Burrow emergence rhythms of Nephrops norvegicus by UWTV and surveying biases.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 03 2021
Historique:
received: 29 10 2020
accepted: 24 02 2021
entrez: 12 3 2021
pubmed: 13 3 2021
medline: 13 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Underwater Television (UWTV) surveys provide fishery-independent stock size estimations of the Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus), based directly on burrow counting using the survey assumption of "one animal = one burrow". However, stock size may be uncertain depending on true rates of burrow occupation. For the first time, 3055 video transects carried out in several Functional Units (FUs) around Ireland were used to investigate this uncertainty. This paper deals with the discrimination of burrow emergence and door-keeping diel behaviour in Nephrops norvegicus, which is one of the most commercially important fisheries in Europe. Comparisons of burrow densities with densities of visible animals engaged in door-keeping (i.e. animals waiting at the tunnel entrance) behaviour and animals in full emergence, were analysed at time windows of expected maximum population emergence. Timing of maximum emergence was determined using wave-form analysis and GAM modelling. The results showed an average level of 1 visible Nephrops individual per 10 burrow systems, depending on sampling time and depth. This calls into question the current burrow occupancy assumption which may not hold true in all FUs. This is discussed in relation to limitations of sampling methodologies and new autonomous robotic technological solutions for monitoring.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33707595
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85240-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-85240-3
pmc: PMC7970996
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5797

Références

PLoS One. 2018 Jan 22;13(1):e0191662
pubmed: 29357381
J Exp Biol. 2017 Dec 15;220(Pt 24):4624-4633
pubmed: 29051227
Adv Mar Biol. 2013;64:247-314
pubmed: 23668592
J Biol Rhythms. 2010 Aug;25(4):277-87
pubmed: 20679497
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jun 18;53(12):6616-6631
pubmed: 31074981
Adv Mar Biol. 2013;64:201-45
pubmed: 23668591
Adv Mar Biol. 2010;58:155-225
pubmed: 20959158
Sci Robot. 2020 Nov 25;5(48):
pubmed: 33239320
Adv Mar Biol. 2013;64:65-106
pubmed: 23668588

Auteurs

Jacopo Aguzzi (J)

Instituto de Ciencias del Mar (ICM-CSIC), 08003, Barcelona, Spain. jaguzzi@icm.csic.es.
Stazione Zoologica of Naples (SZN), 80122, Naples, Italy. jaguzzi@icm.csic.es.

Nixon Bahamon (N)

Instituto de Ciencias del Mar (ICM-CSIC), 08003, Barcelona, Spain.

Jennifer Doyle (J)

Marine Institute (MI), Oranmore, Galway, H91 R673, Ireland.

Colm Lordan (C)

Marine Institute (MI), Oranmore, Galway, H91 R673, Ireland.

Ian D Tuck (ID)

National Institute of Water and Atmosphere (NIWA), Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.

Matteo Chiarini (M)

Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnologies, National Research Council (CNR IRBIM), 60125, Ancona, Italy.

Michela Martinelli (M)

Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnologies, National Research Council (CNR IRBIM), 60125, Ancona, Italy.

Joan B Company (JB)

Instituto de Ciencias del Mar (ICM-CSIC), 08003, Barcelona, Spain.

Classifications MeSH