Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation or surveillance in patients with Barrett's oesophagus with confirmed low-grade dysplasia: a multicentre randomised trial.
Adenocarcinoma
/ diagnostic imaging
Aged
Barrett Esophagus
/ diagnostic imaging
Disease Progression
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Esophageal Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Hospitals, High-Volume
Hospitals, Low-Volume
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Radiofrequency Ablation
/ adverse effects
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Watchful Waiting
Barrett's oesophagus
dysplasia
endoscopic procedures
oesophageal cancer
Journal
Gut
ISSN: 1468-3288
Titre abrégé: Gut
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985108R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
received:
03
06
2020
revised:
25
02
2021
accepted:
27
02
2021
pubmed:
10
3
2021
medline:
12
1
2022
entrez:
9
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Due to an annual progression rate of Barrett's oesophagus (BO) with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) between 9% and 13% per year endoscopic ablation therapy is preferred to surveillance. Since this recommendation is based on only one randomised trial, we aimed at checking these results by another multicentre randomised trial with a similar design. A prospective randomised study was performed in 14 centres comparing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (maximum of 4 sessions) to annual endoscopic surveillance, including patients with a confirmed diagnosis of BO with LGD. Primary outcome was the prevalence of LGD at 3 years. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of LGD at 1 year, the complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) at 3 years, the rate of neoplastic progression at 3 years and the treatment-related morbidity. 125 patients were initially included, of whom 82 with confirmed LGD (76 men, mean age 62.3 years) were finally randomised, 40 patients in the RFA and 42 in the surveillance group. At 3 years, CE-IM rates were 35% vs 0% in the RFA and surveillance groups, respectively (p<0.001). At the same time, the prevalence LGD was 34.3% (95% CI 18.6 to 50.0) in the RFA group vs 58.1% (95% CI 40.7 to 75.4) in the surveillance group (OR=0.38 (95% CI 0.14 to 1.02), p=0.05). Neoplastic progression was found in 12.5% (RFA) vs 26.2% (surveillance; p=0.15). The complication rate was maximal after the first RFA treatment (16.9%). RFA modestly reduced the prevalence of LGD as well as progression risk at 3 years. The risk-benefit balance of endoscopic ablation therapy should therefore be carefully weighted against surveillance in patients with BO with confirmed LGD. NCT01360541.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33685969
pii: gutjnl-2020-322082
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322082
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01360541']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1014-1022Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: MBa: Norgine (consulting), Medtronic (teaching), 3D Matrix (research grant). MP: Norgine (consulting), 3D matrix (consulting), Boston Scientific (consulting), Cook Medical (training). ECo: AbbVie (teaching), Fujifilm (consulting), Mayoly-Spindler (teaching), Medtronic (consulting), Norgine (consulting). CB: Boston Scientific (consulting), Recordati (teaching), Norgine (teaching). FZ: Medtronic (research grant), Reckitt Benckiser (consulting).