Decoding Spatial Versus Non-spatial Processing in Auditory Working Memory.
auditory
functional magnetic resonance imaging
location
multivoxel pattern analysis
pitch
searchlight analysis
working memory
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
04
12
2020
accepted:
19
01
2021
entrez:
8
3
2021
pubmed:
9
3
2021
medline:
9
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Research on visual working memory has shown that individual stimulus features are processed in both specialized sensory regions and higher cortical areas. Much less evidence exists for auditory working memory. Here, a main distinction has been proposed between the processing of spatial and non-spatial sound features. Our aim was to examine feature-specific activation patterns in auditory working memory. We collected fMRI data while 28 healthy adults performed an auditory delayed match-to-sample task. Stimuli were abstract sounds characterized by both spatial and non-spatial information, i.e., interaural time delay and central frequency, respectively. In separate recording blocks, subjects had to memorize either the spatial or non-spatial feature, which had to be compared with a probe sound presented after a short delay. We performed both univariate and multivariate comparisons between spatial and non-spatial task blocks. Processing of spatial sound features elicited a higher activity in a small cluster in the superior parietal lobe than did sound pattern processing, whereas there was no significant activation difference for the opposite contrast. The multivariate analysis was applied using a whole-brain searchlight approach to identify feature-selective processing. The task-relevant auditory feature could be decoded from multiple brain regions including the auditory cortex, posterior temporal cortex, middle occipital gyrus, and extended parietal and frontal regions. In summary, the lack of large univariate activation differences between spatial and non-spatial processing could be attributable to the identical stimulation in both tasks. In contrast, the whole-brain multivariate analysis identified feature-specific activation patterns in widespread cortical regions. This suggests that areas beyond the auditory dorsal and ventral streams contribute to working memory processing of auditory stimulus features.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33679316
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.637877
pmc: PMC7933450
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
637877Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Erhart, Czoschke, Fischer, Bledowski and Kaiser.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):816-27
pubmed: 14568454
J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 19;32(38):12983-9
pubmed: 22993415
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Sep;173(4):661-72
pubmed: 16525800
Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb;20(2):207-14
pubmed: 19170936
Neuroimage. 2020 Aug 15;217:116661
pubmed: 32081785
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Oct;21(10):794-815
pubmed: 28774684
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019 Oct;20(10):609-623
pubmed: 31467450
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 2;108(31):12961-6
pubmed: 21768383
Neuron. 2010 Oct 6;68(1):138-48
pubmed: 20920797
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Aug;16(8):997-9
pubmed: 23817547
J Neurosci. 2013 Apr 10;33(15):6516-23
pubmed: 23575849
Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jul;14(7):768-80
pubmed: 15084491
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Feb;6(2):97-107
pubmed: 15654324
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 25;35(8):3360-9
pubmed: 25716836
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 1;106:198-206
pubmed: 25463456
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Dec;2(12):1131-6
pubmed: 10570492
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Jan;19(1):150-7
pubmed: 26595654
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
pubmed: 11994752
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 24;97(22):11800-6
pubmed: 11050212
Neuroimage. 2014 Apr 1;89:345-57
pubmed: 24296330
Neuroimage. 2013 Aug 15;77:157-65
pubmed: 23558095
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 7;103(10):3863-8
pubmed: 16537458
Brain Res. 2016 Jun 1;1640(Pt B):232-42
pubmed: 26683086
Neuroimage. 2004 May;22(1):401-8
pubmed: 15110033
J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 20;36(16):4492-505
pubmed: 27098693
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Feb;21(2):111-124
pubmed: 28063661
J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+
pubmed: 5541744
Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 15;35(3):1192-200
pubmed: 17320413
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 May;17(5):819-31
pubmed: 15904548
Neuron. 2015 Jul 15;87(2):257-70
pubmed: 26182413
Audiol Neurootol. 1998 Mar-Jun;3(2-3):86-103
pubmed: 9575379
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Mar;26(3):1302-1308
pubmed: 26656996
Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):870-88
pubmed: 14568458
Neuroimage. 2011 May 15;56(2):744-52
pubmed: 20406690
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Apr;21(4):494-496
pubmed: 29507410
Science. 2001 Sep 28;293(5539):2425-30
pubmed: 11577229
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2015 Jul 8;38:433-47
pubmed: 25938726
Neuroimage. 2014 Sep;98:506-12
pubmed: 24793832
Neuroscience. 2016 Jul 7;327:79-94
pubmed: 27095712
Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-19
pubmed: 15501092
Front Psychol. 2015 May 11;6:613
pubmed: 26029146
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 5;8(1):10171
pubmed: 29977007
Neuroimage. 2009 Jul 15;46(4):1127-36
pubmed: 19289171
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Feb;20(2):285-95
pubmed: 18275335
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 May 17;:
pubmed: 29771462
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Apr;14(4):172-9
pubmed: 20171926
Neuron. 2015 Aug 19;87(4):893-905
pubmed: 26257053
Brain Res. 2008 Sep 16;1230:202-10
pubmed: 18662678
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Oct 9;98(21):12301-6
pubmed: 11572938
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Jul;27(7):1322-33
pubmed: 25603030
Curr Biol. 2014 Jun 2;24(11):1256-62
pubmed: 24856208
J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 19;32(38):12990-8
pubmed: 22993416
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2014;37:435-56
pubmed: 25002277
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Jan;15(1):1-25
pubmed: 11747097
Neuroimage. 2018 Dec;183:254-262
pubmed: 30107259
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Nov;147(1):8-15
pubmed: 12373363
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jul;34(5):1080-90
pubmed: 17128606
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Mar;22(3):190-192
pubmed: 29475635
Science. 2001 Apr 13;292(5515):290-3
pubmed: 11303104
Neuroimage. 2014 May 1;91:43-51
pubmed: 24480302
J Neurosci. 2002 Jul 1;22(13):5630-8
pubmed: 12097514
Nature. 2009 Apr 2;458(7238):632-5
pubmed: 19225460