Shared care plan: an extraordinary tool for the personalization of medicine and respect for self-determination.
Journal
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
ISSN: 2531-6745
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomed
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101295064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 04 2020
29 04 2020
Historique:
received:
22
04
2020
accepted:
28
04
2020
entrez:
8
3
2021
pubmed:
9
3
2021
medline:
4
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
On 22 December 2017, Law No. 219 was approved in Italy. This law provides citizens with effective tools with which to express healthcare decisions: namely, advance treatment directives (ATD) and shared care plans (SCP). This article presents an analysis of 70 SCP cases carried out in a tertiary hospital in Italy during the period between 01.02.2018 and 29.02.2020 inclusive. In 90% of cases, the objective of the plan pertained to situations regarding patients' refusal of transfusions of blood components, the majority (97%) due to their belonging to the religious movement of Jehovah's Witnesses. 46% of the sample had drafted ATDs. The course of treatment recommended by the attending physicians was confirmed in 93% of the SCP cases. Trustees were appointed in 96% of cases. In 55% of cases, patients assigned trustees with attestative functions and the remaining 45% with creative functions. The results demonstrate that each patient personally dictates his or her wishes and the role assigned to the trustee. SCP meetings serve as a useful tool for providing the patient and his or her relatives with information, and for appointing a trustee. However, it has never been necessary to solicit the intervention of the trustee following a surgical operation. The SCP has proven to be an essential tool in achieving the objective of personalised medicine. However, there is still notable passivity in its application. Further effort is required in order for it to become a common asset in clinical practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
On 22 December 2017, Law No. 219 was approved in Italy. This law provides citizens with effective tools with which to express healthcare decisions: namely, advance treatment directives (ATD) and shared care plans (SCP).
METHODS
This article presents an analysis of 70 SCP cases carried out in a tertiary hospital in Italy during the period between 01.02.2018 and 29.02.2020 inclusive.
RESULTS
In 90% of cases, the objective of the plan pertained to situations regarding patients' refusal of transfusions of blood components, the majority (97%) due to their belonging to the religious movement of Jehovah's Witnesses. 46% of the sample had drafted ATDs. The course of treatment recommended by the attending physicians was confirmed in 93% of the SCP cases. Trustees were appointed in 96% of cases. In 55% of cases, patients assigned trustees with attestative functions and the remaining 45% with creative functions. The results demonstrate that each patient personally dictates his or her wishes and the role assigned to the trustee. SCP meetings serve as a useful tool for providing the patient and his or her relatives with information, and for appointing a trustee. However, it has never been necessary to solicit the intervention of the trustee following a surgical operation.
CONCLUSIONS
The SCP has proven to be an essential tool in achieving the objective of personalised medicine. However, there is still notable passivity in its application. Further effort is required in order for it to become a common asset in clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33682824
doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i1.9597
pmc: PMC7975960
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2021001Références
Minerva Anestesiol. 2011 Sep;77(9):911-20
pubmed: 21878873
Oncologist. 2011;16 Suppl 3:3-11
pubmed: 21930829
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb 1;19(1):85
pubmed: 30709359
Minerva Anestesiol. 2010 Mar;76(3):203-8
pubmed: 20203548
Minerva Anestesiol. 2019 Apr;85(4):338-341
pubmed: 30977352
J Crit Care. 2018 Dec;48:178-182
pubmed: 30216936
Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Sep 10;231(1-3):e24-9
pubmed: 23791429
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Mar;27(1):69-84
pubmed: 23590917
Clin Ter. 2020 Mar-Apr;171(2):e94-e96
pubmed: 32141477
Minerva Anestesiol. 2019 Apr;85(4):401-411
pubmed: 30460836
Clin Ter. 2018 Mar-Apr;169(2):e77-e81
pubmed: 29595870
Intensive Care Med. 2011 Mar;37(3):542-9
pubmed: 21287145
Blood Transfus. 2019 May;17(3):191-195
pubmed: 31246561
Recenti Prog Med. 2018 May;109(5):267-271
pubmed: 29771249
Blood Transfus. 2017 Jul;15(4):325-328
pubmed: 28488975
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Mar 4;20(1):17
pubmed: 30832644