Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Cohort of Division I NCAA Athletes From a Single Institution.

activity level anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction collegiate athletes return to sport

Journal

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 05 06 2020
accepted: 07 07 2020
entrez: 8 3 2021
pubmed: 9 3 2021
medline: 9 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common in collegiate athletes. The rate of return to the preinjury level of sport activities after ACL reconstruction continues to evolve. The purpose was to determine the return-to-sport rate after ACL reconstruction in a cohort of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes in different sports. It was hypothesized that, with intensive supervision of rehabilitation, the return-to-sport rate would be optimal. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 75 collegiate athletes from a single institution who had undergone unilateral or bilateral ACL reconstruction between 2001 and 2013 and participated in an extensive supervised rehabilitation program. Prospectively collected athlete data as well as data about preinjury exposure, associated lesions, surgical technique, time lost to injury, number of games missed, time to return to full sport activity or retire, and subsequent surgical procedures were extracted from the medical and athletic trainer records. The 75 patients (40 male, 35 female; mean age, 20.1 years) underwent 81 reconstruction procedures (73 primary, 8 revision). The mean follow-up was 19.3 months. The overall return-to-sport rate was 92%. After reconstruction, 9 athletes (12%) retired from collegiate sports, but 3 of them returned to sport activities after graduation. Overall, 8 athletes (11%) experienced an ACL graft retear. The return-to-sport rate in our National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes compared favorably with that reported in other studies in the literature. The strict follow-up by the surgeon, together with the high-profile, almost daily technical and psychological support given mainly by the athletic trainers during the recovery period, may have contributed to preparing the athletes for a competitive rate of return to sport at their preinjury level.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common in collegiate athletes. The rate of return to the preinjury level of sport activities after ACL reconstruction continues to evolve.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS OBJECTIVE
The purpose was to determine the return-to-sport rate after ACL reconstruction in a cohort of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes in different sports. It was hypothesized that, with intensive supervision of rehabilitation, the return-to-sport rate would be optimal.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed the records of 75 collegiate athletes from a single institution who had undergone unilateral or bilateral ACL reconstruction between 2001 and 2013 and participated in an extensive supervised rehabilitation program. Prospectively collected athlete data as well as data about preinjury exposure, associated lesions, surgical technique, time lost to injury, number of games missed, time to return to full sport activity or retire, and subsequent surgical procedures were extracted from the medical and athletic trainer records.
RESULTS RESULTS
The 75 patients (40 male, 35 female; mean age, 20.1 years) underwent 81 reconstruction procedures (73 primary, 8 revision). The mean follow-up was 19.3 months. The overall return-to-sport rate was 92%. After reconstruction, 9 athletes (12%) retired from collegiate sports, but 3 of them returned to sport activities after graduation. Overall, 8 athletes (11%) experienced an ACL graft retear.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The return-to-sport rate in our National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes compared favorably with that reported in other studies in the literature. The strict follow-up by the surgeon, together with the high-profile, almost daily technical and psychological support given mainly by the athletic trainers during the recovery period, may have contributed to preparing the athletes for a competitive rate of return to sport at their preinjury level.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33681400
doi: 10.1177/2325967120982281
pii: 10.1177_2325967120982281
pmc: PMC7900794
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2325967120982281

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: C.M.H. has received hospitality payments from Tornier. M.J.B. has received speaking fees from Arthrex. B.R.W. has received educational support from Wardlow Enterprises and consulting fees and speaking fees from Linvatec. A.A. has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and royalties from Arthrex. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Références

Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):433-9
pubmed: 26637285
Phys Sportsmed. 2011 Sep;39(3):100-10
pubmed: 22030946
N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 13;359(20):2135-42
pubmed: 19005197
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):336-42
pubmed: 24197615
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Nov;40(11):2523-9
pubmed: 22922520
Br J Sports Med. 2011 Jun;45(7):596-606
pubmed: 21398310
Am J Sports Med. 2001 May-Jun;29(3):272-9
pubmed: 11394593
Arthroscopy. 2006 Dec;22(12):1325-30
pubmed: 17157732
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1549-58
pubmed: 23733635
Sports Health. 2009 May;1(3):236-41
pubmed: 23015878
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1638-43
pubmed: 24981340
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):2492-2498
pubmed: 27261476
Sports Health. 2013 Nov;5(6):562-8
pubmed: 24427434
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;50(12):744-50
pubmed: 27034129
Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Mar 03;4(3):2325967116631949
pubmed: 26998501
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Nov;46(13):3307-3316
pubmed: 29028445
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;38(10):2040-50
pubmed: 20709944
Arthroscopy. 2009 Aug;25(8):825-30
pubmed: 19664500
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):895-8
pubmed: 16476911
Br J Sports Med. 2004 Jun;38(3):279-84
pubmed: 15155426
Clin Sports Med. 2007 Oct;26(4):661-81
pubmed: 17920959
Orthopedics. 2014 Aug;37(8):e728-34
pubmed: 25102509
Am J Knee Surg. 2001 Fall;14(4):232-7
pubmed: 11703036
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Feb;49(2):43-54
pubmed: 30501385
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Jan 24;6(1):2325967117750825
pubmed: 29399588
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Jul;34(7):1077-83
pubmed: 16493173
Clin J Sport Med. 2016 Nov;26(6):518-523
pubmed: 27315457
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Oct;28(10):2226-2233
pubmed: 29927499
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Dec;34(12):1911-7
pubmed: 16870822
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):800-7
pubmed: 22238055
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Oct;(367):272-82
pubmed: 10546625
Knee. 2014 Jun;21(3):731-5
pubmed: 24593869
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2102-7
pubmed: 19875359
Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;31(4):564-73
pubmed: 12860546
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Mar;39(3):538-43
pubmed: 21098818
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):959-64
pubmed: 24519183
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2017 May/Jun;16(3):172-178
pubmed: 28498226
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;50(14):853-64
pubmed: 27226389
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Jul;13(5):393-7
pubmed: 15703963
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2008 Jan;37(1):47-9
pubmed: 18309385
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2230-5
pubmed: 22962296
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Oct;14(10):1021-8
pubmed: 16496124
Orthop J Sports Med. 2013 Jul 11;1(2):2325967113497189
pubmed: 26535238
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;52(2):128-138
pubmed: 28223305
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2233-9
pubmed: 20610771
Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Aug 07;2(8):2325967114543901
pubmed: 26535351
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Oct;49(20):1311-5
pubmed: 26036678

Auteurs

Biagio Zampogna (B)

Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery Department, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Sebastiano Vasta (S)

Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery Department, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Guglielmo Torre (G)

Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery Department, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Akhil Gupta (A)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Carolyn M Hettrich (CM)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Matthew J Bollier (MJ)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Brian R Wolf (BR)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Annunziato Amendola (A)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Classifications MeSH