Context matters when implementing patient centred rehabilitation models for persons with cognitive impairment: a case study.
Aged
Cognitive dysfunction
Delivery of health care
Focus groups
Health personnel
Rehabilitation centers
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Mar 2021
06 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
01
10
2020
accepted:
23
02
2021
entrez:
7
3
2021
pubmed:
8
3
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is a growing number of older adults with cognitive impairment (CI) that require inpatient rehabilitation, and as such patient centred rehabilitation models have been developed. However, implementing evidence-based models without attending to the fit of the model to the new context could lead to an unsuccessful outcome. Researchers collaborated with administrators and staff in one rural site to adapt a patient centred rehabilitation model of care in the Canadian province of Ontario. This paper reports on the contextual factors that influenced the implementation of the model of care. The study takes a case study approach. One rural facility was purposefully selected for its interest in offering rehabilitation to persons with CI. Four focus group discussions were conducted to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions on the contextual factors that could affect the implementation of the rehabilitation model of care in the facility. Twenty-seven professionals with various backgrounds were purposively sampled using a maximum diversity sampling strategy. A hybrid inductive-deductive approach was used to analyze the data using the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) Framework. Across the domains of the CICI framework, three domains (political, epidemiological, and geographical) and seven corresponding sub-domains of the context were found to have a major influence on the implementation process. Key elements within the political domain included effective teamwork, facilitation, adequate resources, effective communication strategies, and a vision for change. Within the epidemiological domain, a key element was knowing how to tailor rehabilitation approaches for persons with CI. Infrastructure, an aspect of the geographical domain, focused on the facility's physical layout that required attention. The CICI framework was a useful guide to identify key factors within the context that existed and were required to fully support the implementation of the model of care in a new environment. The findings suggest that when implementing a new program of care, strong consideration should be paid to the political, epidemiological, and geographical domains of the context and how they interact and influence one another.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is a growing number of older adults with cognitive impairment (CI) that require inpatient rehabilitation, and as such patient centred rehabilitation models have been developed. However, implementing evidence-based models without attending to the fit of the model to the new context could lead to an unsuccessful outcome. Researchers collaborated with administrators and staff in one rural site to adapt a patient centred rehabilitation model of care in the Canadian province of Ontario. This paper reports on the contextual factors that influenced the implementation of the model of care.
METHODS
METHODS
The study takes a case study approach. One rural facility was purposefully selected for its interest in offering rehabilitation to persons with CI. Four focus group discussions were conducted to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions on the contextual factors that could affect the implementation of the rehabilitation model of care in the facility. Twenty-seven professionals with various backgrounds were purposively sampled using a maximum diversity sampling strategy. A hybrid inductive-deductive approach was used to analyze the data using the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) Framework.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Across the domains of the CICI framework, three domains (political, epidemiological, and geographical) and seven corresponding sub-domains of the context were found to have a major influence on the implementation process. Key elements within the political domain included effective teamwork, facilitation, adequate resources, effective communication strategies, and a vision for change. Within the epidemiological domain, a key element was knowing how to tailor rehabilitation approaches for persons with CI. Infrastructure, an aspect of the geographical domain, focused on the facility's physical layout that required attention.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The CICI framework was a useful guide to identify key factors within the context that existed and were required to fully support the implementation of the model of care in a new environment. The findings suggest that when implementing a new program of care, strong consideration should be paid to the political, epidemiological, and geographical domains of the context and how they interact and influence one another.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33676516
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06206-9
pii: 10.1186/s12913-021-06206-9
pmc: PMC7937255
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
204Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 410011045
Pays : Canada
Références
Age Ageing. 2019 Jul 1;48(4):498-505
pubmed: 30855656
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jul 23;:1-12
pubmed: 31335212
Gerontologist. 2020 Apr 2;60(3):503-512
pubmed: 30759218
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Feb;220(2):136-48.e1
pubmed: 25535170
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Jun;73(6):481-482
pubmed: 30787038
Orthop Nurs. 2020 May/Jun;39(3):165-168
pubmed: 32443089
Harm Reduct J. 2019 May 2;16(1):30
pubmed: 31046759
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Mar 1;17(3):200-5
pubmed: 26612482
Dementia (London). 2020 Nov 23;:1471301220969615
pubmed: 33222528
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Apr 20;17(1):91
pubmed: 28427333
Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(4):314-22
pubmed: 18210323
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009 Jul-Aug;49(1):e23-31
pubmed: 18842307
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2010 Nov;1(2):52-62
pubmed: 23569663
Qual Health Care. 1998 Sep;7(3):149-58
pubmed: 10185141
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011 Oct;12(8):556-564
pubmed: 21450227
Dementia (London). 2017 Nov;16(8):1020-1031
pubmed: 26843421
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
Dementia (London). 2017 May;16(4):413-423
pubmed: 26289963
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Jan;64(1):47-54
pubmed: 26782851
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e000840
pubmed: 30775011
BMC Geriatr. 2013 Dec 13;13:136
pubmed: 24330470
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 15;12(1):21
pubmed: 28202031
Healthc Q. 2006;10 Spec No:10-9, 4
pubmed: 17163111
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 21;7(12):e018226
pubmed: 29273658
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 17;19(1):709
pubmed: 31623609