A comparison of piezo surgery osteotomies with conventional internal osteotomies as performed by trainee surgeons: a cadaveric study.
Human cadaver study
Lateral nasal osteotomy
Piezo surgery
Rhinoplasty
Journal
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
ISSN: 1478-7083
Titre abrégé: Ann R Coll Surg Engl
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7506860
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
9
3
2021
medline:
10
4
2021
entrez:
8
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Aesthetic rhinoplasty remains a challenging procedure with high expectations and narrow tolerance for errors. Considerable training is required to achieve controlled and reliable results. Use of the Piezotome is gaining popularity for performing the nasal osteotomies, a key step in rhinoplasty, where it is reported to improve precision and predictability and to keep tissue damage to a minimum. We compare the outcomes of conventional osteotomy techniques to piezosurgery in human cadavers as undertaken by surgical trainees. Seven human cadavers were used and a total of 14 osteotomies were performed. Conventional osteotomies and piezosurgery were carried out each on one side of the cadaver. A number of fragments and a blinded assessment of the accuracy of the osteotomy compared with the preprocedure skin markings were carried out by two experienced rhinoplasty surgeons. The Mann-Whitney test for statistical analysis was used. The mean number of fragments was 1.57 in the piezosurgery osteotomy and 2.14 using conventional osteotomies. Four of seven piezosurgery osteotomies achieved an accuracy within 1mm. The conventional osteotomies as performed by the trainees showed a significant mismatch of more than 3mm in three of seven of cases. Accuracy within 1mm was achieved in one of seven cases. Piezosurgery offers a safe, reliable and precise method of performing lateral nasal osteotomies. This human cadaver study shows a high accuracy of osteotomy and fewer comminuted fractures using this technique compared with conventional osteotomy techniques.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33682473
doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7120
pmc: PMC10335209
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
272-277Références
Aesthet Surg J. 2005 Nov-Dec;25(6):643-5
pubmed: 19338873
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Apr;99(5):1309-12; discussion 1313
pubmed: 9105357
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Dec;108(7):2114-9; discussion 2120-1
pubmed: 11743413
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Sep;124(3):952-954
pubmed: 19730317
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981 Mar;51(3):236-42
pubmed: 6938883
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Jan;72(1):107-113
pubmed: 30243555
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1975 Apr;39(4):536-46
pubmed: 1054461
Laryngoscope. 2020 May;130(5):1158-1165
pubmed: 31758577
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001 Dec;21(6):561-7
pubmed: 11794567
Laryngoscope. 1987 Jun;97(6):746-7
pubmed: 3586820
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Mar;70(1):38-42
pubmed: 29456941
Head Face Med. 2013 Dec 19;9:41
pubmed: 24354807
J Laryngol Otol. 2017 Jul;131(S2):S12-S18
pubmed: 28412983
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000 Aug;20(4):358-65
pubmed: 11203575
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;71(12):2155.e1-6
pubmed: 24075234
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;41(2):e33-8
pubmed: 22890087
J Craniofac Surg. 2007 Sep;18(5):1098-100
pubmed: 17912092
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jun;18(6):627-33
pubmed: 23560712
Clin Otolaryngol. 2019 Nov;44(6):968-974
pubmed: 31436019
Am J Otolaryngol. 2010 May-Jun;31(3):150-3
pubmed: 20015732
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993 Jun;119(6):624-7
pubmed: 8499091
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Apr 12;7:36
pubmed: 16611362
Am J Otolaryngol. 2017 Jul - Aug;38(4):498-500
pubmed: 28476442
Microvasc Res. 2014 Jul;94:114-8
pubmed: 24933582
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Apr 15;113(5):1445-56; discussion 1457-8
pubmed: 15060361
Am J Otolaryngol. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):666-71
pubmed: 26122743
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jul;130(1):224e-226e
pubmed: 22743940
J Surg Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;70(4):466-74
pubmed: 23725934
Aesthet Surg J. 2010 Nov-Dec;30(6):810-3
pubmed: 21131454