Healthy herds in the phytoplankton: the benefit of selective parasitism.
Journal
The ISME journal
ISSN: 1751-7370
Titre abrégé: ISME J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101301086
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
received:
27
10
2020
accepted:
10
02
2021
revised:
08
02
2021
pubmed:
6
3
2021
medline:
6
8
2021
entrez:
5
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The impact of selective predation of weaker individuals on the general health of prey populations is well-established in animal ecology. Analogous processes have not been considered at microbial scales despite the ubiquity of microbe-microbe interactions, such as parasitism. Here we present insights into the biotic interactions between a widespread marine thraustochytrid and a diatom from the ecologically important genus Chaetoceros. Physiological experiments show the thraustochytrid targets senescent diatom cells in a similar way to selective animal predation on weaker prey individuals. This physiology-selective targeting of 'unhealthy' cells appears to improve the overall health (i.e., increased photosynthetic quantum yield) of the diatom population without impacting density, providing support for 'healthy herd' dynamics in a protist-protist interaction, a phenomenon typically associated with animal predators and their prey. Thus, our study suggests caution against the assumption that protist-protist parasitism is always detrimental to the host population and highlights the complexity of microbial interactions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33664434
doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00936-8
pii: 10.1038/s41396-021-00936-8
pmc: PMC8245403
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2163-2166Références
Slobodkin LB. Prudent predation does not require group selection. Am Nat. 1974;108:665–78.
doi: 10.1086/282942
Williams PD. Unhealthy herds: some epidemiological consequences of host heterogeneity in predator-host-parasite systems. J Theor Biol. 2008;253:500–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.03.022
Packer C, Holt RD, Hudson PJ, Lafferty KD, Dobson AP. Keeping the herds healthy and alert: Implications of predator control for infectious disease. Ecol Lett. 2003;6:797–802.
doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00500.x
Lima-Mendez G, Faust K, Henry N, Decelle J, Colin S, Carcillo F, et al. Determinants of community structure in the global plankton interactome. Science 2015;348:1262073.
doi: 10.1126/science.1262073
Skovgaard A. Dirty tricks in the plankton: Diversity and role of marine parasitic protists. Acta Protozool. 2014;53:51–62.
Jephcott TG, Sime-Ngando T, Gleason FH, Macarthur DJ. Host-parasite interactions in food webs: Diversity, stability, and coevolution. Food Webs. 2016;6:1–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.fooweb.2015.12.001
Nelson DM, Tréguer P, Brzezinski MA, Leynaert A, Quéguiner B. Production and dissolution of biogenic silica in the ocean: Revised global estimates, comparison with regional data and relationship to biogenic sedimentation. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 1995;9:359–72.
doi: 10.1029/95GB01070
Timmermans KR, Veldhuis MJ, Brussaard CP. Cell death in three marine diatom species in response to different irradiance levels, silicate, or iron concentrations. Aquat Micro Ecol. 2007;46:253–61.
doi: 10.3354/ame046253
Pinto E, Van Nieuwerburgh L, De Barros MP, Pedersén M, Colepicolo P, Snoeijs P. Density-dependent patterns of thiamine and pigment production in the diatom Nitzschia microcephala. Phytochemistry. 2003;63:155–63.
doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(03)00048-7
Manoylov KM. Intra- and interspecific competition for nutrients and light in diatom cultures. J Freshw Ecol. 2009;24:145–57.
doi: 10.1080/02705060.2009.9664275
Houston DC, Cooper JE. The digestive tract of the whiteback griffon vulture and its role in disease transmission among wild ungulates. J Wildl Dis. 1975;11:306–13.
doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-11.3.306
Schaller G. The Serengeti lion: a study of predator-prey relations. London: University of Chicago Press; 1972.
Krumm CE, Conner MM, Hobbs NT, Hunter DO, Miller MW. Mountain lions prey selectively on prion-infected mule deer. Biol Lett. 2010;6:209–11.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0742
Pole A, Gordon IJ, Gorman ML, MacAskill M. Prey selection by African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) in southern Zimbabwe. J Zool. 2004;262:207–15.
doi: 10.1017/S0952836903004576
Husseman JS, Murray DL, Power G, Mack C, Wenger CR, Quigley H. Assessing differential prey selection patterns between two sympatric large carnivores. Oikos. 2003;101:591–601.
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12230.x
Lafferty KD. Fishing for lobsters indirectly increases epidemics in sea urchins. Ecol Appl. 2004;14:1566–73.
doi: 10.1890/03-5088
Duffy MA, Hall SR, Tessier AJ, Huebner M. Selective predators and their parasitized prey: Are epidemics in zooplankton under top-down control? Limnol Oceanogr. 2005;50:412–20.
doi: 10.4319/lo.2005.50.2.0412
Hudson PJ, Dobson AP, Newborn D. Do parasites make prey vulnerable to predation? Red grouse and parasites. J Anim Ecol. 1992;61:681.
doi: 10.2307/5623