Dynamic Time-Warping Correction for Shifts in Ultrahigh Resolving Power Ion Mobility Spectrometry and Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations.
data alignment
dynamic time warping
ion mobility spectrometry (IMS)
mass spectrometry
single value alignment
structures for lossless ion manipulations (SLIM)
time series analysis
ultrahigh resolution
Journal
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
ISSN: 1879-1123
Titre abrégé: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010412
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Apr 2021
07 Apr 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
6
3
2021
medline:
6
3
2021
entrez:
5
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Detection of arrival time shifts between ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) separations can limit achievable resolving power (Rp), particularly when multiple separations are summed or averaged, as commonly practiced in IMS. Such variations can be apparent in higher Rp measurements and are particularly evident in long path length traveling wave structures for lossless ion manipulations (SLIM) IMS due to their typically much longer separation times. Here, we explore data processing approaches employing single value alignment (SVA) and nonlinear dynamic time warping (DTW) to correct for variations between IMS separations, such as due to pressure fluctuations, to enable more effective spectrum summation for improving Rp and detection of low-intensity species. For multipass SLIM IMS separations, where narrow mobility range measurements have arrival times that can extend to several seconds, the SVA approach effectively corrected for such variations and significantly improved Rp for summed separations. However, SVA was much less effective for broad mobility range separations, such as obtained with multilevel SLIM IMS. Changes in ions' arrival times were observed to be correlated with small pressure changes, with approximately 0.6% relative arrival time shifts being common, sufficient to result in a loss of Rp for summed separations. Comparison of the approaches showed that DTW alignment performed similarly to SVA when used over a narrow mobility range but was significantly better (providing narrower peaks and higher signal intensities) for wide mobility range data. We found that the DTW approach increased Rp by as much as 115% for measurements in which 50 IMS separations over 2 s were summed. We conclude that DTW is superior to SVA for ultra-high-resolution broad mobility range SLIM IMS separations and leads to a large improvement in effective Rp, correcting for ion arrival time shifts regardless of the cause, as well as improving the detectability of low-abundance species. Our tool is publicly available for use with universal ion mobility format (.UIMF) and text (.txt) files.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33666432
doi: 10.1021/jasms.1c00005
pmc: PMC8216491
mid: NIHMS1709296
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
996-1007Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P41 GM103493
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM130709
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R33 CA217699
Pays : United States
Références
J Proteomics. 2014 Jul 31;107:71-82
pubmed: 24686089
Int J Mass Spectrom. 2007 Feb 1;260(2-3):212-221
pubmed: 17541451
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2002;:564-75
pubmed: 11928508
J Chromatogr A. 2007 Jul 13;1156(1-2):14-24
pubmed: 17118375
Anal Chem. 2017 Nov 21;89(22):12176-12184
pubmed: 29039942
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 19;12(1):1185
pubmed: 33608539
Analyst. 2015 Oct 21;140(20):6853-61
pubmed: 26148962
KDD. 2012 Aug;2012:262-270
pubmed: 31660254
Anal Chem. 2020 Jun 2;92(11):7972-7979
pubmed: 32383592
Anal Chem. 2008 Dec 15;80(24):9689-99
pubmed: 18986171
Anal Chem. 2019 Apr 2;91(7):4374-4380
pubmed: 30816701
Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester). 2009;15(2):113-30
pubmed: 19423898
Anal Chem. 2006 Dec 15;78(24):8207-17
pubmed: 17165809
Anal Chem. 2006 Nov 15;78(22):7796-801
pubmed: 17105173
Anal Chem. 2016 Sep 20;88(18):8957-64
pubmed: 27531027
Analyst. 2019 Dec 16;145(1):240-248
pubmed: 31746829
Analyst. 2015 Mar 7;140(5):1391-410
pubmed: 25465248
Anal Chem. 2019 Sep 17;91(18):11952-11962
pubmed: 31450886
Anal Chem. 2016 Jul 19;88(14):7329-36
pubmed: 27321977
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2013 Oct;11(5):1350011
pubmed: 24131055
Anal Chem. 2009 Feb 1;81(3):1000-7
pubmed: 19138127
Bioinformatics. 2004 Nov 22;20(17):3034-44
pubmed: 15226172
Anal Chem. 2017 Sep 5;89(17):9048-9055
pubmed: 28763190
Sensors (Basel). 2020 May 09;20(9):
pubmed: 32397421
Anal Chem. 2011 Jan 1;83(1):23-9
pubmed: 21117630
Anal Chem. 2017 Jun 20;89(12):6432-6439
pubmed: 28497957
Analyst. 2017 Mar 27;142(7):1010-1021
pubmed: 28262893
Anal Chem. 2017 Apr 18;89(8):4628-4634
pubmed: 28332832
Chem Commun (Camb). 2018 Oct 25;54(83):11701-11704
pubmed: 30264832
Nat Methods. 2008 Nov;5(11):959-64
pubmed: 18931669
Anal Chem. 2020 Nov 17;92(22):14976-14982
pubmed: 33136380