Validation of the cross-cultural adapted Italian version of the Oxford Elbow Score.
Italian translation
Oxford Elbow Score
elbow joint
patient-reported outcome measures
scoring system
validation study
Journal
JSES international
ISSN: 2666-6383
Titre abrégé: JSES Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101763461
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
entrez:
8
3
2021
pubmed:
9
3
2021
medline:
9
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Oxford Elbow Score (OES) is an English-language questionnaire specifically designed to evaluate surgical elbow outcomes. This scoring system has been translated into other languages. Given the lack of an Italian version of the OES, the present study was designed to establish, culturally adapt, and validate the Italian version. The OES questionnaire was culturally adapted to Italian patients in accordance with the literature guidelines with a pilot phase including seven patients with elbow problems and seven healthy subjects. The study includes 110 participants from three hospitals, who underwent elbow surgery for acute (70%) or chronic diseases. At least one month after elbow surgery, at the "index visit", the physician completed the Mayo Elbow Performance Index and patients completed the following questionnaires: the Italian OES, the shortened version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire ( Cronbach's alpha was excellent: 0.86 (0.82-0.90) for OES pain, 0.92 (0.90-0.94) for OES function, and 0.90 (0.87-0.93) for OES social/psychological. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.94 (0.78-0.98) for OES pain, 0.91 (0.71-0.97) for OES function, 0.95 (0.83-0.98) for OES social-psychological and 0.93 (0.76-0.98) for OES total. The Spearman ρ was >0.7 for OES pain and This study demonstrates that the Italian version of the OES, translated in accordance with the international standardized guidelines, is reliable, valid, and responsive in patients who have undergone elbow surgery.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Oxford Elbow Score (OES) is an English-language questionnaire specifically designed to evaluate surgical elbow outcomes. This scoring system has been translated into other languages. Given the lack of an Italian version of the OES, the present study was designed to establish, culturally adapt, and validate the Italian version.
METHODS
METHODS
The OES questionnaire was culturally adapted to Italian patients in accordance with the literature guidelines with a pilot phase including seven patients with elbow problems and seven healthy subjects. The study includes 110 participants from three hospitals, who underwent elbow surgery for acute (70%) or chronic diseases. At least one month after elbow surgery, at the "index visit", the physician completed the Mayo Elbow Performance Index and patients completed the following questionnaires: the Italian OES, the shortened version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (
RESULTS
RESULTS
Cronbach's alpha was excellent: 0.86 (0.82-0.90) for OES pain, 0.92 (0.90-0.94) for OES function, and 0.90 (0.87-0.93) for OES social/psychological. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.94 (0.78-0.98) for OES pain, 0.91 (0.71-0.97) for OES function, 0.95 (0.83-0.98) for OES social-psychological and 0.93 (0.76-0.98) for OES total. The Spearman ρ was >0.7 for OES pain and
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates that the Italian version of the OES, translated in accordance with the international standardized guidelines, is reliable, valid, and responsive in patients who have undergone elbow surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33681858
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.025
pii: S2666-6383(20)30211-5
pmc: PMC7910718
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
328-333Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Author(s).
Références
J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 Jul 30;6:39
pubmed: 21801443
J Hand Ther. 2006 Apr-Jun;19(2):82-97
pubmed: 16713858
Orthopade. 2016 Aug;45(8):695-700
pubmed: 27385387
Iran J Med Sci. 2015 Sep;40(5):404-10
pubmed: 26379346
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Mar;23(3):308-12
pubmed: 24524980
J Hand Surg Br. 2003 Apr;28(2):179-86
pubmed: 12631494
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
Behav Genet. 2002 Mar;32(2):153-61
pubmed: 12036113
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Dec;81(12 Suppl 2):S15-20
pubmed: 11128900
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Apr;27(4):e98-e106
pubmed: 29444754
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Sep 01;11(1):95
pubmed: 27586810
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jun;29(6):1223-1229
pubmed: 32245727
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1025-36
pubmed: 9817120
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Jan;39(1):100-7
pubmed: 24268831
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 Sep;95(6):415-7
pubmed: 24025290
Gac Sanit. 2005 Nov-Dec;19(6):433-9
pubmed: 16483520
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91
pubmed: 11124735
Qual Life Res. 2008 Dec;17(10):1257-67
pubmed: 18958582
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003 Jun 16;4:11
pubmed: 12809562
Dan Med J. 2013 Oct;60(10):A4714
pubmed: 24083528
Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S178-89
pubmed: 2646488
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Oct;22(10):1380-94
pubmed: 23790677
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Apr;90(4):466-73
pubmed: 18378921
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0182557
pubmed: 28886018
Br Med Bull. 2008;87:131-61
pubmed: 18539627