Influence of Light Spectra from LEDs and Scion × Rootstock Genotype Combinations on the Quality of Grafted Watermelon Seedlings.

Citrullus lanatus Cucurbita maxima × Cucurbita moschata genotypic dependency graft healing light-emitting diodes

Journal

Plants (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2223-7747
Titre abrégé: Plants (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101596181

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 11 12 2020
revised: 09 02 2021
accepted: 10 02 2021
entrez: 6 3 2021
pubmed: 7 3 2021
medline: 7 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Grafting is the main means of propagation for watermelon crops. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether light quality during graft healing variably affects different scion × rootstock genotype combinations. Two watermelon hybrid scions (Sunny Florida F1 and Celine F1) and two interspecific squash rootstocks (Radik and TZ-148) were used, and four scion × rootstock genotype combinations derived. After grafting, we tested seven light-emitting diodes (LEDs), which provided narrow-band red (R) and blue (B); R-B with 36% (36B), 24% (24B), and 12% (12B) blue; 12B with additional far-red (12B+FR); and white (W), in a healing chamber. In three genotype combinations, shoot length, leaf area, and shoot biomass were mainly enhanced under red-blue LEDs, while stem diameter was greater under R. In contrast, dry weight of roots, Dickson's quality index, and ratio of shoot dry weight/length were variably affected in each genotype combination. From the results, it is concluded that light treatments differentially affected each genotype combination, but some parameters involving biomass production show genotypic dependency.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33673386
pii: plants10020353
doi: 10.3390/plants10020353
pmc: PMC7918498
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : European Commission
ID : T1EDK-00960
Organisme : Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation
ID : T1EDK-00960

Références

Plant Physiol. 2003 Dec;133(4):1464-70
pubmed: 14645723
Photochem Photobiol. 2001 Feb;73(2):199-207
pubmed: 11272735
Plant Physiol. 2002 Jun;129(2):762-73
pubmed: 12068117
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2013 Jan;15(1):67-74
pubmed: 22686322
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013;64:403-27
pubmed: 23373700
J Exp Bot. 2010 Jun;61(11):3107-17
pubmed: 20504875
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010 Jun-Jul;1797(6-7):1313-26
pubmed: 20226756
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019 Jun;139:548-557
pubmed: 31029028
J Agric Food Chem. 2020 Aug 19;68(33):8757-8763
pubmed: 32806129
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Mar 10;7:250
pubmed: 27014285
J Exp Bot. 2017 Apr 1;68(9):2099-2110
pubmed: 28575474
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Feb 17;8:190
pubmed: 28261245

Auteurs

Filippos Bantis (F)

Department of Horticulture, Aristotle University, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.

Christodoulos Dangitsis (C)

Agris S.A., Kleidi, 59300 Imathia, Greece.

Athanasios Koukounaras (A)

Department of Horticulture, Aristotle University, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.

Classifications MeSH