Aortic root measurement on CT: linear dimensions, aortic root area and comparison with echocardiography. A retrospective cross sectional study.
Journal
The British journal of radiology
ISSN: 1748-880X
Titre abrégé: Br J Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2021
01 May 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
9
3
2021
medline:
1
5
2021
entrez:
8
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We sought to assess the different CT aortic root measurements and determine their relationship to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). TTE and ECG-gated CT images were reviewed from 70 consecutive patients (mean age 54 ± 18 years; 67% male) with tricuspid aortic roots (trileaflet aortic valves) between Nov 2009 and Dec 2013. Three CT planes (coronal, short axis en face and three-chamber) were used for measurement of nine linear dimensions. TTE aortic root dimension was measured as per guidelines from the parasternal long axis view. All CT short axis measurements of the aortic root had excellent reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC 0.96-0.99), while coronal and three-chamber planes had lower reproducibility with ICC 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.94) and ICC 0.92 (0.87-0.95) respectively. CT coronal and short axis maximal dimensions were systematically larger than TTE (mean 2 mm larger, Systematic differences exist between CT and TTE dependent on the CT plane of measurement. All CT short axis measurements of the aortic root had excellent reproducibility and correlation with aortic root area with maximal dimension appearing marginally better than the rest. Our findings highlight the importance of specifying the chosen plane of aortic root measurement on CT. Systematic differences in aortic root dimension exist between TTE and the various CT measurement planes. CT coronal and short axis maximal dimensions were systematically larger than TTE, while CT cusp to commissure measurements were smaller. CT readers should indicate the plane of measurement and the specific linear dimension to avoid ambiguity in follow-up and comparison.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33684302
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201232
pmc: PMC8506173
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20201232Références
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2008 Sep-Oct;2(5):298-308
pubmed: 19083966
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 May;1(3):321-30
pubmed: 19356444
Circulation. 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266-369
pubmed: 20233780
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1995 Nov-Dec;8(6):793-800
pubmed: 8611279
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2013 Aug 13;11:28
pubmed: 23941562
Circulation. 1995 Feb 1;91(3):734-40
pubmed: 7828301
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Feb;28(2):119-82
pubmed: 25623219
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Dec;27(8):1195-204
pubmed: 21359833
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Feb;123(2):360-1
pubmed: 11828302
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jun;200(6):W581-92
pubmed: 23701088
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Sep;92(3):904-12
pubmed: 21723533
J Thorac Imaging. 2009 Aug;24(3):223-6
pubmed: 19704327
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Jan;32(1):105-112
pubmed: 30269911
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Jun;123(6):1060-6
pubmed: 12063451
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Feb;157(2):479-486
pubmed: 30227996
J Heart Valve Dis. 2014 Jan;23(1):17-24
pubmed: 24779324
Circulation. 2016 Nov 29;134(22):1724-1737
pubmed: 27770001
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Sep;126(3):892-3
pubmed: 14502185
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Jul;30(7):625-635
pubmed: 28501375
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jan;28(1):1-39.e14
pubmed: 25559473
Am J Cardiol. 1989 Sep 1;64(8):507-12
pubmed: 2773795
Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 1;35(41):2873-926
pubmed: 25173340
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Nov;27(11):1143-52
pubmed: 25155517