Check the diastolic blood pressure twice in aortic dissection as it is associated with prognosis.
Aortic dissection
diattolic blood pressure
prognosis
systolic blood pressure
Journal
Pakistan journal of medical sciences
ISSN: 1682-024X
Titre abrégé: Pak J Med Sci
Pays: Pakistan
ID NLM: 100913117
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
8
3
2021
pubmed:
9
3
2021
medline:
9
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In this study we aimed to determine the prediction level of admission diastolic blood pressure (DBP) on the prognosis and mortality in aortic dissection patients over 65 years old and under 65 years old. We included 72 patients in this retrospective study and study groups were divided into two groups according to 65 age. Demographic data, dissection type (Stanford A-B), DBP, systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arteriel pressure (MAP), heart rate (/min) main complaints, preoperative length of stay, hospitalisation clinic (clinic/intensive care unit), length of hospitaliisation, complications during hospitalisation (renal failure etc..) and the outcome (death/dischargement) results were noted. Preoperative lenth of stay, hospitalisation length, outcome and complications were compared between groups according to SBP, DBP, MAP and heart rate. Mean blood pressure values of the Stanford type B patients over 65 years old were higher than the other group (p<0.05). Fifty percent of patients under 65 years old were discharged but this ratio was 26.9% in the elder group. DBP was positively correlated with preoperative length of stay and hospitalisation length and negatively correlated with mortality. DBP under 65 mmHg was significantly related with high mortality (p<0.05). When the age and presentation time heart rate is added to each other, the values over 142 were significantly related with high mortality (p<0.05). The presentation time vital signs especially the DBP may be helpful for emergency clinicians to predict the prognosis and outcome in aortic dissection patients which has high mortality ratio in patients over 65 years of age.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33679910
doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.2.2877
pii: PJMS-37-339
pmc: PMC7931329
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
339-344Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences.
Références
Lancet. 2016 Oct 29;388(10056):2142-2152
pubmed: 27590221
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Apr 3;71(13):1441-1443
pubmed: 29598864
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Apr 1;89(7):851-5
pubmed: 11909573
Mayo Clin Proc. 2004 Feb;79(2):176-80
pubmed: 14959911
Circulation. 2005 Dec 13;112(24):3802-13
pubmed: 16344407
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 6;55(14):e27-e129
pubmed: 20359588
Circulation. 2006 Dec 12;114(24):2611-8
pubmed: 17145990
Circulation. 2002 Jan 15;105(2):200-6
pubmed: 11790701
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;44(6):1767-80
pubmed: 26705414
Eur Heart J. 2006 Jan;27(1):65-75
pubmed: 16219658
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;145(2):385-390.e1
pubmed: 22341418
Medicine (Baltimore). 1958 Sep;37(3):217-79
pubmed: 13577293
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Apr;107(4):312-318
pubmed: 29164391
Surgery. 1982 Dec;92(6):1118-34
pubmed: 7147190
Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Feb;67(2):593-4
pubmed: 10197712
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jan 15;299:257-262
pubmed: 31350038
Chest. 2000 May;117(5):1271-8
pubmed: 10807810
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Aug;40(2):435-40
pubmed: 21247773
Circulation. 2018 Apr 24;137(17):1846-1860
pubmed: 29685932
JAMA. 2000 Feb 16;283(7):897-903
pubmed: 10685714
Circulation. 2018 Jan 9;137(2):134-143
pubmed: 29021322
JAMA. 2002 May 1;287(17):2262-72
pubmed: 11980527
Circulation. 1995 Nov 1;92(9 Suppl):II113-21
pubmed: 7586393