General principles of image optimization in EUS.
B-mode
EUS
doppler
guideline
image quality
Journal
Endoscopic ultrasound
ISSN: 2303-9027
Titre abrégé: Endosc Ultrasound
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101622292
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
6
3
2021
medline:
6
3
2021
entrez:
5
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
With the development of modern EUS, multiple imaging functions, transducer settings, and examination modes have become available for clinical settings. While the major determinants of the ultrasound beam are still comprised of the signal wavelength, its frequency range, and its amplitude, other modifications and calculations have gained more interest for advanced users, such as tissue harmonic imaging (THI), spatial and frequency compounding, certain versions of speckle reduction, and various Doppler/duplex settings. The goal of such techniques is a better, perhaps more realistic image, with reduced artifacts (such as speckle), better image contrast, and an improved signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, "add-ons" such as THI, which is based on the phenomenon of nonlinear distortion of acoustic signals as they travel through tissues, provide greater contrast and an enhanced spatial resolution than conventional EUS. Finally, optimization of spectral and color Doppler imaging in EUS requires experience and knowledge about the basic principles of Doppler/duplex phenomena. For these purposes, factors such as adjustment of Doppler controls, Doppler angle, color gain, spectral wall filters, and others require special attention during EUS examinations. Incorporating these advanced techniques in EUS examinations may be time-consuming and cumbersome. Hence, practical guidelines enabling endosonographers to steer safely through the large quantity of technological properties and settings (knobology) are appreciated. This review provides an overview of the role of important imaging features to be adjusted before, during, and after EUS procedures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33666178
pii: 310486
doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_80_20
pmc: PMC8248305
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
168-184Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
Radiographics. 2015 Nov-Dec;35(7):1955-64
pubmed: 26562232
Int J Shoulder Surg. 2010 Jul;4(3):55-62
pubmed: 21472065
Pancreas. 2007 Oct;35(3):286-8
pubmed: 17895854
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Jul;66(1):131-43
pubmed: 17591487
Endosc Ultrasound. 2016 Nov-Dec;5(6):349-350
pubmed: 27824026
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Aug;37(4):77-99
pubmed: 26632995
Endosc Int Open. 2016 Jan;4(1):E42-50
pubmed: 26793784
Dig Endosc. 2015 Apr;27 Suppl 1:68-73
pubmed: 25630752
Ultraschall Med. 2001 Dec;22(6):247-57
pubmed: 11740692
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Apr;37(2):157-69
pubmed: 27058434
Dig Endosc. 2013 Sep;25(5):554-5
pubmed: 23889517
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Aug;37(4):412-20
pubmed: 27490463
Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Nov-Dec;8(6):360-369
pubmed: 31571619
Ultrasound Int Open. 2017 Sep;3(4):E137-E149
pubmed: 29226273
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Apr;37(2):E33-76
pubmed: 26515966
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):645-55
pubmed: 21679945
Endosc Ultrasound. 2018 Jan-Feb;7(1):20-28
pubmed: 29451165
Ultrasonography. 2020 Apr;39(2):105-113
pubmed: 31962384
Ultrasound Int Open. 2018 Jan;4(1):E2-E15
pubmed: 29423461
Z Gastroenterol. 2002 Jan;40(1):21-32
pubmed: 11803497
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug;82(2):189-202
pubmed: 26077457
Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jun;57(7):931-6
pubmed: 12776049
Endosc Ultrasound. 2020 Nov-Dec;9(6):361-368
pubmed: 32675463
Korean J Intern Med. 2018 Jan;33(1):36-63
pubmed: 29161800
Clin Endosc. 2019 Nov;52(6):533-540
pubmed: 31311914
Endosc Ultrasound. 2020 Sep-Oct;9(5):284-290
pubmed: 32675464
Ultraschall Med. 2019 Aug;40(4):425-453
pubmed: 31238377
Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Jan-Feb;8(1):3-16
pubmed: 30777940
Ultrasound Int Open. 2020 Jun;6(1):E14-E24
pubmed: 32885137