Genomic characterization of selfing in the cyclic parthenogen Daphnia magna.
SNPs
homozygosity
inbreeding depression
recombination rate
stochasticity
Journal
Journal of evolutionary biology
ISSN: 1420-9101
Titre abrégé: J Evol Biol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 8809954
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
revised:
23
02
2021
received:
06
12
2020
accepted:
06
03
2021
pubmed:
12
3
2021
medline:
2
9
2021
entrez:
11
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Inbreeding refers to the fusion of related individuals' gametes, with self-fertilization (selfing) being an extreme form of inbreeding-involving gametes produced by the same individual. Selfing is expected to reduce heterozygosity by an average of 50% in one generation; however, little is known about the empirical variation on a genome level surrounding this figure and the factors that affect variation. We selfed genotypes of the cyclic parthenogen Daphnia magna and analysed whole genomes of mothers and selfed offspring, observing the predicted 50% heterozygosity reduction on average. We also saw substantial variation around this value and significant differences among mother-offspring pairs. Crossover analysis confirmed the known trend of recombination occurring more often towards the telomeres. This effect was shown, through simulations, to increase the variance of heterozygosity reduction compared to when a uniform distribution of crossovers was used. Similarly, we simulated inbred line production after several generations of selfing and we observed higher variance in achieved homozygosity when we consider a higher recombination rate towards the telomeres. Our empirical and simulation study highlights that the expected mean values of heterozygosity reduction show remarkable variation, which can help understand, for example, differences among inbred individuals.
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.x3ffbg7j6']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
792-802Informations de copyright
© 2021 European Society for Evolutionary Biology.
Références
Abe, J., & Pannebakker, B. A. (2017). Development of microsatellite markers and estimation of inbreeding frequency in the parasitoid wasp Melittobia. Scientific Reports, 7, 39879. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39879
Altermatt, F., & Ebert, D. (2010). Populations in small, ephemeral habitat patches may drive dynamics in a Daphnia magna metapopulation. Ecology, 91, 2975-2982.
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M., & Usadel, B. (2014). Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics, 30, 2114-2120. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
Broman, K. W. (2005). The genomes of recombinant inbred lines. Genetics, 169, 1133-1146. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.035212
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 261-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644
Burt, A., & Bell, G. (1987). Mammalian chiasma frequencies as a test of two theories of recombination. Nature, 326, 803-805. https://doi.org/10.1038/326803a0
Chapman, J. R., Nakagawa, S., Coltman, D. W., Slate, J., & Sheldon, B. C. (2009). A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations. Molecular Ecology, 18, 2746-2765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04247.x
Charlesworth, D., & Charlesworth, B. (1987). Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18, 237-268. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.001321
Charlesworth, D., & Willis, J. H. (2009). The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10, 783-796. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2664
Chen, J. M., Cooper, D. N., Chuzhanova, N., Férec, C., & Patrinos, G. P. (2007). Gene conversion: Mechanisms, evolution and human disease. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8, 762-775.
Chin, C.-S., Peluso, P., Sedlazeck, F. J., Nattestad, M., Concepcion, G. T., Clum, A., Dunn, C., O'Malley, R., Figueroa-Balderas, R., Morales-Cruz, A., Cramer, G. R., Delledonne, M., Luo, C., Ecker, J. R., Cantu, D., Rank, D. R., & Schatz, M. C. (2016). Phased diploid genome assembly with single-molecule real-time sequencing. Nature Methods, 13, 1050-1054. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4035
Crnokrak, P., & Barrett, S. C. H. (2002). Perspective: Purging the genetic load: A review of the experimental evidence. Evolution, 56, 2347-2358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00160.x
Danecek, P., Auton, A., Abecasis, G., Albers, C. A., Banks, E., DePristo, M. A., Handsaker, R. E., Lunter, G., Marth, G. T., Sherry, S. T., McVean, G., & Durbin, R. (2011). The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics, 27, 2156-2158. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330
De Meester, L. (1993). Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in Daphnia. Oecologia, 96, 80-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318033
Druet, T., & Farnir, F. P. (2011). Modeling of identity-by-descent processes along a chromosome between haplotypes and their genotyped ancestors. Genetics, 188, 409-419. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.127720
Dukić, M., Berner, D., Roesti, M., Haag, C. R., & Ebert, D. (2016). A high-density genetic map reveals variation in recombination rate across the genome of Daphnia magna. BMC Genetics, 17, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-016-0445-7
Eslami Rasekh, M., Chiatante, G., Miroballo, M., Tang, J., Ventura, M., Amemiya, C. T., Eichler, E. E., Antonacci, F., & Alkan, C. (2017). Discovery of large genomic inversions using long range information. BMC Genomics, 18(1), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3444-1
Fields, P. D., Obbard, D. J., Mctaggart, S. J., Galimov, Y., Tom, J., & Ebert, D. (2018). Mitogenome phylogeographic analysis of a planktonic crustacean. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 129, 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2018.06.028
Franklin, I. R. (1977). The distribution of the proportion of the genome which is homozygous by descent in inbred individuals. Theoretical Population Biology, 11, 60-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(77)90007-7
Haag, C. R., Hotinger, J. W., Riex, M., & Ebert, D. (2002). Strong inbreeding depression in a Daphnia metapopulation. Evolution, 56, 518-526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01363.x
Haag, C. R., Sakwinska, O., & Ebert, D. (2003). Test of synergistic interaction between infection and inbreeding in Daphnia magna. Evolution, 57, 777-783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00289.x
Haag-Liautard, C., Dorris, M., Maside, X., Macaskill, S., Halligan, D. L., Charlesworth, B., & Keightley, P. D. (2007). Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila. Nature, 445, 82-85. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05388
Haenel, Q., Laurentino, T. G., Roesti, M., & Berner, D. (2018). Meta-analysis of chromosome-scale crossover rate variation in eukaryotes and its significance to evolutionary genomics. Molecular Ecology, 27, 2477-2497. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14699
Hartfield, M., Bataillon, T., & Glémin, S. (2017). The evolutionary interplay between adaptation and self-fertilization. Trends in Genetics, 33(6), 420-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2017.04.002
Hartl, D. L., & Clark, A. G. (1997). Principles of population genetics, 3rd ed. Sinauer Associates.
Hedrick, P. W., & Garcia-Dorado, A. (2016). Understanding inbreeding depression, purging, and genetic rescue. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(12), 940-952.
Hill, W. G., & Weir, B. S. (2011). Variation in actual relationship as a consequence of Mendelian sampling and linkage. Genetical Research, 93, 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672310000480
Ho, A. E. K. H., Macrae, F., Iv, L. C. L., Mcilroy, P., Fields, P. D., Benner, M. J., Schaack, S. (2020). High and highly variable spontaneous mutation rates in Daphnia. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 37, 3258-3266.
Hodgkinson, A., & Eyre-Walker, A. (2011). Variation in the mutation rate across mammalian genomes. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12, 756-766. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3098
Huang, M. H., & Caillaud, M. C. (2012). Inbreeding avoidance by recognition of close kin in the Pea Aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Journal of Insect Science, 12, 39.
Jagut, M., Hamminger, P., Woglar, A., Millonigg, S., Paulin, L., Mikl, M., Dello Stritto, M. R., Tang, L., Habacher, C., Tam, A., Gallach, M., von Haeseler, A., Villeneuve, A. M., & Jantsch, V. (2016). Separable roles for a Caenorhabditis elegans RMI1 homolog in promoting and antagonizing meiotic crossovers ensure faithful chromosome inheritance. PLoS Biology, 14, e1002412. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002412
Jarne, P., & Auld, J. R. (2006). Animals mix it up too: The distribution of self-fertilization among hermaphroditic animals. Evolution, 60, 1816-1824. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00525.x
Jarne, P., Perdieu, M. A., Pernot, A. F., Delay, B., & David, P. (2000). The influence of self-fertilization and grouping on fitness attributes in the freshwater snail Physa acuta: Population and individual inbreeding depression. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 13, 645-655. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00204.x
Jensen-Seaman, M. I., Furey, T. S., Payseur, B. A., Lu, Y., Roskin, K. M., Chen, C. et al (2004). Comparative recombination rates in the rat, mouse, and human genomes. Genome Research, 14, 528-538.
Kardos, M., Åkesson, M., Fountain, T., Flagstad, Ø., Liberg, O., Olason, P., Sand, H., Wabakken, P., Wikenros, C., & Ellegren, H. (2018). Genomic consequences of intensive inbreeding in an isolated Wolf population. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2, 124-131. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0375-4
Kardos, M., Luikart, G., & Allendorf, F. W. (2015). Measuring individual inbreeding in the age of genomics: Marker-based measures are better than pedigrees. Heredity, 115, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2015.17
Kleiven, O. T., Larsson, P., Hobaek, A., & Hobaek, A. (1992). Sexual reproduction in Daphnia magna requires three stimuli. Oikos, 65, 197-206. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545010
Knief, U., Kempenaers, B., & Forstmeier, W. (2017). Meiotic recombination shapes precision of pedigree- and marker-based estimates of inbreeding. Heredity, 118, 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2016.95
Korneliussen, T. S., Albrechtsen, A., & Nielsen, R. (2014). ANGSD: Analysis of next generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics, 15, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-014-0356-4
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2010). Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics, 26, 589-595. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., & Durbin, R. (2009). The Sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 25, 2078-2079. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Li, H., & Wren, J. (2014). Toward better understanding of artifacts in variant calling from high-coverage samples. Bioinformatics, 30, 2843-2851. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu356
McKenna, A., Hanna, M., Banks, E., Sivachenko, A., Cibulskis, K., Kernytsky, A., Garimella, K., Altshuler, D., Gabriel, S., Daly, M., & DePristo, M. A. (2010). The genome analysis toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Research, 20, 1297-1303. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.107524.110
Mergeay, J., Vanoverbeke, J., Verschuren, D., & De Meester, L. (2007). Extinction, recolonization, and dispersal through time in a planktonic crustacean. Ecology, 88, 3032-3043.
Mitchell, R. J., Flanagan, R. J., Brown, B. J., Waser, N. M., & Karron, J. D. (2009). New frontiers in competition for pollination. Annals of Botany, 103, 1403-1413. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp062
Morgulis, A., Gertz, E. M., Schäffer, A. A., & Agarwala, R. (2006). A fast and symmetric DUST implementation to mask low-complexity DNA sequences. Journal of Computational Biology, 13, 1028-1040. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2006.13.1028
Mushegian, A. A., Burcklen, E., Schär, T. M. M., & Ebert, D. (2016). Temperature-dependent benefits of bacterial exposure in embryonic development of Daphnia magna resting eggs. Journal of Experimental Biology, 219, 897-904.
Noël, E., Jarne, P., Glémin, S., MacKenzie, A., Segard, A., Sarda, V., & David, P. (2017). Experimental evidence for the negative effects of self-fertilization on the adaptive potential of populations. Current Biology, 27, 237-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.015
O’Leary, S. J., Puritz, J. B., Willis, S. C., Hollenbeck, C. M., & Portnoy, D. S. (2018). These aren’t the loci you’e looking for: Principles of effective SNP filtering for molecular ecologists. Molecular Ecology, 27, 3193-3206. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14792
R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, .
Ritz, K. R., Noor, M. A. F., & Singh, N. D. (2017). Variation in recombination rate: Adaptive or not? Trends in Genetics, 33, 364-374.
Routtu, J., Jansen, B., Colson, I., De Meester, L., & Ebert, D. (2010). The first-generation Daphnia magna linkage map. BMC Genomics, 11, 508.
Salathé, P., & Ebert, D. (2003). The effects of parasitism and inbreeding on the competitive ability in Daphnia magna: Evidence for synergistic epistasis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 976-985.
Sardell, J. M., & Kirkpatrick, M. (2019). Sex differences in the recombination landscape. American Naturalist, 195, 361-379.
Schemske, D. W., & Lande, R. (1985). The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations. Evolution, 39, 41-52.
Sicard, A., & Lenhard, M. (2011). The selfing syndrome: A model for studying the genetic and evolutionary basis of morphological adaptation in plants. Annals of Botany, 107, 1433-1443.
Stam, P. (1980). The distribution of the fraction of the genome identical by descent in finite random mating populations. Genetical Research, 35, 131-155.
Stam, P. (1993). Construction of integrated genetic linkage maps by means of a new computer package: JOINMAP. The Plant Journal, 3, 739-744.
Stapley, J., Feulner, P. G. D., Johnston, S. E., Santure, A. W., & Smadja, C. M. (2017). Variation in recombination frequency and distribution across eukaryotes: Patterns and processes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372, 20160455.
Strauss, S. H. (1986). Heterosis at allozyme loci under inbreeding and crossbreeding in Pinus attenuata. Genetics, 113, 115-134.
Svendsen, N., Reisser, C. M. O., Dukić, M., Thuillier, V., Ségard, A., Liautard-Haag, C. et al (2015). Uncovering cryptic asexuality in Daphnia magna by RAD sequencing. Genetics, 201, 1143-1155.
Treangen, T. J., & Salzberg, S. L. (2012). Repetitive DNA and next-generation sequencing: Computational challenges and solutions. Nature Reviews Genetics, 13, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3117
Tucker, A. E., Ackerman, M. S., Eads, B. D., Xu, S., & Lynch, M. (2013). Population-genomic insights into the evolutionary origin and fate of obligately asexual Daphnia pulex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 15740-15745. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1313388110
Van Ooijen, J. W. (2006). JoinMap 4.0: Software for the calculation of geneticlinkage maps in experimental populations. Kyazma, B.V., .
Vieira, F. G., Fumagalli, M., Albrechtsen, A., & Nielsen, R. (2013). Estimating inbreeding coefficients from NGS data: Impact on genotype calling and allele frequency estimation. Genome Research, 23, 1852-1861. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.157388.113
White, I. M. S., & Hill, W. G. (2020). Effect of heterogeneity in recombination rate on variation in realised relationship. Heredity, 124, 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-019-0241-z