Static magnetic stimulation in the central nervous system: a systematic review.

Brain stimulation Central nervous system Magnetic field Neurophysiology Systematic review

Journal

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology
ISSN: 1590-3478
Titre abrégé: Neurol Sci
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 100959175

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2021
Historique:
received: 01 04 2020
accepted: 26 02 2021
pubmed: 7 3 2021
medline: 15 5 2021
entrez: 6 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To systematically review the literature on the use of the transcranial static magnetic stimulation (tSMS) technique in humans and animals, its effects on different areas of the central nervous system (CNS), its influence on neural excitability and on the subject's behavior, and its biological effects and future possibilities. All static magnetic field applications that can be considered to have a physiologically similar effect have been reviewed. We searched studies using key terms in NCBI PubMed, Scopus, PEDro, SciELO, Cochrane, and links to publications (inception to September 2019). Three reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the studies using the recommendations described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, PRISMA guidelines. We analyzed 27 studies. The reviewed literature suggests that the use of these magnetic fields has an inhibitory effect on different areas of the CNS, such as motor, somatosensory, and visual cortex, cerebellum, and spinal cord. Regarding subject's behavior, the different effects of tSMS appear to be transient and dependent on the stimulated area, such as loss of visual discrimination or improvement of somatosensory perception. In addition, the technique has some therapeutic utility, specifically in pathologies with cortical hyperexcitability. These results suggest that tSMS may be a promising tool to modulate cerebral excitability in a safe and non-invasive way. Further investigations could give a better explanation of its precise mechanisms of action and applications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33675004
doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05156-8
pii: 10.1007/s10072-021-05156-8
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1733-1749

Références

Zhu H, Lu Z, Jin Y, Duan X, Teng J, Duan D (2015) Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson motor function: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Acta Neuropsychiatr 27(02):82–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2014.43
doi: 10.1017/neu.2014.43 pubmed: 25592544
Huang Y-Z, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC (2005) Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 45(2):201–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033 pubmed: 15664172
Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM et al (2008) Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul 1(3):206–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004 pubmed: 20633386
Oliviero A, Mordillo-Mateos L, Arias P, Panyavin I, Foffani G (2011) & Aguilar, Juan. Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol 589(20):4949–4958. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2011.211953
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.211953 pubmed: 21807616 pmcid: 3224885
Pascual-Leone A, Freitas C, Oberman L et al (2011) Characterizing brain cortical plasticity and network dynamics across the age-span in health and disease with TMS-EEG and TMS-fMRI. Brain Topogr 24(3-4):302–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-011-0196-8
doi: 10.1007/s10548-011-0196-8 pubmed: 21842407 pmcid: 3374641
Klomjai W, Katz R, Lackmy-Vallée A (2015) Basic principles of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS (rTMS). Ann Phys Rehabil Med 58(4):208–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2015.05.005
doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.05.005 pubmed: 26319963
Paulus W (2011) Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES - tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods. Neuropsychol Rehabil 21(5):602–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2011.557292
doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.557292 pubmed: 21819181
Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA (2011) Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist. 17(1):37–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858410386614
doi: 10.1177/1073858410386614 pubmed: 21343407
Sánchez-León CA, Sánchez-López Á, Ammann C, Cordones I, Carretero-Guillén A, Márquez-Ruiz J (2018) Exploring new transcranial electrical stimulation strategies to modulate brain function in animal models. Curr Opin Biomed Eng 8:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2018.09.001
doi: 10.1016/j.cobme.2018.09.001 pubmed: 30272042 pmcid: 6157267
Rosen AD (2003) Mechanism of action of moderate-intensity static magnetic fields on biological systems. Cell Biochem Biophys 39(2):163–174. https://doi.org/10.1385/CBB:39:2:163
doi: 10.1385/CBB:39:2:163 pubmed: 14515021
Silbert BI, Pevcic DD, Patterson HI, Windnagel KA, Thickbroom GW (2003) Inverse correlation between resting motor threshold and corticomotor excitability after static magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Brain Stimul 6(5):817–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2013.03.007
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.03.007
Nojima I, Koganemaru S, Fukuyama H, Mima T (2015) Static magnetic field can transiently alter the human intracortical inhibitory system. Clin Neurophysiol 126(12):2314–2319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.01.030
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.01.030 pubmed: 25792074
Nojima I, Koganemaru S, Mima T (2016) Combination of static magnetic fields and peripheral nerve stimulation can alter focal cortical excitability. Front Hum Neurosci 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00598
Dileone M, Carrasco-López MC, Segundo-Rodriguez JC, Mordillo-Mateos L, López-Ariztegui N, Alonso-Frech F et al (2017) Dopamine-dependent changes of cortical excitability induced by transcranial static magnetic field stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Sci Rep 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04254-y
Kufner M, Brückner S, Kammer T (2017) No modulatory effects by transcranial static magnetic field stimulation of human motor and somatosensory cortex. Brain Stimul 10(3):703–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.03.001
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.03.001 pubmed: 28302459
Dileone M, Mordillo-Mateos L, Oliviero A, Foffani G (2018) Long-lasting effects of transcranial static magnetic field stimulation on motor cortex excitability. Brain Stimul 11(4):676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2018.02.005
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.02.005 pubmed: 29500043
Kirimoto H, Tamaki H, Otsuru N, Yamashiro K, Onishi H, Nojima I, Oliviero A (2018) Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation over the primary motor cortex induces plastic changes in cortical nociceptive processing. Front Hum Neurosci 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00063
Nakagawa K, Sasaki A, Nakazawa K (2019) Accuracy in pinch force control can be altered by static magnetic field stimulation over the primary motor cortex. Neuromodulation (17). https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12912
Sheffield A, Ahn S, Alagapan S, Fröhlich F (2018) Modulating neural oscillations by transcranial static magnetic field stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a crossover, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot study. Eur J Neurosci 49(2):250–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14232
doi: 10.1111/ejn.14232 pubmed: 30380175 pmcid: 6347507
Nojima I, Watanabe T, Gyoda T, Sugata H, Ikeda T, Mima T (2019) Transcranial static magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex alters sequential implicit motor learning. Neurosci Lett 696(7):33–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.12.010
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.12.010 pubmed: 30552943
Davila-Pérez P, Pascual-Leone A, Cudeiro J (2019) Effects of transcranial static magnetic stimulation on motor cortex evaluated by different TMS waveforms and current directions. Neuroscience 413:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.05.065
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.05.065 pubmed: 31195056
Lacroix, A., Proulx-Bégin, L., Hamel, R., De Beaumont, L., Bernier, PM., & Lepage JF. Static magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex impairs online but not offline motor sequence learning. Sci Rep 2019, 9(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46379-2
Kirimoto H, Tamaki H, Matsumoto T, Sugawara K, Suzuki M, Oyama M, Onishi H (2014) Effect of transcranial static magnetic field stimulation over the sensorimotor cortex on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans. Brain Stimul 7(6):836–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.09.016
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.09.016 pubmed: 25444588
Kirimoto H, Asao A, Tamaki H, Onishi H (2016) Non-invasive modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials by the application of static magnetic fields over the primary and supplementary motor cortices. Sci Rep 6(1):4–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34509
doi: 10.1038/srep34509
Carrasco-López C, Soto-León V, Céspedes V, Profice P, Strange BA, Foffani G, Oliviero A (2017) Static magnetic field stimulation over parietal cortex enhances somatosensory detection in humans. J Neurosci 37(14):3840–3847. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2123-16.2017
doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.2123-16.2017 pubmed: 28280254 pmcid: 6596712
Gonzalez-Rosa JJ, Soto-Leon V, Real P, Carrasco-Lopez C, Foffani G, Strange BA, Oliviero A (2015) Static magnetic field stimulation over the visual cortex increases alpha oscillations and slows visual search in humans. J Neurosci 35(24):9182–9193. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4232-14.2015
doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.4232-14.2015 pubmed: 26085640 pmcid: 6605156
Rivadulla C, Aguilar J, Coletti M, Aguila J, Prieto S, Cudeiro J (2018) Static magnetic fields reduce epileptiform activity in anesthetized rat and monkey. Sci Rep 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33808-x
Aguila J, Cudeiro J, Rivadulla C (2016) Effects of static magnetic fields on the visual cortex: reversible visual deficits and reduction of neuronal activity. Cereb Cortex 26(2):628–638. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu228
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu228 pubmed: 25260705
Lozano-Soto E, Soto-León V, Sabbarese S et al (2017) Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) of the visual cortex decreases experimental photophobia. Cephalalgia 38(8):1493–1497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417736899
doi: 10.1177/0333102417736899 pubmed: 29020806
Nakagawa K, Nakazawa K (2018) Static magnetic field stimulation applied over the cervical spinal cord can decrease corticospinal excitability in finger muscle. Clin Neurophysiol Pract 3:49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2018.02.001
doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2018.02.001 pubmed: 30215008 pmcid: 6133779
Matsugi A (2017) Cerebellar transcranial static magnetic field stimulation transiently reduces cerebellar brain inhibition. Funct Neurol 32(2):77. https://doi.org/10.11138/fneur/2017.32.2.077
doi: 10.11138/fneur/2017.32.2.077 pubmed: 28676140 pmcid: 5507156
Purves D (2011) Neuroscience, 5th edn. Sunderland, Massachusetts U.S.A. Sinauer Associates Inc
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006 pubmed: 19621070 pmcid: 2707010
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264e9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535
Yamato TP, Maher C, Koes B, Moseley A (2017) The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials. J Clin Epidemiol 86:176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.002
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.002 pubmed: 28288916
Hooijmans, C. R., Rovers, M. M., de Vries, R. B., Leenaars, M., Ritskes-Hoitinga, M., & Langendam, M. W. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014, 14(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-43
Banerjee J, Sorrell ME, Celnik PA, Pelled G (2017) Immediate effects of repetitive magnetic stimulation on single cortical pyramidal neurons. PLoS One 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170528
Huerta PT, Volpe BT (2009) Transcranial magnetic stimulation, synaptic plasticity and network oscillations. J NeuroEng Rehabil 6:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-7
doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-7 pubmed: 19254380 pmcid: 2653496
Bikson M, Inoue M, Akiyama H et al (2004) Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro. J Physiol 557(Pt 1):175–190. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2003.055772
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.055772 pubmed: 14978199 pmcid: 1665051
Zaghi S, Acar M, Hultgren B, Boggio PS, Fregni F (2010) Noninvasive brain stimulation with low-intensity electrical currents: putative mechanisms of action for direct and alternating current stimulation. Neuroscientist. 16(3):285–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858409336227
doi: 10.1177/1073858409336227 pubmed: 20040569
Kim S, Chung Y-A, Lee C-U, Chae J-H, Juh R, Jeong J (2010) Target-specific rCBF changes induced by 0.3-T static magnetic field exposure on the brain. Brain Res 1317:211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.057
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.057 pubmed: 19879862
Oliviero A, Carrasco-López MC, Campolo M et al (2015) Safety study of transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) of the human cortex. Brain Stimul 8(3):481–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.12.002
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.12.002 pubmed: 25595064
Bertolino G, Dutra Souza HC, de Araujo JE (2013) Neuropathology and behavioral impairments in Wistar rats with a 6-OHDA lesion in the substantia nigra compacta and exposure to a static magnetic field. Electromagn Biol Med 32(4):527–535. https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2012.751394
doi: 10.3109/15368378.2012.751394 pubmed: 23631668
McLean MJ, Engström S, Holcomb RR, Sanchez D (2003) A static magnetic field modulates severity of audiogenic seizures and anticonvulsant effects of phenytoin in DBA/2 mice. Epilepsy Res 55(1-2):105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-1211(03)00109-8
doi: 10.1016/s0920-1211(03)00109-8 pubmed: 12948620
Giorgetto, C., Silva, E. C. M., Kitabatake, T. T., Bertolino, G., & de Araujo, J. E. Behavioural profile of Wistar rats with unilateral striatal lesion by quinolinic acid (animal model of Huntington disease) post-injection of apomorphine and exposure to static magnetic field. Exp Brain Res 2015, 233(5): 1455–1462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4219-7
Di Lazzaro V, Rothwell JC, Oliviero A et al (1999) Intracortical origin of the short latency facilitation produced by pairs of threshold magnetic stimuli applied to human motor cortex. Exp Brain Res 129:494–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050919
doi: 10.1007/s002210050919 pubmed: 10638423
Di Lazzaro V, Restuccia D, Oliviero A et al (1998) Magnetic transcranial stimulation at intensities below active motor threshold activates intracortical inhibitory circuits. Exp Brain Res 119:265–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050341
doi: 10.1007/s002210050341 pubmed: 9535577
Ugawa Y, Uesaka Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Kanazawa I (1995) Magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum in humans. Ann Neurol 37(6):703–713. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410370603
doi: 10.1002/ana.410370603 pubmed: 7778843
Rivadulla C, Foffani G, Oliviero A (2013) Magnetic field strength and reproducibility of neodymium magnets useful for transcranial static magnetic field stimulation of the human cortex. Neuromodulation 17(5):438–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12125
doi: 10.1111/ner.12125 pubmed: 24125470
Tharayil JJ, Goetz SM, Bernabei JM, Peterchev AV (2017) Field distribution of transcranial static magnetic stimulation in realistic human head model. Neuromodulation 21(4):340–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12699
doi: 10.1111/ner.12699 pubmed: 29024263 pmcid: 5893444
Nakano M, Yamada S, Udagawa R, Kato N (2004) Frequency dependent requirement for calcium store-operated mechanisms in induction of homosynaptic long-term depression at hippocampus CA1 synapses. Eur J Neurosci 19:2881–2887. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03390.x
doi: 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03390.x pubmed: 15147321
Pinto AD, Chen R (2001) Suppression of the motor cortex by magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum. Exp Brain Res 140(4):505–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210100862
doi: 10.1007/s002210100862 pubmed: 11685404
Daskalakis ZJ, Paradiso GO, Christensen BK, Fitzgerald PB, Gunraj C, Chen R (2004) Exploring the connectivity between the cerebellum and motor cortex in humans. J Physiol 557(2):689–700. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2003.059808
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.059808 pubmed: 15047772
Iwata N, Ugawa Y (2005) The effects of cerebellar stimulation on the motor cortical excitability in neurological disorders: a review. Cerebellum 4(4):218–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/14734220500277007
doi: 10.1080/14734220500277007 pubmed: 16321876
Ben Yakir-Blumkin M, Loboda Y, Schächter L, Finberg JPM (2014) Neuroprotective effect of weak static magnetic fields in primary neuronal cultures. Neuroscience 278:313–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.08.029
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.08.029 pubmed: 25171788
Abraham WC, Bear MF (1996) Metaplasticity: the plasticity of synaptic plasticity. Trends Neurosci 19(4):126–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(96)80018-X
doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(96)80018-X pubmed: 8658594
Isaacson JS, Scanziani M (2011) How inhibition shapes cortical activity. Neuron. 72(2):231–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.027
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.027 pubmed: 22017986 pmcid: 3236361
Chen SX, Kim AN, Peters AJ, Komiyama T (2015) Subtype-specific plasticity of inhibitory circuits in motor cortex during motor learning. Nat Neurosci 18(8):1109–1115. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4049
doi: 10.1038/nn.4049 pubmed: 26098758 pmcid: 4519436
Kuhn YA, Keller M, Ruffieux J, Taube W (2017) Intracortical inhibition within the primary motor cortex can be modulated by changing the focus of attention. J Vis Exp (127):55771. https://doi.org/10.3791/55771
Hummel FC, Steven B, Hoppe J et al (2009) Deficient intracortical inhibition (SICI) during movement preparation after chronic stroke. Neurology 72(20):1766–1772. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a609c5
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a609c5 pubmed: 19451532 pmcid: 2683737
Mall V, Berweck S, Fietzek UM et al (2004) Low level of intracortical inhibition in children shown by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropediatrics 35(2):120–125. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-815834
doi: 10.1055/s-2004-815834 pubmed: 15127311
Papegaaij S, Taube W, Baudry S, Otten E, Hortobágyi T (2014) Aging causes a reorganization of cortical and spinal control of posture. Front Aging Neurosci 6:28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00028
doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00028 pubmed: 24624082 pmcid: 3939445
Xue M, Atallah BV, Scanziani M (2014) Equalizing excitation-inhibition ratios across visual cortical neurons. Nature. 511(7511):596–600. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13321
doi: 10.1038/nature13321 pubmed: 25043046 pmcid: 4117808
Kolasinski J, Hinson EL, Divanbeighi Zand AP, Rizov A, Emir UE, Stagg CJ (2018) The dynamics of cortical GABA in human motor learning. J Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP276626
Floyer-Lea A, Wylezinska M, Kincses T, Matthews PM (2006) Rapid modulation of GABA concentration in human sensorimotor cortex during motor learning. J Neurophysiol 95(3):1639–1644. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00346.2005
doi: 10.1152/jn.00346.2005 pubmed: 16221751
Thut G (2006) Band electroencephalographic activity over occipital cortex indexes visuospatial attention bias and predicts visual target detection. J Neurosci 26(37):9494–9502. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0875-06.2006
doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.0875-06.2006 pubmed: 16971533 pmcid: 6674607
Donner TH, Kettermann A, Diesch E, Ostendorf F, Villringer A, Brandt SA (2002) Visual feature and conjunction searches of equal difficulty engage only partially overlapping frontoparietal networks. NeuroImage 15(1):16–25. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0951
doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0951 pubmed: 11771970
Min B-K, Herrmann CS (2007) Prestimulus EEG alpha activity reflects prestimulus top-down processing. Neurosci Lett 422(2):131–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2007.06.013
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.06.013 pubmed: 17611028
Kawasaki M, Kitajo K, Yamaguchi Y (2014) Fronto-parietal and fronto-temporal theta phase synchronization for visual and auditory-verbal working memory. Front Psychol 5:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00200
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00200
Scholz S, Schneider SL, Rose M (2017) Differential effects of ongoing EEG beta and theta power on memory formation. PLoS ONE 12(2):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171913
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171913
Khanna P, Carmena JM (2017) Beta band oscillations in motor cortex reflect neural population signals that delay movement onset. eLife 6. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24573
Hofman D, Schutter DJLG (2011) Asymmetrical frontal resting-state beta oscillations predict trait aggressive tendencies and behavioral inhibition. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 7(7):850–857. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr060
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr060 pubmed: 22016441 pmcid: 3475360
Ferrara JM, Adam OR, Ondo WG (2010) Levodopa-induced dyskinesias in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. Arch Neurol 67(1):114–115. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2009.291
doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.291 pubmed: 20065139
Wang X, Mao Z, Yu X (2020) The role of noninvasive brain stimulation for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci 2020(41):1063–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04245-4
doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04245-4
Alomar AS, Saeedi JR (2020) Different modalities of invasive neurostimulation for epilepsy. Neurol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04614-z
Wang Z, Chen J, Lin Z et al (2020) Transcranial direct current stimulation improves the swallowing function in patients with cricopharyngeal muscle dysfunction following a brainstem stroke. Neurol Sci 41:569–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04120-x
doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-04120-x pubmed: 31713753
Trebossen V, Bouaziz N, Benadhira R, Januel D (2017) Transcranial direct current stimulation for patients with benign essential blepharospasm: a case report. Neurol Sci 38(1):201–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2703-x
doi: 10.1007/s10072-016-2703-x pubmed: 27672032

Auteurs

Nuria Viudes-Sarrion (N)

Área de Fisioterapia. Departamento de Patología y Cirugía, Universidad Miguel Hernández, 03550, San Juan de Alicante, Spain.
Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante (CSIC-Universidad Miguel Hernández), San Juan de Alicante, Spain.

Enrique Velasco (E)

Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante (CSIC-Universidad Miguel Hernández), San Juan de Alicante, Spain.

Miguel Delicado-Miralles (M)

Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante (CSIC-Universidad Miguel Hernández), San Juan de Alicante, Spain.

Carmen Lillo-Navarro (C)

Área de Fisioterapia. Departamento de Patología y Cirugía, Universidad Miguel Hernández, 03550, San Juan de Alicante, Spain. mclillo@umh.es.
Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante (CSIC-Universidad Miguel Hernández), San Juan de Alicante, Spain. mclillo@umh.es.
CEIT Fisioterapia. UMH, San Juan de Alicante, Spain. mclillo@umh.es.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH