Leaf temperature responses to ABA and dead bacteria in wheat and Arabidopsis.


Journal

Plant signaling & behavior
ISSN: 1559-2324
Titre abrégé: Plant Signal Behav
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291431

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 05 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 12 3 2021
medline: 3 9 2021
entrez: 11 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Stomatal densities, aperture openness and their responsiveness to environmental change determine plant water loss and regulate entry of pathogens. Stomatal responsiveness is usually assessed on restricted areas of leaves or isolated epidermal peels floated in solution. Analyzing these responses in the whole plant context could give valuable additional information, for example on the role of mesophyll in stomatal responses. We analyzed stomatal responses to the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) and pathogenic elicitors in intact plants by dynamic measurement of leaf temperature. We tested whether ABA-induced stomatal closure in wheat requires external nitrate and whether bacterial elicitor-induced stomatal closure can be detected by dynamic thermal imaging in intact Arabidopsis. We found that wheat was hypersensitive to all applied treatments, as even mock-treated leaves showed a strong increase in leaf temperature. Nevertheless, ABA activated stomatal closure in wheat independent of exogenous nitrate. Pathogenic elicitors triggered a fast and transient increase in leaf temperature in intact Arabidopsis, indicating short-term stomatal closure. The data suggest that the dynamics of pathogen-induced stomatal closure is different in whole plants compared to epidermal peels, where elicitor-induced stomatal closure persists longer. We propose that dynamic thermal imaging could be applied to address the effect of pathogenic elicitors on stomatal behavior in whole plants to complement detached sample assays and gain a better understanding of stomatal immunity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33704000
doi: 10.1080/15592324.2021.1899471
pmc: PMC8078522
doi:

Substances chimiques

Abscisic Acid 72S9A8J5GW

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1899471

Références

Plant Cell. 2014 Jul;26(7):3167-84
pubmed: 25005917
Plant Cell Environ. 2021 Mar;44(3):885-899
pubmed: 33295045
Elife. 2019 Sep 16;8:
pubmed: 31524595
New Phytol. 2014 Apr;202(2):499-508
pubmed: 24392838
Sci Signal. 2018 Feb 20;11(518):
pubmed: 29463779
Plant Physiol. 2006 Jan;140(1):127-39
pubmed: 16361522
Plant Cell Physiol. 2014 Oct;55(10):1691-703
pubmed: 25063782
Genes Dev. 2006 Mar 1;20(5):537-42
pubmed: 16510871
Curr Biol. 2018 May 7;28(9):1370-1379.e5
pubmed: 29706511
Plant Cell Environ. 2019 Aug;42(8):2411-2421
pubmed: 31042812
Plant Physiol. 2013 Jul;162(3):1652-68
pubmed: 23703845
Cell. 2006 Sep 8;126(5):969-80
pubmed: 16959575

Auteurs

Hanna Hõrak (H)

Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.

Luke Fountain (L)

Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Jessica A Dunn (JA)

Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Joanna Landymore (J)

Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Julie E Gray (JE)

Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Articles similaires

Genome, Viral Ralstonia Composting Solanum lycopersicum Bacteriophages
Semiconductors Photosynthesis Polymers Carbon Dioxide Bacteria
Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Proteins Osmotic Pressure Cytoplasm RNA, Messenger
Fragaria Light Plant Leaves Osmosis Stress, Physiological

Classifications MeSH