Interdisciplinary Research in Artificial Intelligence: Challenges and Opportunities.
artificial intelligence
auditability
education
ethics
interdisciplinary science
interpretability
Journal
Frontiers in big data
ISSN: 2624-909X
Titre abrégé: Front Big Data
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101770603
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
30
06
2020
accepted:
28
10
2020
entrez:
11
3
2021
pubmed:
12
3
2021
medline:
12
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in a variety of research fields is speeding up multiple digital revolutions, from shifting paradigms in healthcare, precision medicine and wearable sensing, to public services and education offered to the masses around the world, to future cities made optimally efficient by autonomous driving. When a revolution happens, the consequences are not obvious straight away, and to date, there is no uniformly adapted framework to guide AI research to ensure a sustainable societal transition. To answer this need, here we analyze three key challenges to interdisciplinary AI research, and deliver three broad conclusions: 1) future development of AI should not only impact other scientific domains but should also take inspiration and benefit from other fields of science, 2) AI research must be accompanied by decision explainability, dataset bias transparency as well as development of evaluation methodologies and creation of regulatory agencies to ensure responsibility, and 3) AI education should receive more attention, efforts and innovation from the educational and scientific communities. Our analysis is of interest not only to AI practitioners but also to other researchers and the general public as it offers ways to guide the emerging collaborations and interactions toward the most fruitful outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33693418
doi: 10.3389/fdata.2020.577974
pii: 577974
pmc: PMC7931862
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
577974Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Kusters, Misevic, Berry, Cully, Cunff, Dandoy, Díaz-Rodríguez, Ficher, Grizou, Othmani, Palpanas, Komorowski, Loiseau, Frier, Nanini, Quercia, Sebag, Fogelman, Taleb, Tupikina, Sahu, Vie and Wehbi.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Authors LT and DQ are employed by the company Nokia Bell Labs. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Sep;22(9):794-809
pubmed: 30097304
Nature. 2016 Oct 05;538(7623):20-23
pubmed: 27708329
Science. 2019 Feb 15;363(6428):692-693
pubmed: 30765552
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019 Jun;18(6):463-477
pubmed: 30976107
Prog Brain Res. 2016;229:257-284
pubmed: 27926442
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44
pubmed: 26017442
Gigascience. 2019 Jun 1;8(6):
pubmed: 31241153
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Feb;114(2):246-257
pubmed: 29389215
Psychol Rev. 1958 Nov;65(6):386-408
pubmed: 13602029
Neuron. 2017 Jul 19;95(2):245-258
pubmed: 28728020
Sci Adv. 2018 Jan 17;4(1):eaao5580
pubmed: 29376122
Science. 2019 Apr 5;364(6435):26-27
pubmed: 30948538
Nature. 2017 Sep 13;549(7671):195-202
pubmed: 28905917
Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7715):547-555
pubmed: 30046072
Front Robot AI. 2020 Feb 18;7:15
pubmed: 33501184
Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 30;10(1):4934
pubmed: 31666525
Sci Adv. 2020 Apr 15;6(16):eaay2631
pubmed: 32426452
Front Neurorobot. 2018 Sep 25;12:59
pubmed: 30319388
Phys Rev Lett. 2020 Jan 10;124(1):010508
pubmed: 31976717