Inhibition of Intercellular Cytosolic Traffic via Gap Junctions Reinforces Lomustine-Induced Toxicity in Glioblastoma Independent of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status.
gap junctions
glioblastoma
intercellular cytosolic traffic
lomustine
meclofenamate
Journal
Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8247
Titre abrégé: Pharmaceuticals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238453
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Feb 2021
27 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
18
02
2021
accepted:
24
02
2021
entrez:
6
3
2021
pubmed:
7
3
2021
medline:
7
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Glioblastoma is a malignant brain tumor and one of the most lethal cancers in human. Temozolomide constitutes the standard chemotherapeutic agent, but only shows limited efficacy in glioblastoma patients with unmethylated O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter status. Recently, it has been shown that glioblastoma cells communicate via particular ion-channels-so-called gap junctions. Interestingly, inhibition of these ion channels has been reported to render MGMT promoter-methylated glioblastoma cells more susceptible for a therapy with temozolomide. However, given the percentage of about 65% of glioblastoma patients with an unmethylated MGMT promoter methylation status, this treatment strategy is limited to only a minority of glioblastoma patients. In the present study we show that-in contrast to temozolomide-pharmacological inhibition of intercellular cytosolic traffic via gap junctions reinforces the antitumoral effects of chemotherapeutic agent lomustine, independent of MGMT promoter methylation status. In view of the growing interest of lomustine in glioblastoma first and second line therapy, these findings might provide a clinically-feasible way to profoundly augment chemotherapeutic effects for all glioblastoma patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33673490
pii: ph14030195
doi: 10.3390/ph14030195
pmc: PMC7997332
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Int J Cancer. 2020 Dec 15;147(12):3281-3291
pubmed: 32510582
Hum Mol Genet. 1999 Jul;8(7):1169-76
pubmed: 10369861
Nature. 2015 Dec 3;528(7580):93-8
pubmed: 26536111
PLoS Biol. 2018 Jul 3;16(7):e2005970
pubmed: 29969450
Exp Cell Res. 2016 Jun 10;344(2):153-66
pubmed: 27138904
Cancer Res. 1977 May;37(5):1450-4
pubmed: 851960
EMBO Mol Med. 2016 May 02;8(5):550-68
pubmed: 27138567
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:e329-e342
pubmed: 28989042
Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2012 Jan;5(1):102-14
pubmed: 22122467
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2013 Nov;32(11):1164-9
pubmed: 23584353
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jun 20;11(6):
pubmed: 31226836
J Neurosci. 1992 Nov;12(11):4565-74
pubmed: 1432110
J Mol Med (Berl). 2020 Apr;98(4):495-512
pubmed: 32219470
Oncogene. 2008 Sep 4;27(39):5169-81
pubmed: 18469856
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2016;14(7):759-71
pubmed: 27262601
Int J Cancer. 2021 Apr 1;148(7):1695-1707
pubmed: 33113214
Int J Cancer. 2016 Apr 1;138(7):1709-18
pubmed: 26519239
J Mol Diagn. 2007 Jul;9(3):368-81
pubmed: 17591937
Stem Cell Res. 2014 Jul;13(1):135-43
pubmed: 24879067
Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1990 Jan-Feb;11(1):1-15
pubmed: 2322633
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 16;377(20):1954-1963
pubmed: 29141164
Pharm Res. 2016 May;33(5):1289-303
pubmed: 26903051
Nat Rev Cancer. 2016 Dec;16(12):775-788
pubmed: 27782134
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(3):1458-61
pubmed: 17406435
Pharmacology. 1984;29(2):85-93
pubmed: 6433367
Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 1;76(1):139-49
pubmed: 26542214
Cancer Treat Rev. 2020 Jul;87:102029
pubmed: 32408220
Stem Cells Dev. 2013 Jul 1;22(13):1870-82
pubmed: 23428290
Nature. 2016 May 18;533(7604):493-498
pubmed: 27225120
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 May 1;24(9):2159-2170
pubmed: 29463553
Lancet. 2019 Feb 16;393(10172):678-688
pubmed: 30782343
Nat Rev Cancer. 2010 Jun;10(6):435-41
pubmed: 20495577
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;19(10):1316-1326
pubmed: 28419303