New Mechanistic Insights on Carbon Nanotubes' Nanotoxicity Using Isolated Submitochondrial Particles, Molecular Docking, and Nano-QSTR Approaches.
F0F1-ATPase
carbon nanotubes
computational nanotoxicology
mitochondria
Journal
Biology
ISSN: 2079-7737
Titre abrégé: Biology (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101587988
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Feb 2021
25 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
03
01
2021
revised:
17
02
2021
accepted:
19
02
2021
entrez:
6
3
2021
pubmed:
7
3
2021
medline:
7
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Single-walled carbon nanotubes can induce mitochondrial F0F1-ATPase nanotoxicity through inhibition. To completely characterize the mechanistic effect triggering the toxicity, we have developed a new approach based on the combination of experimental and computational study, since the use of only one or few techniques may not fully describe the phenomena. To this end, the in vitro inhibition responses in submitochondrial particles (SMP) was combined with docking, elastic network models, fractal surface analysis, and Nano-QSTR models. In vitro studies suggest that inhibition responses in SMP of F0F1-ATPase enzyme were strongly dependent on the concentration assay (from 3 to 5 µg/mL) for both pristine and COOH single-walled carbon nanotubes types (SWCNT). Besides, both SWCNTs show an interaction inhibition pattern mimicking the oligomycin A (the specific mitochondria F0F1-ATPase inhibitor blocking the c-ring F0 subunit). Performed docking studies denote the best crystallography binding pose obtained for the docking complexes based on the free energy of binding (FEB) fit well with the in vitro evidence from the thermodynamics point of view, following an affinity order such as: FEB (oligomycin A/F0-ATPase complex) = -9.8 kcal/mol > FEB (SWCNT-COOH/F0-ATPase complex) = -6.8 kcal/mol ~ FEB (SWCNT-pristine complex) = -5.9 kcal/mol, with predominance of van der Waals hydrophobic nano-interactions with key F0-ATPase binding site residues (Phe 55 and Phe 64). Elastic network models and fractal surface analysis were performed to study conformational perturbations induced by SWCNT. Our results suggest that interaction may be triggering abnormal allosteric responses and signals propagation in the inter-residue network, which could affect the substrate recognition ligand geometrical specificity of the F0F1-ATPase enzyme in order (SWCNT-pristine > SWCNT-COOH). In addition, Nano-QSTR models have been developed to predict toxicity induced by both SWCNTs, using results of in vitro and docking studies. Results show that this method may be used for the fast prediction of the nanotoxicity induced by SWCNT, avoiding time- and money-consuming techniques. Overall, the obtained results may open new avenues toward to the better understanding and prediction of new nanotoxicity mechanisms, rational drug design-based nanotechnology, and potential biomedical application in precision nanomedicine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33668702
pii: biology10030171
doi: 10.3390/biology10030171
pmc: PMC7996163
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
ID : UID/QUI/50006/2020
Organisme : Xunta de Galicia
ID : ED41E2018/08
Références
Int J Biol Macromol. 1990 Dec;12(6):374-8
pubmed: 2088495
ACS Nano. 2010 Oct 26;4(10):5703-12
pubmed: 20857979
Nature. 1961 Jul 8;191:144-8
pubmed: 13771349
Methods Mol Biol. 2010;648:245-55
pubmed: 20700717
Oncogene. 2002 Nov 21;21(53):8149-57
pubmed: 12444550
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2010 Jan 27;7:7
pubmed: 20181022
J Cheminform. 2015 May 15;7:18
pubmed: 26082804
Nanotoxicology. 2017 Apr;11(3):339-350
pubmed: 28277981
Cell Death Dis. 2018 Feb 28;9(3):329
pubmed: 29491386
J Exp Biol. 2000 Jan;203(Pt 1):9-17
pubmed: 10600668
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jun 15;31(12):i151-60
pubmed: 26072477
Chemosphere. 1999 Apr;38(10):2281-92
pubmed: 10101866
Int J Biol Macromol. 2020 Nov 15;163:730-744
pubmed: 32653381
Nanomedicine. 2010 Jun;6(3):427-41
pubmed: 20056170
Rev Neurol. 2005 Jan 16-31;40(2):81-5
pubmed: 15712160
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973 Dec 31;301(3):249-77
pubmed: 4273937
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Oct 13;19(10):
pubmed: 30322149
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016 Feb;124:32-36
pubmed: 26452192
Biochem J. 1977 Nov 15;168(2):299-303
pubmed: 202265
J Med Chem. 2006 May 4;49(9):2713-24
pubmed: 16640331
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 22;111(29):10580-5
pubmed: 24979777
J Chem Inf Model. 2019 Jan 28;59(1):86-97
pubmed: 30408958
Drug Discov Today. 2015 Mar;20(3):318-31
pubmed: 25448759
Small. 2013 May 27;9(9-10):1842-52
pubmed: 23423856
Chemosphere. 2020 Mar;242:125192
pubmed: 31677509
Nanotoxicology. 2015;9(5):636-42
pubmed: 25211549
Front Oncol. 2014 Aug 25;4:234
pubmed: 25202683
Nanotoxicology. 2016 Nov;10(9):1207-14
pubmed: 27309010
Biophys J. 2009 Jan;96(2):464-75
pubmed: 19167297
Molecules. 2019 Dec 11;24(24):
pubmed: 31835808
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 16;7(1):13271
pubmed: 29038520
Science. 1999 Apr 2;284(5411):92-6
pubmed: 10102825
J Med Chem. 2004 Feb 26;47(5):1081-4
pubmed: 14971888
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):235-42
pubmed: 10592235
Biochem J. 1980 Jun 15;188(3):945-8
pubmed: 6258563
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Jan;22(1):745-57
pubmed: 25223357
Nat Protoc. 2016 May;11(5):905-19
pubmed: 27077332
J Comput Chem. 2010 Jan 30;31(2):455-61
pubmed: 19499576
J Biol Chem. 2004 Aug 20;279(34):35616-21
pubmed: 15199054
Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2004 Feb 23;14(4):1027-30
pubmed: 15013016
Methods Cell Biol. 1978;20:411-81
pubmed: 151184
Mini Rev Med Chem. 2015;15(8):608-21
pubmed: 25694078
Nanotoxicology. 2017 Sep;11(7):891-906
pubmed: 28937298
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2011 May-Jun;3(3):298-306
pubmed: 21384562
Chemosphere. 2015 Nov;139:18-22
pubmed: 26026259
Front Physiol. 2020 Apr 09;11:258
pubmed: 32327997
PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Sep;3(9):1716-26
pubmed: 17892319