Migrating Whooping Cranes avoid wind-energy infrastructure when selecting stopover habitat.
Grus americana
Whooping Crane
avoidance
displacement
endangered species
habitat selection
migration
renewable energy
wind energy
zone of influence
Journal
Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America
ISSN: 1051-0761
Titre abrégé: Ecol Appl
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9889808
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
revised:
23
10
2020
received:
29
07
2020
accepted:
06
12
2020
pubmed:
9
3
2021
medline:
12
8
2021
entrez:
8
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Electricity generation from renewable-energy sources has increased dramatically worldwide in recent decades. Risks associated with wind-energy infrastructure are not well understood for endangered Whooping Cranes (Grus americana) or other vulnerable Crane populations. From 2010 to 2016, we monitored 57 Whooping Cranes with remote-telemetry devices in the United States Great Plains to determine potential changes in migration distribution (i.e., avoidance) caused by presence of wind-energy infrastructure. During our study, the number of wind towers tripled in the Whooping Crane migration corridor and quadrupled in the corridor's center. Median distance of Whooping Crane locations from nearest wind tower was 52.1 km, and 99% of locations were >4.3 km from wind towers. A habitat selection analysis revealed that Whooping Cranes used areas ≤5.0 km (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.8-5.4) from towers less than expected (i.e., zone of influence) and that Whooping Cranes were 20 times (95% CI 14-64) more likely to use areas outside compared to adjacent to towers. Eighty percent of Whooping Crane locations and 20% of wind towers were located in areas with the highest relative probability of Whooping Crane use based on our model, which comprised 20% of the study area. Whooping Cranes selected for these places, whereas developers constructed wind infrastructure at random relative to desirable Whooping Crane habitat. As of early 2020, 4.6% of the study area and 5.0% of the highest-selected Whooping Crane habitat were within the collective zone of influence. The affected area equates to habitat loss ascribed to wind-energy infrastructure; losses from other disturbances have not been quantified. Continued growth of the Whooping Crane population during this period of wind infrastructure construction suggests no immediate population-level consequences. Chronic or lag effects of habitat loss are unknown but possible for long-lived species. Preferentially constructing future wind infrastructure outside of the migration corridor or inside of the corridor at sites with low probability of Whooping Crane use would allow for continued wind-energy development in the Great Plains with minimal additional risk to highly selected habitat that supports recovery of this endangered species.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e02324Informations de copyright
© 2021 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Ecological Applications © 2021 Ecological Society of America. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
Références
Allen, R. P. 1952. The whooping crane. National Audubon Society, New York, New York, USA.
Allison, T. D., et al. 2019. Impacts to wildlife of wind energy siting and operation in the United States. Issues in Ecology 21:1-24.
Armbruster, M. J. 1990. Characterization of habitat used by whooping cranes during migration. Biological Report 90. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C., USA.
Austin, J. E., and A. L. Richert. 2005. Patterns of habitat use by whooping cranes during migration: summary from 1977-1999 site evaluation data. Pages 79-104 in F. Chavez-Ramirez, editor. Proceedings of the North American Crane Workshop 9. North American Crane Working Group, Baraboo, Wisconsin, USA.
Avgar, T., J. R. Potts, M. A. Lewis, and M. S. Boyce. 2016. Integrated step selection analysis: bridging the gap between resource selection and animal movement. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7:619-630.
Baasch, D. M., P. D. Farrell, S. Howlin, A. T. Pearse, J. M. Farnsworth, and C. B. Smith. 2019a. Whooping crane use of riverine stopover sites. PLoS ONE 14:e0209612.
Baasch, D. M., P. D. Farrell, A. T. Pearse, D. A. Brandt, A. J. Caven, M. J. Harner, G. D. Wright, and K. L. Metzger. 2019b. Diurnal habitat selection of migrating whooping crane in the Great Plains. Avian Conservation and Ecology 14:6.
Boulanger, J., K. G. Poole, A. Gunn, and J. Wierzchowski. 2012. Estimating the zone of influence of industrial developments on wildlife: a migratory caribou Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus and diamond mine case study. Wildlife Biology 18:164-179.
Boyce, M. S., P. R. Vernier, S. E. Nielsen, and F. K. Schmiegelow. 2002. Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecological Modelling 157:281-300.
Bring, J. 1994. How to standardize regression coefficients. American Statistician 48:209-213.
Brooks, M. E., K. Kristensen, K. J. van Benthem, A. Magnusson, C. W. Berg, A. Nielsen, H. J. Skaug, M. Maechler, and B. M. Bolker. 2017. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R Journal 9:378-400.
Brooks, T. M., et al. 2002. Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 16:909-923.
Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2003. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
Byrne, M. E., A. E. Holland, A. L. Bryan, and J. C. Beasley. 2017. Environmental conditions and animal behavior influence performance of solar-powered GPS-GSM transmitters. Condor 119:389-404.
Cabrera-Cruz, S. A., and R. Villegas-Patraca. 2016. Response of migrating raptors to an increasing number of wind farms. Journal of Applied Ecology 53:1667-1675.
Canadian Wildlife Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. International recovery plan for the whooping crane. Recovery of Nationally Endangered Wildlife (RENEW), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Canadian Wind Energy Association. 2020. Wind energy in Saskatchewan. https://canwea.ca/wind-energy/saskatchewan/
Caven, A. J., M. Rabbe, J. Malzahn, and A. E. Lacy. 2020. Trends in the occurrence of large whooping crane groups during migration in the Great Plains, USA. Helivon 6:e03549.
Chamberlain, D. E., M. R. Rehfisch, A. D. Fox, M. Desholm, and S. J. Anthony. 2006. The effect of avoidance rates on bird mortality predictions made by wind turbine collision risk models. Ibis 148:198-202.
Cody, M. L. 1981. Habitat selection in birds: the roles of vegetation structure, competitors, and productivity. BioScience 31:107-113.
Devereux, C. L., M. J. H. Denny, and M. J. Whittingham. 2008. Minimal effects of wind turbines on the distribution of wintering farmland birds. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:1689-1694.
Dincer, F. 2011. The analysis on wind energy electricity generation status, potential and policies in the world. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15:5135-5142.
Dohm, R., C. S. Jennelle, J. C. Garvin, and D. Drake. 2019. A long-term assessment of raptor displacement at a wind farm. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 17:433-438.
Drewitt, A. L., and R. H. W. Langston. 2006. Assessing the impacts of wind farms on birds. Ibis 148:29-42.
Duchesne, T., D. Fortin, and N. Courbin. 2010. Mixed conditional logistic regression for habitat selection studies. Journal of Animal Ecology 79:548-555.
Duchesne, T., D. Fortin, and L.-P. Rivest. 2015. Equivalence between step selection functions and biased correlated random walks for statistical inference on animal movement. PLoS ONE 10:e0122947.
Farfán, M. A., J. Duarte, R. Real, A. R. Muñoz, J. E. Fa, and J. M. Vargas. 2017. Differential recovery of habitat use by birds after wind farm installation: a multi-year comparison. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 64:8-15.
Fargione, J., J. Kiesecker, M. J. Slaats, and S. Olimb. 2012. Wind and wildlife in the northern Great Plains: identifying low-impact areas for wind development. PLoS ONE 7:e41468.
Federal Aviation Administration. 2020. Digital obstacle file (DOF). https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dof/
Fernández-Bellon, D., M. W. Wilson, S. Irwin, and J. O’Halloran. 2018. Effects of development of wind energy and associated changes in land use on bird densities in upland areas. Conservation Biology 33:413-422.
Ficetola, G. F., and M. Denoel. 2009. Ecological thresholds: an assessment of methods to identify abrupt changes in species-habitat relationships. Ecography 32:1075-1084.
Fijn, R. C., K. L. Krijgsveld, W. Tijsen, H. A. M. Prinsen, and S. Dirksen. 2012. Habitat use, disturbance and collision risks for Bewick’s swans Cygnus columbianus bewickii wintering near a wind farm in the Netherlands. Wildfowl 62:97-116.
Folk, M. J., S. A. Nesbitt, S. T. Schwiker, J. A. Schmidt, K. A. Sullivan, T. J. Miller, S. B. Baynes, and J. M. Parker. 2005. Techniques employed to capture whooping cranes in central Florida. Proceedings of the North American Crane Workshop 9:141-144.
Forester, J. D., H. K. Im, and P. J. Rathouz. 2009. Accounting for animal movement in estimation of resource selection functions: sampling and data analysis. Ecology 90:3554-3565.
Fortin, M.-J., T. H. Keitt, B. A. Maurer, M. L. Taper, D. M. Kaufman, and T. M. Blackburn. 2005. Species’ geographic ranges and distributional limits: pattern analysis and statistical issues. Oikos 108:7-17.
Gibson, L., E. N. Wilman, and W. F. Laurance. 2017. How green is “green” energy? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32:922-935.
Gómez-Catasús, J., V. Garza, and J. Traba. 2018. Wind farms affect the occurrence, abundance and population trends of small passerine birds: the case of the Dupont’s lark. Journal of Applied Ecology 55:2033-2042.
Hagen, C. A., B. E. Jamison, K. M. Giesen, and T. Z. Riley. 2004. Guidelines for managing lesser prairie-chicken populations and their habitats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32:69-82.
Harris, J., and C. Mirande. 2013. A global overview of cranes: status, threats and conservation priorities. Chinese Birds 4:189-209.
Heuck, C., C. Herrmann, C. Levers, P. J. Leitão, O. Krone, R. Brandl, and J. Albrecht. 2019. Wind turbines in high quality habitat cause disproportionate increases in collision mortality of the white-tailed eagle. Biological Conservation 236:44-51.
Hoen, B. D., J. E. Diffendorfer, J. T. Rand, L. A. Kramer, C. P. Garrity, and H. E. Hunt. 2018. United States Wind Turbine Database (ver. 2.3, January 2020). U.S. Geological Survey, American Wind Energy Association, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory data release. https://eerscmap.usgs.gov/uswtdb/
Holbrock, J. D., J. R. Squires, L. E. Olson, N. J. DeCesare, and R. L. Lawrence. 2017. Understanding and predicting habitat for wildlife conservation: the case of Canada lynx at the range periphery. Ecosphere 8:e01939.
Howe, M. A. 1989. Migration of radio-marked whooping cranes from the Aransas-Wood Buffalo Population: Patterns of habitat use, behavior, and survival. Technical report 21. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C., USA.
Hutto, R. L. 1998. On the importance of stopover sites to migrating birds. Auk 115:823-825.
IEA Wind. 2017. Canada 2017 annual report. https://community.ieawind.org/publications/ar
Johns, B. W., E. J. Woodsworth, and E. A. Driver. 1997. Habitat use by migrant whooping cranes in Saskatchewan. Proceedings of the North American Crane Workshop 7:123-131.
Kiesecker, J. M., J. S. Evans, J. Fargione, K. Doherty, K. R. Foresman, T. H. Kunz, D. Naugle, N. P. Nibbelink, and N. D. Niemuth. 2011. Win-win for wind and wildlife: a vision to facilitate sustainable development. PLoS ONE 6:e17566.
Kuyt, E. 1979. Banding of juvenile whooping cranes on the breeding range in the Northwest Territories, Canada. North American Bird Bander 4:24-25.
Kuyt, E. 1992. Aerial radio-tracking of whooping cranes migrating between Wood Buffalo National Park and Aransas National Wildlife Refuge, 1981-84. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lange, C. J., B. M. Ballard, and D. P. Collins. 2018. Impacts of wind turbines on redheads in the Laguna Madre. Journal of Wildlife Management 82:531-537.
Larsen, J. K., and J. Madsen. 2000. Effects of wind turbines and other physical elements on field utilization by pink-footed geese (Anser brachyrhynchus): a landscape perspective. Landscape Ecology 15:755-764.
Laubhan, M. K., and L. H. Fredrickson. 1997. Wetlands of the Great Plains: habitat characteristics and vertebrate aggregations. Pages 20-48 in F. L. Knopf and F. B. Samson, editors. Ecology and conservation of great plains vertebrates. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
Livneh, B., and M. P. Hoerling. 2016. The physics of drought in the U.S. central Great Plains. Journal of Climate 29:6783-6804.
Madsen, J., and D. Boertmann. 2008. Animal behavioral adaptation to changing landscapes: spring-staging geese habituate to wind farms. Landscape Ecology 23:1007-1011.
Marques, A. T., C. D. Santos, F. Hanssen, A.-R. Muñoz, A. Onrubia, M. Wikelski, F. Moreira, J. M. Palmeirim, and J. P. Silva. 2020. Wind turbines cause functional habitat loss for migratory soaring birds. Journal of Animal Ecology 89:93-103.
Matthews, W. J. 1988. North American prairie streams as systems for ecological study. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7:387-409.
May, R. F. 2015. A unifying framework for the underlying mechanisms of avian avoidance of wind turbines. Biological Conservation 190:179-187.
McNew, L. B., L. M. Hunt, A. J. Gregory, S. M. Wisley, and B. K. Sandercock. 2014. Effects of wind energy development on nesting ecology of greater prairie-chickens in fragmented grasslands. Conservation Biology 28:1089-1099.
Mendel, B., P. Schwemmer, V. Peschko, S. Müller, H. Schwemmer, M. Mercker, and S. Garthe. 2019. Operational offshore wind farms and associated ship traffic cause profound changes in distribution patterns of loons (Gavia spp.). Journal of Environmental Management 231:429-438.
Muff, S., J. Signer, and J. Fieberg. 2020. Accounting for individual-specific variation in habitat-selection studies: Efficient estimation of mixed-effects models using Bayesian or frequentist computation. Journal of Animal Ecology 89:80-92.
Navarrete, L. M. 2011. Behavioral effects of wind farms on wintering sandhill cranes Grus canadensis on the Texas High Plains. Dissertation. Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Navarrete, L., and K. L. Griffis-Kyle. 2014. Sandhill crane collisions with wind turbines in Texas. Proceedings of the North American Crane Workshop 12:65-67.
Niemuth, N. D., A. J. Ryba, A. T. Pearse, S. M. Kvas, D. A. Brandt, B. Wangler, J. E. Austin, and M. J. Carlisle. 2018. Opportunistically collected data reveal habitat selection by migrating whooping cranes in the U.S. northern plains. Condor 120:343-356.
Norris, D. R. 2005. Carry-over effects and habitat quality in migratory populations. Oikos 109:178-186.
Pearce-Higgins, J. W., L. Stephen, A. Douse, and R. H. Langston. 2012. Greater impacts of wind farms on bird populations during construction than subsequent operation: results of a multi-site and multi-species analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology 49:386-394.
Pearce-Higgins, J. W., L. Stephen, R. H. W. Langston, I. P. Bainbridge, and R. Bullman. 2009. The distribution of breeding birds around upland wind farms. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:1323-1331.
Pearse, A. T., D. A. Brandt, W. C. Harrell, K. L. Metzger, D. M. Baasch, and T. J. Hefley. 2015. Whooping crane stopover site use intensity within the Great Plains. Open-file Report 2015-1166. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, USA.
Pearse, A. T., D. A. Brandt, and G. L. Krapu. 2016. Wintering sandhill crane exposure to wind energy development in the central and southern Great Plains, USA. Condor 118:391-401.
Pearse, A. T., D. A. Brandt, K. L. Metzger, M. T. Bidwell, and W. Harrell. 2020a. Whooping crane migration habitat selection data and distance to wind-energy infrastructure, 2010-2016. U.S. Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9SVV311
Pearse, A. T., K. L. Metzger, D. A. Brandt, M. T. Bidwell, M. J. Harner, D. M. Baasch, and W. Harrell. 2020b. Heterogeneity in migration strategies of whooping cranes. Condor 122:1-15.
Pearse, A. T., M. J. Harner, D. M. Baasch, G. D. Wright, A. J. Caven, and K. L. Metzger. 2017. Evaluation of nocturnal roost and diurnal sites used by whooping cranes in the Great Plains, United States. Open-file Report 2016-1209. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, USA.
Pearse, A. T., M. Rabbe, L. M. Juliusson, M. T. Bidwell, L. Craig-Moore, D. A. Brandt, and W. Harrell. 2018. Delineating and identifying long-term changes in the whooping crane (Grus americana) migration corridor. PLoS ONE 13:e0192737.
Polfus, J. L., M. Hebblewhite, and K. Heinemeyer. 2011. Identifying indirect habitat loss and avoidance of human infrastructure by northern mountain woodland caribou. Biological Conservation 144:2637-2646.
R Core Team. 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org
Reidmiller, D. R., C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E. Kunkel, K. L. M. Lewis, T. K. Maycock, and B. C. Stewart, editors. 2018. Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, D.C., USA. https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA4.2018
Samson, F. B., F. L. Knopf, and W. R. Ostlie. 2004. Great Plains ecosystems: past, present, and future. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32:6-15.
Sawyer, H., M. J. Kauffman, R. M. Nielson, and J. S. Horne. 2009. Identifying and prioritizing ungulate migration routes for landscape-level conservation. Ecological Applications 19:2016-2025.
Sawyer, H., N. M. Korfanta, R. M. Nielson, K. L. Monteith, and D. Strickland. 2017. Mule deer and energy development-long-term trends of habituation and abundance. Global Change Biology 23:4521-4529.
Service Argos. 2001. Argos user’s manual. Service Argos, Landover, Maryland, USA.
Shaffer, J. A., and D. A. Buhl. 2016. Effects of wind-energy facilities on breeding grassland bird distributions. Conservation Biology 30:59-71.
Smith, J. A., and J. F. Dwyer. 2016. Avian interactions with renewable energy infrastructure: an update. Condor 118:411-423.
Stehn, T. V., and C. L. Haralson-Strobel. 2014. An update on mortality of fledged whooping cranes in the Aransas-Wood Buffalo population. Proceedings of the North American Crane Workshop 12:43-50.
Thompson, P. M., and J. C. Ollason. 2001. Lagged effects of ocean climate change on fulmar population dynamics. Nature 413:417-420.
Toms, J. D., and M. L. Lesperance. 2003. Piecewise regression: a tool for identifying ecological thresholds. Ecology 84:2034-2041.
U.S. Department of Energy. 2008. 20% wind energy by 2030: Increasing Wind Energy’s Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply. U.S. Department of Energy, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Washington, D.C., USA.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2020. National Wetlands Inventory-Version 2-Surface Waters and Wetlands Inventory. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C., USA.
U.S. Geological Survey. 2014. USGS National Transportation Dataset (NTD) Downloadable Data Collection. http://nationalmap.gov/transport.html
Venter, O., et al. 2016. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nature Communications 7:12558.
Webster, M. S., P. P. Marra, S. M. Haig, S. Bensch, and R. T. Holmes. 2002. Links between worlds: unraveling migratory connectivity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:76-83.
Wilson, S., K. C. Gil-Weir, R. G. Clark, G. J. Robertson, and M. T. Bidwell. 2016. Integrated population modeling to assess demographic variation and contributions to population growth for endangered whooping cranes. Biological Conservation 197:1-7.
Winder, V. L., A. J. Gregory, L. B. McNew, and B. K. Sandercock. 2015. Responses of male greater prairie-chickens to wind energy development. Condor 117:284-296.
Winder, V. L., L. B. McNew, A. J. Gregory, L. M. Hunt, S. M. Wisely, and B. K. Sandercock. 2014a. Effects of wind energy development on survival of female greater prairie-chickens. Journal of Applied Ecology 51:395-405.
Winder, V., L. McNew, A. Gregory, L. Hunt, S. M. Wisely, and B. K. Sandercock. 2014b. Space use by female greater prairie-chickens in response to wind energy development. Ecosphere 5:1-17.
Yang, L., et al. 2018. A new generation of the United States National Land Cover Database-Requirements, research priorities, design, and implementation strategies. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 146:108-123.