X-Ray-Free Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery for Complex Proximal Ureteral Stone: A Case Report.
ECIRS
modified procedure
supine position
ureterolithiasis
Journal
Research and reports in urology
ISSN: 2253-2447
Titre abrégé: Res Rep Urol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101576971
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
30
12
2020
accepted:
18
02
2021
entrez:
11
3
2021
pubmed:
12
3
2021
medline:
12
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
X-ray-free endoscopic combined intra renal surgery (ECIRS) is a feasible alternative to avoid radiation exposure to both surgical teams and patients, but has not been reported prior. The aim of this report is to present our first-hand experience of performing X-ray-free ECIRS for complex ureteral stone. A 57-year-old female presented with right flank pain, fever, dysuria, and leukocytosis. The computed tomography scan showed right impacted proximal ureteral stone sized 33 ´17 mm and grade IV hydronephrosis. Percutaneous nephrostomy was performed immediately. With improvement of clinical symptoms two days after nephrostomy, X-ray-free ECIRS was performed. The patient was placed in a Galdakao-modified supine position. During ureteroscopy (URS), there was noted right ureteral stenosis in the distal part of the stone, which could be passed. However, the stone was impacted and the semi-rigid URS was not able to push it. Therefore, antegrade approach with percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed. Previous nephrostomy tract was used as percutaneous access. Tract dilatation was performed under direct visualization from the URS. The 28 Fr rigid nephroscope was used during the ECIRS procedure. The stone was fragmented using shock-pulse lithotripters. There was no residual stone or infundibular laceration after the procedure. A 6 Fr double J stent was inserted retrogradely due to ureteral stenosis. There was no complication during and after the procedure. The patient was discharged on post-operative day three. X-ray free ECIRS for complex proximal ureteral stone was possible and showed good results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33692970
doi: 10.2147/RRU.S299707
pii: 299707
pmc: PMC7939507
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
121-125Informations de copyright
© 2021 Birowo et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3 Pt B):E127-31
pubmed: 22757752
Eur Urol. 2008 Dec;54(6):1393-403
pubmed: 18715696
World J Urol. 2013 Dec;31(6):1605-10
pubmed: 23334470
Urol J. 2019 Oct 21;16(5):448-452
pubmed: 30882178
Res Rep Urol. 2020 Jul 23;12:287-293
pubmed: 32802805
World J Urol. 2011 Dec;29(6):821-7
pubmed: 22057344
Urolithiasis. 2018 Feb;46(1):115-123
pubmed: 29189885
BJU Int. 2007 Jul;100(1):233-6
pubmed: 17552975
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2418-34
pubmed: 17993340
Int Urol Nephrol. 2020 Dec;52(12):2253-2259
pubmed: 32710296