Therapeutic and prognostic implications of NOTCH and MAPK signaling in bladder cancer.
Aged
Analysis of Variance
Animals
Benzimidazoles
/ therapeutic use
Cell Line, Tumor
Dibenzazepines
/ therapeutic use
Disease Progression
Enzyme Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Mice
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Neoplasm Proteins
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Prognosis
Receptor, Notch1
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Regression Analysis
Signal Transduction
Tissue Array Analysis
/ methods
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
biomarkers
cystectomy
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases receptors
notch
urinary bladder neoplasms
Journal
Cancer science
ISSN: 1349-7006
Titre abrégé: Cancer Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101168776
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
revised:
27
02
2021
received:
29
11
2020
accepted:
07
03
2021
pubmed:
10
3
2021
medline:
11
5
2021
entrez:
9
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Signaling pathways that drive bladder cancer (BC) progression may be promising and specific targets for systemic therapy. Here, we investigated the clinical significance and targetability of NOTCH and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling for this aggressive malignancy. We assessed NOTCH1 and MAPK activity in 222 stage III and IV BC specimens of patients that had undergone radical cystectomy, and tested for clinical associations including cancer-specific and overall survival. We examined therapeutic effects of NOTCH and MAPK repression in a murine xenograft model of human bladder cancer cells and evaluated tumor growth and tumor cell plasticity. In BC, NOTCH1 and MAPK signaling marked two distinct tumor cell subpopulations. The combination of high NOTCH1 and high MAPK activity indicated poor cancer-specific and overall survival in univariate and multivariate analyses. Inhibition of NOTCH and MAPK in BC xenografts in vivo depleted targeted tumor cell subpopulations and revealed strong plasticity in signaling pathway activity. Combinatorial inhibition of NOTCH and MAPK signaling most strongly suppressed tumor growth. Our findings indicate that tumor cell subpopulations with high NOTCH and MAPK activity both contribute to tumor progression. Furthermore, we propose a new concept for BC therapy, which advocates specific and simultaneous targeting of these different tumor cell subpopulations through combined NOTCH and MAPK inhibition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33686706
doi: 10.1111/cas.14878
pmc: PMC8088911
doi:
Substances chimiques
AZD 6244
0
Benzimidazoles
0
Dibenzazepines
0
Enzyme Inhibitors
0
NOTCH1 protein, human
0
Neoplasm Proteins
0
Receptor, Notch1
0
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases
EC 2.7.11.24
dibenzazepine
J411KQJ8C2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1987-1996Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : SCHU 3406/1-1
Organisme : Deutsche Krebshilfe
ID : 111669
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
Références
J Urol. 2008 Jul;180(1):361-6
pubmed: 18499162
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;23(21):6487-6497
pubmed: 28760909
Mol Oncol. 2016 Nov;10(9):1450-1460
pubmed: 27582092
J Clin Invest. 2015 Feb;125(2):824-30
pubmed: 25574842
Int J Oncol. 2009 Jun;34(6):1557-64
pubmed: 19424573
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 25;381(4):338-348
pubmed: 31340094
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 1;30(19):2348-53
pubmed: 22529266
Nat Rev Urol. 2018 Feb;15(2):112-124
pubmed: 29205200
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013 Oct 15;6(11):2430-40
pubmed: 24228105
Eur Urol. 2015 Jul;68(1):3-4
pubmed: 25791514
Ann Oncol. 2016 Jul;27(7):1311-6
pubmed: 27091807
Ann Oncol. 2016 Dec;27(12):2210-2215
pubmed: 27681866
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 8;366(10):883-892
pubmed: 22397650
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38972
pubmed: 22701738
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 15;22(12):2981-92
pubmed: 26769750
Cancer Discov. 2019 Jul;9(7):837-851
pubmed: 30992279
Nat Med. 2016 Jan;22(1):105-13
pubmed: 26618723
Eur Urol. 2017 Jan;71(1):96-108
pubmed: 27370177
Lancet. 2017 Nov 18;390(10109):2266-2277
pubmed: 28916371
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 9;382(15):1430-1442
pubmed: 32187457
Science. 2014 Jun 20;344(6190):1396-401
pubmed: 24925914
Nat Med. 2018 Dec;24(12):1867-1876
pubmed: 30523328
Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 21;8(8):13586-13599
pubmed: 28088793
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 20;36(12):1232-1239
pubmed: 29528792
Nat Rev Urol. 2018 Jun;15(6):345-357
pubmed: 29643502
Nature. 2014 Mar 20;507(7492):315-22
pubmed: 24476821
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug;12(8):445-64
pubmed: 25850553
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;15(2):81-94
pubmed: 29115304
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 25;8(30):48755-48768
pubmed: 28548944
Oncogene. 2012 Mar 22;31(12):1493-503
pubmed: 21822309
Cancer Sci. 2021 May;112(5):1987-1996
pubmed: 33686706
Bladder Cancer. 2018 Jul 30;4(3):327-337
pubmed: 30112444
Nat Genet. 2017 May;49(5):708-718
pubmed: 28319088
Cancer Res. 2010 Jan 15;70(2):832-41
pubmed: 20068172
Oncotarget. 2017 May 23;8(21):34362-34373
pubmed: 28416766
Nat Med. 2014 Oct;20(10):1199-205
pubmed: 25194568
J Exp Med. 2018 Jun 4;215(6):1693-1708
pubmed: 29769248
BMC Cancer. 2014 Aug 29;14:628
pubmed: 25167871
Eur Urol. 2019 Jan;75(1):18-22
pubmed: 30266310
Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 May;11(5):338-51
pubmed: 21508972
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 15;7(1):11702
pubmed: 28916750
Mol Cancer. 2009 Dec 23;8:128
pubmed: 20030805
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Aug 15;22(16):4095-104
pubmed: 27151745
Mol Med Rep. 2015 Aug;12(2):2821-7
pubmed: 25955824
Cell Cycle. 2017 Aug 18;16(16):1509-1514
pubmed: 28745938
Cancer Cell. 2017 Mar 13;31(3):355-367
pubmed: 28238683
Int J Cancer. 2020 Apr 15;146(8):2078-2088
pubmed: 31479514
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50690
pubmed: 23226356
Future Oncol. 2020 Jan;16(2):4359-4368
pubmed: 31823654