Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional postmortem ultrasound: feasibility in perinatal death investigation.
Autopsy
Foetus
Pathology
Perinatal
Postmortem
Three-dimensional ultrasound
Ultrasound
Journal
Pediatric radiology
ISSN: 1432-1998
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0365332
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
25
03
2020
accepted:
14
12
2020
revised:
29
08
2020
pubmed:
7
3
2021
medline:
16
10
2021
entrez:
6
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Three- and four-dimensional US techniques in antenatal screening are commonplace, but they are not routinely used for perinatal postmortem US. In this technical innovation, we performed both two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) postmortem US on 11 foetuses (mean gestation: 23 weeks; range: 15-32 weeks) to determine whether there was any benefit in 3-D over conventional 2-D methods. In one case of osteogenesis imperfecta, both 2-D and 3-D US images were non-diagnostic because of small foetal size. Of the remaining 10 foetuses, 7 were normal at imaging and autopsy, and 3 had abnormalities detected on both 2-D and 3-D US. There were no false-positive diagnoses by 2-D or 3-D US. Whilst 3-D postmortem US was a feasible technique, it did not provide additional information over 2-D US. Routine 3-D postmortem US cannot therefore be routinely recommended based on our findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33674890
doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04934-4
pii: 10.1007/s00247-020-04934-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1259-1266Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R002118/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research (GB)
ID : NIHR-CDF-2017-10-037
Organisme : Research Councils UK (GB)
ID : MR/R002118/1
Organisme : Medical Research Council (GB)
ID : MR/R002118/1
Références
Shelmerdine SC, Sebire NJ, Arthurs OJ (2019) Perinatal post mortem ultrasound (PMUS): a practical approach. Insights Imaging 10:35
doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0723-9
Shelmerdine S, Langan D, Sebire NJ, Arthurs O (2019) Diagnostic accuracy of perinatal post-mortem ultrasound (PMUS): a systematic review. BMJ Paediatr Open 3:e000566
doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000566
Prodhomme O, Baud C, Saguintaah M et al (2015) Comparison of postmortem ultrasound and X-ray with autopsy in fetal death: retrospective study of 169 cases. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 3:120–130
doi: 10.1016/j.jofri.2015.04.002
Votino C, Cos Sanchez T, Bessieres B et al (2018) Minimally invasive fetal autopsy using ultrasound: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 52:776–783
doi: 10.1002/uog.14642
Shelmerdine SC, Sebire NJ, Arthurs OJ (2019) Perinatal post-mortem ultrasound (PMUS): radiological–pathological correlation. Insights into imaging 10:81
doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0762-2
The Royal College of Pathologists (2017) Guidelines on autopsy practice: fetal autopsy (2nd trimester fetal loss and termination of pregnancy for congenital anomaly). Online document. https://www.rcpath.org/uploads/assets/b20ea503-7799-433c-99160653762f896c/Fetal-autopsy-2nd-trimester-fetal-loss-and-termination-of-pregnancy-for-congenital-anomaly.pdf . Accessed 1 Mar 2020
The Royal College of Pathologists (2017) Guidelines on autopsy practice: third trimester antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth. Online document. https://www.rcpath.org/uploads/assets/0e55a233-5fe6-4965-b85f4fa7c9971742/Guidelines-on-autopsy-practice-Third-trimester-antepartum-and-intrapartum-stillbirth.pdf . Accessed 1 Mar 2020
Hutchinson JC, Shelmerdine SC, Lewis C et al (2019) Minimally invasive perinatal and pediatric autopsy with laparoscopically assisted tissue sampling: feasibility and experience of the MinImAL procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 54:661–669
doi: 10.1002/uog.20211
Norman W, Jawad N, Jones R et al (2016) Perinatal and paediatric post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMR): sequences and technique. Br J Radiol 89:20151028
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20151028
Merz E, Welter C (2005) 2D and 3D ultrasound in the evaluation of normal and abnormal fetal anatomy in the second and third trimesters in a level III center. Ultraschall Med 26:9–16
doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813947
Xu HX, Zhang QP, Lu MD, Xiao XT (2002) Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional sonography in evaluating fetal malformations. J Clin Ultrasound 30:515–525
doi: 10.1002/jcu.10109
Li Y, Tao GW, Pan MZ, Shao GR (2018) Comparison of traditional 2D and 3D Omniview technique in detection of fetus corpus callosum. Med Ultrason 20:493–497
doi: 10.11152/mu-1555
Huang C, Zhao B, Lv S et al (2019) Smart-planes fetal heart (S-planes FH) software to quantitative [sic] evaluate the fetal great arteries. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1651279
Karmegaraj B, Kumar S, Srimurugan B et al (2020) 3D/4D spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) fetal echocardiography provides incremental benefit in predicting the postnatal surgical approach in double outlet right ventricle. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.21988