Inhibition of Potassium Channels Affects the Ability of Pig Spermatozoa to Elicit Capacitation and Trigger the Acrosome Exocytosis Induced by Progesterone.
Acrosome
/ drug effects
Animals
Calcium
/ metabolism
Cell Membrane
/ drug effects
Cell Survival
/ drug effects
Exocytosis
/ drug effects
Intracellular Space
/ metabolism
Male
Membrane Potential, Mitochondrial
/ drug effects
Paxillin
/ pharmacology
Potassium Channel Blockers
/ pharmacology
Potassium Channels
/ metabolism
Progesterone
/ pharmacology
Quinine
/ pharmacology
Sperm Capacitation
/ drug effects
Sperm Motility
/ drug effects
Swine
capacitation
paxilline
pigs
potassium channels
quinine
spermatozoa
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Feb 2021
17 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
14
07
2020
revised:
16
02
2021
accepted:
16
02
2021
entrez:
6
3
2021
pubmed:
7
3
2021
medline:
14
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
During capacitation, sperm undergo a myriad of changes, including remodeling of plasma membrane, modification of sperm motility and kinematic parameters, membrane hyperpolarization, increase in intracellular calcium levels, and tyrosine phosphorylation of certain sperm proteins. While potassium channels have been reported to be crucial for capacitation of mouse and human sperm, their role in pigs has not been investigated. With this purpose, sperm samples from 15 boars were incubated in capacitation medium for 300 min with quinine, a general blocker of potassium channels (including voltage-gated potassium channels, calcium-activated potassium channels, and tandem pore domain potassium channels), and paxilline (PAX), a specific inhibitor of calcium-activated potassium channels. In all samples, acrosome exocytosis was induced after 240 min of incubation with progesterone. Plasma membrane and acrosome integrity, membrane lipid disorder, intracellular calcium levels, mitochondrial membrane potential, and total and progressive sperm motility were evaluated after 0, 120, and 240 min of incubation, and after 5, 30, and 60 min of progesterone addition. Although blocking potassium channels with quinine and PAX prevented sperm to elicit in vitro capacitation by impairing motility and mitochondrial function, as well as reducing intracellular calcium levels, the extent of that inhibition was larger with quinine than with PAX. Therefore, while our data support that calcium-activated potassium channels are essential for sperm capacitation in pigs, they also suggest that other potassium channels, such as the voltage-gated, tandem pore domain, and mitochondrial ATP-regulated ones, are involved in that process. Thus, further research is needed to elucidate the specific functions of these channels and the mechanisms underlying its regulation during sperm capacitation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33671466
pii: ijms22041992
doi: 10.3390/ijms22041992
pmc: PMC7922121
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Paxillin
0
Potassium Channel Blockers
0
Potassium Channels
0
Progesterone
4G7DS2Q64Y
Quinine
A7V27PHC7A
Calcium
SY7Q814VUP
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
ID : RYC-2014-15581
Organisme : Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
ID : AGL2017-88329-R
Organisme : Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca
ID : 2017-SGR-1229
Organisme : Università degli Studi di Teramo
ID : 2018-CUN07-VET/10
Références
Physiol Rev. 1999 Apr;79(2):481-510
pubmed: 10221988
FEBS Lett. 2010 Mar 5;584(5):1041-6
pubmed: 20138882
Reproduction. 2001 Aug;122(2):327-36
pubmed: 11467984
Theriogenology. 2010 Apr 15;73(7):995-1000
pubmed: 20171719
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jan 20;106(3):667-8
pubmed: 19144927
J Biol Chem. 2012 Dec 28;287(53):44384-93
pubmed: 23095755
Mol Hum Reprod. 2001 Sep;7(9):819-28
pubmed: 11517288
J Membr Biol. 2004 May 15;199(2):63-72
pubmed: 15383917
Andrology. 2018 Sep;6(5):720-736
pubmed: 29858528
Cytometry A. 2008 Oct;73(10):926-30
pubmed: 18752282
Reprod Domest Anim. 2003 Apr;38(2):119-24
pubmed: 12654022
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015 Jul 3;462(3):257-62
pubmed: 25956060
Reprod Biol. 2017 Mar;17(1):69-78
pubmed: 28077244
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2020 Apr;63:154-161
pubmed: 32097833
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 May 04;21(9):
pubmed: 32375375
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 5;108(14):5879-84
pubmed: 21427226
J Androl. 1998 Sep-Oct;19(5):542-50
pubmed: 9796613
J Biol Chem. 1998 Feb 6;273(6):3509-16
pubmed: 9452476
Biol Reprod. 2004 Aug;71(2):540-7
pubmed: 15084484
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Feb 12;2020:8749083
pubmed: 32104196
Anim Reprod Sci. 2006 Jun;93(1-2):34-45
pubmed: 16139444
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2010 Oct;56(5):334-48
pubmed: 20849222
FEBS Lett. 1990 Jan 15;260(1):105-8
pubmed: 2404792
Cell Tissue Res. 2020 May;380(2):237-262
pubmed: 32140927
Cell Calcium. 2015 Jul;58(1):105-13
pubmed: 25465894
Anim Reprod Sci. 2009 Oct;115(1-4):124-36
pubmed: 19084358
Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2007 Jul;8(7):555-62
pubmed: 17659475
Reprod Domest Anim. 2011 Aug;46(4):664-73
pubmed: 21121968
Theriogenology. 2005 Jan 15;63(2):342-51
pubmed: 15626403
Mol Reprod Dev. 1993 Jun;35(2):197-208
pubmed: 8391278
Chem Rev. 2008 May;108(5):1744-73
pubmed: 18476673
J Biol Chem. 2014 Nov 14;289(46):32266-32275
pubmed: 25271166
Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2007;65:245-59
pubmed: 17644966
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010 Mar;298(3):C530-41
pubmed: 20053924
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 02;6:22569
pubmed: 26931070
Int J Androl. 2012 Apr;35(2):109-24
pubmed: 21950496
Nat Cell Biol. 2007 Mar;9(3):235-42
pubmed: 17330112
FEBS Lett. 1985 Jun 3;185(1):4-8
pubmed: 2581813
Elife. 2014 Mar 26;3:e01438
pubmed: 24670955
Neuropharmacology. 1996;35(7):963-8
pubmed: 8938726
J Anim Sci. 2006 Aug;84(8):2089-100
pubmed: 16864869
In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2016 Oct;52(9):953-960
pubmed: 27338736
Elife. 2013 Oct 08;2:e01009
pubmed: 24137539
Physiol Rev. 1998 Jan;78(1):247-306
pubmed: 9457175
Curr Top Dev Biol. 2013;102:385-421
pubmed: 23287041
Annu Rev Physiol. 1990;52:399-414
pubmed: 2184762
Reproduction. 2009 Sep;138(3):425-37
pubmed: 19542252
Asian J Androl. 2011 May;13(3):395-405
pubmed: 21540868
Annu Rev Physiol. 2012;74:453-75
pubmed: 22017176
Anim Reprod Sci. 2009 Dec;116(3-4):244-53
pubmed: 19261396
Acta Naturae. 2014 Oct;6(4):10-26
pubmed: 25558391
J Cell Sci. 2001 Oct;114(Pt 19):3543-55
pubmed: 11682613
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010 Jul 29;323(2):224-31
pubmed: 20219627
Biol Reprod. 2002 Jul;67(1):269-75
pubmed: 12080027
Pharmacol Rev. 1995 Sep;47(3):387-573
pubmed: 8539268
Reprod Domest Anim. 2002 Dec;37(6):379-80
pubmed: 12464079
Mol Reprod Dev. 1996 Nov;45(3):378-91
pubmed: 8916050
Physiol Rev. 2011 Oct;91(4):1305-55
pubmed: 22013213
Andrology. 2015 Jul;3(4):729-47
pubmed: 26097097
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Dec 15;20(24):
pubmed: 31847486
Hum Reprod Update. 2019 Nov 5;25(6):758-776
pubmed: 31665287
Hum Reprod. 2003 May;18(5):1029-36
pubmed: 12721181
Reproduction. 2015 Aug;150(2):R65-76
pubmed: 25964382