Public opinions on seven different stray cat population management scenarios in Flanders, Belgium.

Area of residence Cat population management Feline Managed community cats Overpopulation Public opinion Responsible household cat ownership Socio-demographic factors Stray cats Survey

Journal

Research in veterinary science
ISSN: 1532-2661
Titre abrégé: Res Vet Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401300

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2021
Historique:
received: 28 11 2020
revised: 29 01 2021
accepted: 26 02 2021
pubmed: 11 3 2021
medline: 16 6 2021
entrez: 10 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Stray cat population management is an important worldwide issue. Understanding citizen attitudes towards stray cat control options is vital to the success of controlling stray cat numbers, as public perception affects the acceptance of, support for and collaboration in stray cat management policies. Audience segmentation, as to enable each group to be engaged in the stray cat management policy, is important for the success of the interventions. Therefore a web-based survey was conducted among Flemish citizens in order to examine differences in acceptance towards seven management scenarios: household cat neutering with financial support for the owner, household cat neutering without financial support for the owner, encouraging responsible household cat ownership, trapping stray cats and taking them to a shelter, trapping and neutering stray cats for release into a managed "cat colony" (composed by so called "community cats"), trapping and killing of stray cats, and undertaking no action. A total of 4059 valid responses were collected and the proportions of agreement were compared across the different management scenarios using the two-sample z-test. Interactions among factors that influenced each management scenario were investigated using the CHAID (Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection) analysis and visualized on a tree. Our results showed that fostering responsible household cat ownership (89.9%) and conversion of stray cats to "community cats" (76.3%) were most supported by respondents in our sample (which consisted mainly of females, cat-lovers, and families without children). Least supported were the killing of stray cats (7.7%) and undertaking no action (3.3%). The demographic analyses revealed that for the acceptance of management scenarios there were three important factors (attitude towards cats, area of residence, and gender), two weaker factors (education and having children) and two which had almost no impact (age and cat ownership). We propose that future studies should focus on the effect of 'area of residence', 'having children' and 'education'. In conclusion, our research confirms that management of and communication on stray cat strategies should not be developed with a one-size-fits-all approach. Efforts should be tailored to each audience segment, thus adapted to the area of residence and human characteristics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33689877
pii: S0034-5288(21)00061-8
doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.02.025
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

209-219

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ciska De Ruyver (C)

Department Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Ethology and Animal Welfare Research Group, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Heidestraat 19, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium. Electronic address: ciska.deruyver@ugent.be.

Emmanuel Abatih (E)

Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Sciences and Statistics, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S9, 9000 Gent, Belgium.

Paolo Dalla Villa (PD)

World Organization for Animal Health - OIE Sub-Regional Representation in Brussels, Boulevard du Jardin Botanique 55, 1000 Bruxelles, Belgium.

Els H K A Peeters (EHKA)

Department of Agro- and Biotechnology, SALTO Research Core - Behavioral Biology and Animal Welfare, Faculty of Industrial Sciences and Technology, Odisee University of Applied Sciences, Hospitaalstraat 23, 9100 Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.

Jane Clements (J)

Cats Protection, Lewes Rd, Chelwood Gate, Haywards Heath RH17 7TT, United Kingdom.

Agnes Dufau (A)

FdCATS expertos comprometidos con el bienestar felino, 14001 Cordoba, Spain.

Christel P H Moons (CPH)

Department Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Ethology and Animal Welfare Research Group, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Heidestraat 19, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH