Use of biplane quantitative angiographic imaging with ensemble neural networks to assess reperfusion status during mechanical thrombectomy.
Ensemble network
acute ischemic stroke
angiographic parametric imaging
large vessel occlusion
machine learning
mechanical thrombectomy
thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI)
Journal
Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
ISSN: 0277-786X
Titre abrégé: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101524122
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
entrez:
12
3
2021
pubmed:
13
3
2021
medline:
13
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the main imaging modality used to assess reperfusion during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) when treating large vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic strokes. To improve this visual and subjective assessment, hybrid models combining angiographic parametric imaging (API) with deep learning tools have been proposed. These models use convolutional neural networks (CNN) with single view individual API maps, thus restricting use of complementary information from multiple views and maps resulting in loss of relevant clinical information. This study investigates use of ensemble networks to combine hemodynamic information from multiple bi-plane API maps to assess level of reperfusion. Three-hundred-eighty-three anteroposterior (AP) and lateral view DSAs were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent MTs of anterior circulation LVOs. API peak height (PH) and area under time density curve (AUC) maps were generated. CNNs were developed to classify maps as adequate/inadequate reperfusion as labeled by two neuro-interventionalists. Outputs from individual networks were combined by weighting each output, using a grid search algorithm. Ensembled, AP-AUC, AP-PH, lateral-AUC, and lateral-PH networks achieved accuracies of 83.0% (95% confidence-interval: 81.2%-84.8%), 74.4% (72.0%-76.7%), 74.2% (72.8%-75.7%), 74.9% (72.2%-77.7%), and 76.9% (74.4%-79.5%); area under receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.86 (0.84-0.88), 0.81 (0.79-0.83), 0.83 (0.81-0.84), 0.82 (0.8-0.84), and 0.84 (0.82-0.87); and Matthews correlation coefficients of 0.66 (0.63-0.70), 0.48 (0.43-0.53), 0.49 (0.46-0.52), 0.51 (0.45-0.56), and 0.54 (0.49-0.59) respectively. Ensembled network performance was significantly better than individual networks (McNemar's p-value<0.05). This study proved feasibility of using ensemble networks to combine hemodynamic information from multiple bi-plane API maps to assess level of reperfusion during MTs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33707812
doi: 10.1117/12.2580358
pmc: PMC7946164
mid: NIHMS1671853
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : KL2 TR001413
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB030092
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R21 NS109575
Pays : United States
Références
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2014 Mar 13;9038:90380L
pubmed: 25302010
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020 Jan;7(1):016001
pubmed: 32064301
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37
pubmed: 12869717
BMC Genomics. 2020 Jan 2;21(1):6
pubmed: 31898477
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2016 Feb 27;9788:
pubmed: 28649163
Neurosurgery. 2019 Jul 1;85(suppl_1):S4-S8
pubmed: 31197329
Stroke. 2019 Nov;50(11):3277-3279
pubmed: 31500555
Interv Neuroradiol. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):21-7
pubmed: 24556296
Stroke. 2013 Sep;44(9):2650-63
pubmed: 23920012
Neuroradiology. 2021 Jan 7;:
pubmed: 33415348
Pract Neurol. 2017 Aug;17(4):252-265
pubmed: 28647705
Mo Med. 2016 Nov-Dec;113(6):480-486
pubmed: 30228538
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Feb;29(2):104504
pubmed: 31761735
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 May;33(5):975-6
pubmed: 22241379
Neurosurg Focus. 2014 Jan;36(1):E5
pubmed: 24380482
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Oct 20;405(2):442-51
pubmed: 1180967
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Mar;12(3):260-265
pubmed: 31444289
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272
pubmed: 32015543
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Apr;12(4):417-421
pubmed: 31444288
Radiology. 2020 Mar;294(3):487-489
pubmed: 31891322
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017 Mar;140:93-110
pubmed: 28254094
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Jul;12(7):714-719
pubmed: 31822594