Acute Inflammatory, Cortisol, and Soreness Responses to Supramaximal Accentuated Eccentric Loading.
Journal
Journal of strength and conditioning research
ISSN: 1533-4287
Titre abrégé: J Strength Cond Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9415084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Feb 2021
01 Feb 2021
Historique:
entrez:
5
3
2021
pubmed:
6
3
2021
medline:
15
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Merrigan, JJ and Jones, MT. Acute inflammatory, cortisol, and soreness responses to supramaximal accentuated eccentric loading. J Strength Cond Res 35(2S): S107-S113, 2021-The purpose was to determine differences in time under tension, cortisol, inflammation, and perceived soreness between accentuated eccentric (AEL) and traditional loading (TRA) resistance exercise protocols. Resistance-trained men (n = 21) completed the AEL and TRA protocols in a random order, separated by 48 hours (sets × reps at eccentric/concentric) as follows: AEL65, 3 × 5 at 120/65% 1 repetition maximum (RM); AEL80, 3 × 3 at 120/80% 1RM; TRA65, 3 × 5 at 65/65% 1RM; and TRA80, 3 × 3 at 80/80% 1RM. Four linear position transducers measured eccentric time under tension (ETUT) and total time under tension (TTUT). Ultrasonography measured vastus lateralis muscle thickness and echo intensity at baseline and immediately post-exercise. Salivary cortisol was assessed at baseline, 0-, 15-, 30-, and 60-minute post-exercise. Perceived soreness was assessed at baseline, 24-, and 48-hours post-exercise. During rep 1, AEL65 and AEL80 had longer ETUT and TTUT than TRA65 (p ≤ 0.002) and TRA80 (p ≤ 0.008), respectively. However, AEL65 had shorter ETUT (reps 3-5) and TTUT (reps 3-5) than TRA65 (p ≤ 0.043). Similarly, ETUT (reps 2-3) and TTUT (rep 3) was shorter in AEL80 than TRA80 (p ≤ 0.045). However, there was no protocol effect for ETUT and TTUT (p > 0.05). Muscle thickness changes were trivial after each protocol (AEL80, d = 0.19; TRA80, d = 0.15; AEL65, d = 0.24; TRA65, d = 0.23), but changes in echo intensity were moderate (AEL80, d = 0.61; TRA80, d = 0.61; AEL65, d = 0.61; TRA65, d = 0.76). Salivary cortisol decreased below baseline at 30- and 60-minute post-exercise (p ≤ 0.006). Perceived soreness elevated from baseline to 24 hours for AEL80 (p = 0.006). The inflammatory, cortisol, and soreness responses after AEL were either low or similar to TRA, indicating similar recovery patterns between protocols.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33666595
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003764
pii: 00124278-202102001-00017
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hydrocortisone
WI4X0X7BPJ
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S107-S113Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
Références
Alemany JA, Delgado-Díaz DC, Mathews H, Davis JM, Kostek MC. Comparison of acute responses to isotonic or isokinetic eccentric muscle action: Differential outcomes in skeletal muscle damage and implications for rehabilitation. Int J Sports Med 35: 1–7, 2014.
Boone JB Jr, Lambert CP, Flynn MG, et al. Resistance exercise effects on plasma cortisol, testosterone and creatine kinase activity in anabolic-androgenic steroid users. Int J Sports Med 11: 293–297, 1990.
Bridgeman LA, Gill ND, Dulson DK, McGuigan MR. The effect of exercise-induced muscle damage after a bout of accentuated eccentric load drop jumps and the repeated bout effect. J Strength Cond Res 31: 386–394, 2017.
Caresio C, Molinari F, Emanuel G, Minetto MA. Muscle echo intensity: Reliability and conditioning factors. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 35: 393–403, 2015.
Chapman D, Newton M, Sacco P, Nosaka K. Greater muscle damage induced by fast versus slow velocity eccentric exercise. Int J Sports Med 27: 591–598, 2006.
Chapman DW, Newton M, McGuigan M, Nosaka K. Effect of lengthening contraction velocity on muscle damage of the elbow flexors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40: 926–933, 2008.
Chen TC, Lin K-Y, Chen H-L, Lin M-J, Nosaka K. Comparison in eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage among four limb muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol 111: 211–223, 2011.
Chen TC, Yang T-J, Huang M-J, et al. Damage and the repeated bout effect of arm, leg, and trunk muscles induced by eccentric resistance exercises. Scand J Med Sci Sports 29: 725–735, 2019.
Cormie P, McBride JM, McCaulley GO. Validation of power measurement techniques in dynamic lower body resistance exercises. J Appl Biomech 23: 103–118, 2007.
Cormie P, McGuigan M, Newton RU. Changes in the eccentric phase contribute to improved stretch-shorten cycle performance after training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42: 1731–1744, 2010.
Crewther B, Cronin J, Keogh J, Cook C. The salivary testosterone and cortisol response to three loading schemes. J Strength Cond Res 22: 250–255, 2008.
Douglas J, Pearson S, Ross A, McGuigan M. Effects of accentuated eccentric loading on muscle properties, strength, power, and speed in resistance-trained rugby players. J Strength Cond Res 32: 2750–2761, 2018.
Friedmann B, Kinscherf R, Vorwald S, et al. Muscular adaptations to computer-guided strength training with eccentric overload. Acta Physiol Scand 182: 77–88, 2004.
Girden ER. ANOVA: Repeated Measures: SAGE, 1992.
Hill EE, Zack E, Battaglini C, et al. Exercise and circulating cortisol levels: The intensity threshold effect. J Endocrinol Invest 31: 587–591, 2008.
Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41: 3–13, 2009.
Hyldahl RD, Hubal MJ. Lengthening our perspective: Morphological, cellular, and molecular responses to eccentric exercise. Muscle Nerve 49: 155–170, 2014.
Ikegawa S, Funato K, Tsunoda N, et al. Muscle force per cross-sectional area is inversely related with pennation angle in strength trained athletes. J Strength Cond Res 22: 128–131, 2008.
Lin MJ, Chen TCC, Chen HL, Wu BH, Nosaka K. Low-intensity eccentric contractions of the knee extensors and flexors protect against muscle damage. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 40: 1004–1011, 2015.
MacIntyre DL, Mair J. Markers of inflammation and myofibrillar proteins following eccentric exercise in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 40: 1004–1011, 2001.
Mattacola CG, Perrin DH, Gansneder BM, Allen JD, Mickey CA. A comparison of visual analog and graphic rating scales for assessing pain following delayed onset muscle soreness. J Sport Rehabil 6: 38–46, 1997.
McGuigan MR, Egan AD, Foster C. Salivary cortisol responses and perceived exertion during high intensity and low intensity bouts of resistance exercise. J Sports Sci Med 3: 8–15, 2004.
Merrigan JJ, Jones MT, Malecek J, et al. Comparison of traditional and rest-redistribution sets on indirect markers of muscle damage following eccentric exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2020.
Merrigan JJ, Tufano JJ, Falzone MP, Jones MT. Effectiveness of accentuated eccentric loading: Contingent on concentric load. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 1: 1–23, 2020.
Middleton P, Montero C. Eccentric muscular work: Interests in the therapeutic management of the athlete. Ann de Réadaptation de Médecine Physique 47: 282–289, 2004.
Muddle TWD, Magrini MA, Colquhoun RJ, et al. Impact of fatiguing, submaximal high- vs. low-torque isometric exercise on acute muscle swelling, and echo intensity in resistance-trained men. J Strength Cond Res 33: 1007, 2019.
Munger CN, Archer DC, Leyva WD, et al. Acute effects of eccentric overload on concentric front squat performance. J Strength Cond Res 31: 1192–1197, 2017.
Newton MJ, Morgan GT, Sacco P, Chapman DW, Nosaka K. Comparison of responses to strenuous eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors between resistance-trained and untrained men. J Strength Cond Res 22: 597–607, 2008.
Nosaka K, Clarkson PM. Changes in indicators of inflammation after eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28: 953, 1996.
Nosaka K, Newton M, Sacco P. Delayed-onset muscle soreness does not reflect the magnitude of eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage. Scand J Med Sci Sports 12: 337–346, 2002.
Rack PMH, Westbury DR. The short range stiffness of active mammalian muscle and its effect on mechanical properties. J Physiol 240: 331–350, 1974.
Radaelli R, Bottaro M, Wilhelm EN, Wagner DR, Pinto RS. Time course of strength and echo intensity recovery after resistance exercise in women. J Strength Cond Res 26: 2577–2584, 2012.
Ryschon TW, Fowler MD, Wysong RE, Anthony A-R, Balaban RS. Efficiency of human skeletal muscle in vivo: Comparison of isometric, concentric, and eccentric muscle action. J Appl Physiol 83: 867–874, 1997.
Sarvazyan A, Tatarinov A, Sarvazyan N. Ultrasonic assessment of tissue hydration status. Ultrasonics 43: 661–671, 2005.
Suchomel TJ, Wagle JP, Douglas J, et al. Implementing eccentric resistance training—Part 1: A brief review of existing methods. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 4: 38, 2019.
Taniguchi M, Yamada Y, Ichihashi N. Acute effect of multiple sets of fatiguing resistance exercise on muscle thickness, echo intensity and extracellular-to-intracellular water ratio. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 45: 213–219, 2020.
Wagle J, Taber C, Carroll K, et al. Repetition-to-repetition differences using cluster and accentuated eccentric loading in the back squat. Sports 6: 59, 2018.
Wagle JP, Taber CB, Cunanan AJ, et al. Accentuated eccentric loading for training and performance: A review. Sports Med 47: 2473–2495, 2017.
Willoughby DS, Taylor M, Taylor L. Glucocorticoid receptor and ubiquitin expression after repeated eccentric exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35: 2023, 2003.
Yanagisawa O, Kudo H, Takahashi N, Yoshioka H. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of cooling on blood flow and oedema in skeletal muscles after exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 91: 737–740, 2004.
Yarrow JF, Borsa PA, Borst SE, et al. Early-phase neuroendocrine responses and strength adaptations following eccentric-enhanced resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 22: 1205–1214, 2008.