Comparison of Combinatorial Signatures of Global Network Dynamics Generated by Two Classes of ODE Models.
37N25
Boolean network
Morse graph
combinatorial dynamics
regulatory network
switching system
Journal
SIAM journal on applied dynamical systems
ISSN: 1536-0040
Titre abrégé: SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101297692
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
entrez:
8
3
2021
pubmed:
1
1
2019
medline:
1
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Modeling the dynamics of biological networks introduces many challenges, among them the lack of first principle models, the size of the networks, and difficulties with parameterization. Discrete time Boolean networks and related continuous time switching systems provide a computationally accessible way to translate the structure of the network to predictions about the dynamics. Recent work has shown that the parameterized dynamics of switching systems can be captured by a combinatorial object, called a Dynamic Signatures Generated by Regulatory Networks (DSGRN) database, that consists of a parameter graph characterizing a finite parameter space decomposition, whose nodes are assigned a Morse graph that captures global dynamics for all corresponding parameters. We show that for a given network there is a way to associate the same type of object by considering a continuous time ODE system with a continuous right-hand side, which we call an L-system. The main goal of this paper is to compare the two DSGRN databases for the same network. Since the L-systems can be thought of as perturbations (not necessarily small) of the switching systems, our results address the correspondence between global parameterized dynamics of switching systems and their perturbations. We show that, at corresponding parameters, there is an order preserving map from the Morse graph of the switching system to that of the L-system that is surjective on the set of attractors and bijective on the set of fixed-point attractors. We provide important examples showing why this correspondence cannot be strengthened.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33679257
doi: 10.1137/18m1163610
pmc: PMC7932180
mid: NIHMS1579579
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
418-457Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P20 GM103474
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG040020
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM126555
Pays : United States
Références
Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Feb 09;12(3):220-6
pubmed: 22318235
Nat Rev Cancer. 2008 Sep;8(9):671-82
pubmed: 18650841
Bull Math Biol. 2015 Jun;77(6):953-83
pubmed: 25758753
Science. 2004 Aug 20;305(5687):1107; author reply 1107
pubmed: 15326338
Biosystems. 2016 Nov;149:70-112
pubmed: 27619217
Curr Top Dev Biol. 2011;94:129-69
pubmed: 21295686
Bull Math Biol. 1995 Mar;57(2):247-76
pubmed: 7703920
J Theor Biol. 1972 Feb;34(2):219-37
pubmed: 5015702
J Theor Biol. 2009 Sep 21;260(2):196-209
pubmed: 19524598
Chaos. 2013 Jun;23(2):025001
pubmed: 23822498
Bull Math Biol. 2004 Mar;66(2):301-40
pubmed: 14871568
SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst. 2018;17(2):1589-1616
pubmed: 31762711
Physica D. 2018 Mar 15;367:19-37
pubmed: 29867284
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Oct;9(10):770-80
pubmed: 18797474
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Jun;7(6):e1002085
pubmed: 21731481
BMC Genomics. 2006 May 05;7:108
pubmed: 16677373
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Jun 23;11(5):e1004338
pubmed: 26102287
J Theor Biol. 1973 Apr;39(1):103-29
pubmed: 4741704
SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst. 2016;15(4):2176-2212
pubmed: 30774565
Physica D. 2017 Jan 15;339:18-38
pubmed: 28392611
Biosystems. 2006 May;84(2):91-100
pubmed: 16434137
Bioinformatics. 2007 Sep 15;23(18):2415-22
pubmed: 17660209
Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 15;22(14):e124-31
pubmed: 16873462
Syst Biol (Stevenage). 2006 Jul;153(4):154-67
pubmed: 16986617
J Theor Biol. 1973 Dec;42(3):563-85
pubmed: 4588055
Cell. 2009 Aug 21;138(4):760-73
pubmed: 19703401
Bioinformatics. 2005 Jun;21 Suppl 1:i19-28
pubmed: 15961457