Perceptual omission errors in positron emission tomography and computed tomography reporting.
Journal
The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of...
ISSN: 1827-1936
Titre abrégé: Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101213861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
10
3
2021
medline:
21
3
2023
entrez:
9
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Omission errors in medical imaging can lead to missed diagnosis and harm to patients. The subject has been studied in conventional imaging, but no data is available for functional imaging in general and for PET/CT in particular. In this work, we evaluated the frequency and characteristics of perceptual omission errors in the PET component of oncologic PET/CT imaging, and we analyzed the hazardous scenarios prone to such modality-specific errors. Perceptual omission errors were collected in one tertiary center PET/CT clinic during routine PET/CT reporting over a 26-month period. The omissions were detected either in reporting follow-up PET/CT studies of the same patient or during multidisciplinary meetings. Significant omission errors were found in 1.2% of the 2100 reports included in the study. The most common omissions were bone metastases and focal colon uptake. We identified six PET-specific causative factors contributing to the occurrence of omissions, and we propose solutions to minimize their influence. The data presented here can help to promote the awareness of interpreting physicians to body areas that require higher attention and to implement reading strategies for improving the accuracy of PET/CT interpretation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Omission errors in medical imaging can lead to missed diagnosis and harm to patients. The subject has been studied in conventional imaging, but no data is available for functional imaging in general and for PET/CT in particular. In this work, we evaluated the frequency and characteristics of perceptual omission errors in the PET component of oncologic PET/CT imaging, and we analyzed the hazardous scenarios prone to such modality-specific errors.
METHODS
METHODS
Perceptual omission errors were collected in one tertiary center PET/CT clinic during routine PET/CT reporting over a 26-month period. The omissions were detected either in reporting follow-up PET/CT studies of the same patient or during multidisciplinary meetings.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Significant omission errors were found in 1.2% of the 2100 reports included in the study. The most common omissions were bone metastases and focal colon uptake. We identified six PET-specific causative factors contributing to the occurrence of omissions, and we propose solutions to minimize their influence.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The data presented here can help to promote the awareness of interpreting physicians to body areas that require higher attention and to implement reading strategies for improving the accuracy of PET/CT interpretation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33686849
pii: S1824-4785.21.03339-2
doi: 10.23736/S1824-4785.21.03339-2
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
0Z5B2CJX4D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM