complications were observed. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuities at 1 year after surgery were - 0.13 ± 0.07 and - 0.15 ± 0.06 logMAR in the SMILE group, and - 0.10 ± 0.07 and - 0.16 ± 0.05 logMAR in the ICL group. Twenty-nine eyes (90.6%) which underwent ICL implantation and 34 eyes (97.1%) which underwent SMILE were within ± 0.5 D of the attempted spherical equivalent (P = 0.49). Changes in coma after ICL were significantly less than after SMILE (P = 0.002). The leading complaints after ICL and SMILE were halos (84.4%) and blurred vision (65.7%), respectively. Both SMILE and ICL implantation provided good safety, efficacy, and predictability in correcting moderate myopia. The subjective visual complaints consisted mainly of halos after ICL and starbursts and blurred vision after SMILE.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33661364
doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04982-4
pii: 10.1007/s00417-020-04982-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2431-2440Subventions
Organisme : Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN)
ID : 81770955
Organisme : Centre International de Recherche aux Frontières de la Chimie (FR)
ID : SHDC12018103
Organisme : the Project of Shanghai Science and Technology
ID : 17411950200
Informations de copyright
© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S (2011) Results of small incision lenticule extraction: all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(1):127–137
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.033
Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M (2011) Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Brit J Ophthalmol 95(3):335–339
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.174284
Moshirfar M, McCaughey MV, Reinstein DZ, Shah R, Santiago-Caban L, Fenzl CR (2015) Small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 41(3):652–665
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.02.006
Torky MA, Alzafiri YA (2017) Visual and refractive outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction in mild, moderate, and high myopia: six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg 43(4):459–465
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.01.015
Blum M, Lauer AS, Kunert KS, Sekundo W (2019) 10-year results of small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg 35(10):618–623
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190826-02
Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Shiratani T (2012) Intraindividual comparison of visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole implantation for moderate to high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 154(3):486–494
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.04.001
Huseynova T, Ozaki S, Ishizuka T, Mita M, Tomita M (2014) Comparative study of 2 types of implantable collamer lenses, 1 with and 1 without a central artificial hole. Am J Ophthalmol 157(6):1136–1143
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.01.032
Chen Y, Wang X, Zhou CD, Wu Q (2017) Evaluation of visual quality of spherical and aspherical intraocular lenses by optical quality analysis system. Int J Ophthalmol 10(6):914–918
pubmed: 28730082
pmcid: 5515137
Yan Z, Miao H, Zhao F, Wang X, Chen X, Li M, Zhou X (2018) Two-year outcomes of visian implantable collamer lens with a central hole for correcting high myopia. J Ophthalmol 2018:8678352
pubmed: 30057804
pmcid: 6051026
Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Kitazawa Y, Kojima T, Nakamura T, Oka Y, Matsumoto R (2018) Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation: comparative, multicentre study in 351 eyes with low-to-moderate or high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 102(2):177–181
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310164
Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Shimizu K, Matsumura K, Komatsu M (2012) Visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 153(6):1178–1186 e1
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.12.005
Miao H, He L, Shen Y, Li M, Yu Y, Zhou X (2014) Optical quality and intraocular scattering after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg 30(5):296–302
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140415-02
Li M, Li M, Chen Y, Miao H, Yang D, Ni K, Zhou X (2019) Five-year results of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK (FS-LASIK) for myopia. Acta Ophthalmol 97(3):e373–e380
doi: 10.1111/aos.14017
Niu L, Miao H, Tian M, Fu D, Wang X, Zhou X (2020) One-year visual outcomes and optical quality of femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction and visian implantable collamer lens (ICL V4c) implantation for high myopia. Acta Ophthalmol 98(6):e662–e667
doi: 10.1111/aos.14344
Vilaseca M, Peris E, Pujol J, Borras R, Arjona M (2010) Intra- and intersession repeatability of a double-pass instrument. Optom Vis Sci 87(9):675–681
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ea1ad3
Miao H, Chen X, Tian M, Chen Y, Wang X, Zhou X (2018) Refractive outcomes and optical quality after implantation of posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lens with a central hole (ICL V4c). BMC Ophthalmol 18(1):141
doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0805-3
Li M, Zhao J, Miao H, Shen Y, Sun L, Tian M, Wadium E, Zhou X (2014) Mild decentration measured by a Scheimpflug camera and its impact on visual quality following SMILE in the early learning curve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55(6):3886–3892
doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13714
McAlinden C, Pesudovs K, Moore JE (2010) The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(11):5537–5545
doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5341
Igarashi A, Shimizu K, Kamiya K (2014) Eight-year follow-up of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation for moderate to high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 157(3):532–539 e1
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.11.006
Tsiklis NS, Kymionis GD, Karp CL, Naoumidi T, Pallikaris AI (2007) Nine-year follow-up of a posterior chamber phakic IOL in one eye and LASIK in the fellow eye of the same patient. J Refract Surg 23(9):935–937
doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20071101-12
Ganesh S, Brar S, Pawar A (2017) Matched population comparison of visual outcomes and patient satisfaction between 3 modalities for the correction of low to moderate myopic astigmatism. Clin Ophthalmol 11:1253–1263
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S127101
Miao H, Tian M, Xu Y, Chen Y, Zhou X (2015) Visual outcomes and optical quality after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction: an 18-month prospective study. J Refract Surg 31(11):726–731
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20151021-01
Igarashi A, Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Komatsu M (2009) Visual performance after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 148(1):164–170 e1
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.02.001
Qin Q, Bao L, Yang L, He Z, Huang Z (2019) Comparison of visual quality after EVO-ICL implantation and SMILE to select the appropriate surgical method for high myopia. BMC Ophthalmol 19(1):21
doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1029-x
Siedlecki J, Schmelter V, Mayer WJ, Schworm B, Priglinger SG, Dirisamer M, Luft N (2020) SMILE versus implantable collamer lens implantation for high myopia: a matched comparative study. J Refract Surg 36(3):150–159
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20200210-02
Lim DH, Lyu IJ, Choi SH, Chung ES, Chung TY (2014) Risk factors associated with night vision disturbances after phakic intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol 157(1):135–141 e1
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.09.004
Eppig T, Spira C, Tsintarakis T, El-Husseiny M, Cayless A, Muller M, Seitz B, Langenbucher A (2015) Ghost-image analysis in phakic intraocular lenses with central hole as a potential cause of dysphotopsia. J Cataract Refract Surg 41(11):2552–2559
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.034
Wei R, Li M, Zhang H, Aruma A, Miao H, Wang X, Zhou J, Zhou X (2020) Comparison of objective and subjective visual quality early after implantable collamer lens V4c (ICL V4c) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia correction. Acta Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14459
Li M, Zhao J, Shen Y, Li T, He L, Xu H, Yu Y, Zhou X (2013) Comparison of dry eye and corneal sensitivity between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond LASIK for myopia. PLoS One 8(10):e77797
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077797