Dried blood spots for the quantitative evaluation of IgG isotypes and correlation with serum samples in HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) infants.
Dried Blood Spot
IgG subclasses
Infants
Journal
Journal of immunological methods
ISSN: 1872-7905
Titre abrégé: J Immunol Methods
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 1305440
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
received:
07
09
2020
revised:
24
02
2021
accepted:
04
03
2021
pubmed:
12
3
2021
medline:
29
9
2021
entrez:
11
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The determination of IgG levels and their subclasses can provide clinically relevant information on the status of the immune system. Here we determined the sensitivity and reproducibility of the quantification of IgG subclasses from Dried Blood Spots (DBS) in Malawian uninfected infants exposed to HIV (HEU). Sixty paired samples of serum and DBS from HEU infants were used. Samples were collected from 1, 6, and 24-month old infants. IgGs concentrations from both serum and DBS were analyzed by BN ProSpec Siemens assay, using a different setting for sample dilutions. The reproducibility of the DBS method was tested on 10 samples run twice, starting from the DBS extraction process. To assess the systematic, proportional, and random differences, we computed the Passing-Bablok regression, and the Bland-Altman analysis to estimate the total mean bias between the two tests. The IgG isotypes concentrations from serum and DBS showed significant differences in all the comparisons. Generally, the DBS method underestimated IgG subclasses' values showing a recovery range between 51.2% and 77.6%. Passing Bablok regression on age-based groups showed agreement for IgG, IgG1, and IgG2, but not for IgG3 and IgG4. The mean bias obtained with the Bland Altman test varied largely depending on IgG isotypes (-0.02-2.21 g/l) Coefficient of variation <7.0% was found in the repeated tests for IgG, IgG1, IgG3, and IgG4, while it was 12.4% for IgG2. Varying degrees of differences were seen in the IgGs measurement in the two different matrices. In IgGs analysis, the DBS method offers promise for population-based research, but the results should be carefully evaluated and considered as a relative value since they are not equivalent to the serum concentrations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The determination of IgG levels and their subclasses can provide clinically relevant information on the status of the immune system. Here we determined the sensitivity and reproducibility of the quantification of IgG subclasses from Dried Blood Spots (DBS) in Malawian uninfected infants exposed to HIV (HEU).
METHODS
Sixty paired samples of serum and DBS from HEU infants were used. Samples were collected from 1, 6, and 24-month old infants. IgGs concentrations from both serum and DBS were analyzed by BN ProSpec Siemens assay, using a different setting for sample dilutions. The reproducibility of the DBS method was tested on 10 samples run twice, starting from the DBS extraction process. To assess the systematic, proportional, and random differences, we computed the Passing-Bablok regression, and the Bland-Altman analysis to estimate the total mean bias between the two tests.
RESULTS
The IgG isotypes concentrations from serum and DBS showed significant differences in all the comparisons. Generally, the DBS method underestimated IgG subclasses' values showing a recovery range between 51.2% and 77.6%. Passing Bablok regression on age-based groups showed agreement for IgG, IgG1, and IgG2, but not for IgG3 and IgG4. The mean bias obtained with the Bland Altman test varied largely depending on IgG isotypes (-0.02-2.21 g/l) Coefficient of variation <7.0% was found in the repeated tests for IgG, IgG1, IgG3, and IgG4, while it was 12.4% for IgG2.
CONCLUSIONS
Varying degrees of differences were seen in the IgGs measurement in the two different matrices. In IgGs analysis, the DBS method offers promise for population-based research, but the results should be carefully evaluated and considered as a relative value since they are not equivalent to the serum concentrations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33705735
pii: S0022-1759(21)00064-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2021.113019
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immunoglobulin Isotypes
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
113019Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.