Prediction of meat quality traits in the abattoir using portable near-infrared spectrometers: heritability of predicted traits and genetic correlations with laboratory-measured traits.
Genetic parameters
Meat quality
Near-infrared spectroscopy
Piemontese
Journal
Journal of animal science and biotechnology
ISSN: 1674-9782
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci Biotechnol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101581293
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Mar 2021
12 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
08
08
2020
accepted:
12
01
2021
entrez:
12
3
2021
pubmed:
13
3
2021
medline:
13
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The possibility of assessing meat quality traits over the meat chain is strongly limited, especially in the context of selective breeding which requires a large number of phenotypes. The main objective of this study was to investigate the suitability of portable infrared spectrometers for phenotyping beef cattle aiming to genetically improving the quality of their meat. Meat quality traits (pH, color, water holding capacity, tenderness) were appraised on rib eye muscle samples of 1,327 Piemontese young bulls using traditional (i.e., reference/gold standard) laboratory analyses; the same traits were also predicted from spectra acquired at the abattoir on the intact muscle surface of the same animals 1 d after slaughtering. Genetic parameters were estimated for both laboratory measures of meat quality traits and their spectra-based predictions. The prediction performances of the calibration equations, assessed through external validation, were satisfactory for color traits (R Results showed that NIRS predictions of color traits, pH, and purge losses could be used as indicator traits for the indirect genetic selection of the reference quality phenotypes. Results for cooking losses were less effective, while the NIR predictions of tenderness were affected by a relatively high uncertainty of estimate. Overall, genetic selection of some meat quality traits, whose direct phenotyping is difficult, can benefit of the application of infrared spectrometers technology.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The possibility of assessing meat quality traits over the meat chain is strongly limited, especially in the context of selective breeding which requires a large number of phenotypes. The main objective of this study was to investigate the suitability of portable infrared spectrometers for phenotyping beef cattle aiming to genetically improving the quality of their meat. Meat quality traits (pH, color, water holding capacity, tenderness) were appraised on rib eye muscle samples of 1,327 Piemontese young bulls using traditional (i.e., reference/gold standard) laboratory analyses; the same traits were also predicted from spectra acquired at the abattoir on the intact muscle surface of the same animals 1 d after slaughtering. Genetic parameters were estimated for both laboratory measures of meat quality traits and their spectra-based predictions.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The prediction performances of the calibration equations, assessed through external validation, were satisfactory for color traits (R
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Results showed that NIRS predictions of color traits, pH, and purge losses could be used as indicator traits for the indirect genetic selection of the reference quality phenotypes. Results for cooking losses were less effective, while the NIR predictions of tenderness were affected by a relatively high uncertainty of estimate. Overall, genetic selection of some meat quality traits, whose direct phenotyping is difficult, can benefit of the application of infrared spectrometers technology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33706809
doi: 10.1186/s40104-021-00555-5
pii: 10.1186/s40104-021-00555-5
pmc: PMC7953783
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
29Subventions
Organisme : Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Cuneo (IT)
ID : 2014/0249
Références
Meat Sci. 2003 Apr;63(4):515-23
pubmed: 22062522
Meat Sci. 2003 Apr;63(4):441-50
pubmed: 22062513
Animal. 2010 Nov;4(11):1832-43
pubmed: 22445144
Meat Sci. 2019 Jul;153:75-85
pubmed: 30913411
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Nov;101(11):9621-9622
pubmed: 30342695
Meat Sci. 2004 Jan;66(1):45-54
pubmed: 22063930
Meat Sci. 2020 Mar;161:108017
pubmed: 31884162
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jul;98(7):4914-27
pubmed: 25958274
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Nov;98(11):8133-51
pubmed: 26387015
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Apr;94(4):1657-67
pubmed: 21426953
Appl Spectrosc. 2017 Jul;71(7):1403-1426
pubmed: 28534672
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Dec;97(12):7940-51
pubmed: 25306267
Genetics. 2014 Oct;198(2):483-95
pubmed: 25009151
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Nov;94(11):5683-90
pubmed: 22032392
Meat Sci. 2019 Oct;156:111-117
pubmed: 31153044
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Oct;92(10):5304-13
pubmed: 19762848
J Anim Sci. 2011 Sep;89(9):2687-95
pubmed: 21454870
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Oct;97(10):6560-72
pubmed: 25108864
Meat Sci. 2011 Sep;89(1):84-90
pubmed: 21546169
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Feb;102(2):1354-1363
pubmed: 30580946
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jul;100(7):5526-5540
pubmed: 28478002
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Sep;96(9):5991-6006
pubmed: 23810593
Meat Sci. 2009 Sep;83(1):96-103
pubmed: 20416617
Animal. 2020 Feb;14(2):243-252
pubmed: 31414654
J Anim Sci. 2003 Jan;81(1):54-60
pubmed: 12597372