Accuracy of Soft Tissue Prediction of 2 Virtual Planning Systems in Patients Undergoing Intraoral Quadrangular Le Fort II Osteotomy.


Journal

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 20 08 2020
accepted: 28 10 2020
entrez: 8 3 2021
pubmed: 9 3 2021
medline: 9 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Virtual surgical planning (VSP) is state of the art in routine clinical work. Visualization of soft tissue changes adds important information for surgical planning. The aim of this study was to evaluate accuracy of soft tissue prediction of 2 VSP systems in patients undergoing an intraoral quadrangular Le Fort II osteotomy. VSP was performed with the software application IPS Case Designer (IPS) and Dolphin Imaging 11.95 (DOL) in bone and soft tissue structure. Distances were measured at the 3 levels of the face at the infraorbital rim, the sinus floor, and the lateral incisor level with 2 VSP systems (DOL and IPS). A convenience sample of 19 patients was included in the study with a mean age of 21.9 years. From cranial to caudal, mean differences between simulation and postintervention data were as follows: infraorbital rim level: DOL and ST0: mean difference: 2.90 mm; IPS and ST0: 1.70 mm; sinus floor level: DOL and ST0: mean difference: 3.57 mm; IPS and ST0: 1.34 mm; and lateral incisor level: DOL and ST0: mean difference: 2.48 mm; IPS and ST0: 2.25 mm. Generally, both VSP systems are suitable for planning an intraoral quadrangular Le Fort II osteotomy. Especially in the infraorbital region, improvement of the algorithm is required for trustworthy prediction of soft tissue changes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33680633
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003326
pmc: PMC7929711
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e3326

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Références

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):452.e1-5; discussion 452-3
pubmed: 20362896
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;67(4):751-9
pubmed: 19304030
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul-Dec;4(2):171-5
pubmed: 25593866
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Nov;144(5):654-62
pubmed: 24182581
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987 Mar;45(3):223-32
pubmed: 3546638
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Feb;78(2):286.e1-286.e9
pubmed: 31778641
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Mar 06;3(2):e307
pubmed: 25750846
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Mar;46(3):289-295
pubmed: 27856149
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Nov;26(8):e729-33
pubmed: 26594988
Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):19
pubmed: 27312722
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Feb;76(2):416-425
pubmed: 28822722
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Apr;115(4):382-9
pubmed: 10194281
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Feb;75(2):402.e1-402.e16
pubmed: 27810549
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Apr;43(3):329-35
pubmed: 25637495

Auteurs

Katrin Willinger (K)

University Clinic of Cranio- and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Godoberto Guevara-Rojas (G)

University of Applied Sciences FH Campus Wien, Wien, Austria.

Julia Cede (J)

University Clinic of Cranio- and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Kurt Schicho (K)

University Clinic of Cranio- and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Tanja Stamm (T)

Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems (CeMSIIS), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Clemens Klug (C)

University Clinic of Cranio- and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Classifications MeSH