Prescriber perspectives on low-value prescribing: A qualitative study.


Journal

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
ISSN: 1532-5415
Titre abrégé: J Am Geriatr Soc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7503062

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2021
Historique:
revised: 12 02 2021
received: 15 11 2020
accepted: 16 02 2021
pubmed: 13 3 2021
medline: 7 10 2021
entrez: 12 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Health systems are increasingly implementing interventions to reduce older patients' use of low-value medications. However, prescribers' perspectives on medication value and the acceptability of interventions to reduce low-value prescribing are poorly understood. To identify the characteristics that affect the value of a medication and those factors influencing low-value prescribing from the perspective of primary care physicians. Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Academic and community primary care practices within University of Pittsburgh Medical Center health system. Sixteen primary care physicians. We elicited 16 prescribers' perspectives on definitions and examples of low-value prescribing in older adults, the factors that incentivize them to engage in such prescribing, and the characteristics of interventions that would make them less likely to engage in low-value prescribing. We identified three key themes. First, prescribers viewed low-value prescribing among older adults as common, characterized both by features of the medications themselves and of the particular patients to whom they were prescribed. Second, prescribers described the causes of low-value prescribing as multifactorial, with factors related to patients, prescribers, and the health system as a whole, making low-value prescribing a default practice pattern. Third, interventions addressing low-value prescribing must minimize the cognitive load and time pressures that make low-value prescribing common. Interventions increasing time pressure or cognitive load, such as increased documentation, were considered less acceptable. Our findings demonstrate that low-value prescribing is a well-recognized phenomenon, and that interventions to reduce low-value prescribing must consider physicians' perspectives and address the specific patient, prescriber and health system factors that make low-value prescribing a default practice.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Health systems are increasingly implementing interventions to reduce older patients' use of low-value medications. However, prescribers' perspectives on medication value and the acceptability of interventions to reduce low-value prescribing are poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE
To identify the characteristics that affect the value of a medication and those factors influencing low-value prescribing from the perspective of primary care physicians.
DESIGN
Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.
SETTING
Academic and community primary care practices within University of Pittsburgh Medical Center health system.
PARTICIPANTS
Sixteen primary care physicians.
MEASUREMENTS
We elicited 16 prescribers' perspectives on definitions and examples of low-value prescribing in older adults, the factors that incentivize them to engage in such prescribing, and the characteristics of interventions that would make them less likely to engage in low-value prescribing.
RESULTS
We identified three key themes. First, prescribers viewed low-value prescribing among older adults as common, characterized both by features of the medications themselves and of the particular patients to whom they were prescribed. Second, prescribers described the causes of low-value prescribing as multifactorial, with factors related to patients, prescribers, and the health system as a whole, making low-value prescribing a default practice pattern. Third, interventions addressing low-value prescribing must minimize the cognitive load and time pressures that make low-value prescribing common. Interventions increasing time pressure or cognitive load, such as increased documentation, were considered less acceptable.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings demonstrate that low-value prescribing is a well-recognized phenomenon, and that interventions to reduce low-value prescribing must consider physicians' perspectives and address the specific patient, prescriber and health system factors that make low-value prescribing a default practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33710629
doi: 10.1111/jgs.17099
pmc: PMC8192466
mid: NIHMS1689355
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1500-1507

Subventions

Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K23 AG061217
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K23AG061217
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The American Geriatrics Society.

Références

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jun;67(6):1204-1210
pubmed: 30756387
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Oct;67(10):2018-2022
pubmed: 31430394
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52552
pubmed: 23300706
BMJ. 2018 Nov 14;363:k4524
pubmed: 30429122
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014 Jan;13(1):57-65
pubmed: 24073682
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Jun 10;9:301
pubmed: 27286651
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 08;4(12):e006544
pubmed: 25488097
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Dec;80(6):1254-68
pubmed: 27006985
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):746-753
pubmed: 32067226
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jul 09;13:56
pubmed: 22697490
Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Sep 03;7(3):
pubmed: 31484305
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 May;53(5):885-90
pubmed: 15877570
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Jul;15(4):341-346
pubmed: 28694270
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2017 Jan;24(1):37-42
pubmed: 31156896
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Aug;36(8):957-971
pubmed: 29736895
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Sep 20;73(7):e98-e107
pubmed: 29190369
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 21;18(1):148
pubmed: 30463515
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2017 Apr;44:69-73
pubmed: 27940405
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2018 Aug;43(4):550-555
pubmed: 29682764

Auteurs

Eric L Walter (EL)

Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Alicia Dawdani (A)

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Alison Decker (A)

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Megan E Hamm (ME)

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Aimee N Pickering (AN)

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Joseph T Hanlon (JT)

Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Center for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing, Health Policy Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Carolyn T Thorpe (CT)

Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Mark S Roberts (MS)

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Michael J Fine (MJ)

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Walid F Gellad (WF)

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Center for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing, Health Policy Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Thomas R Radomski (TR)

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Center for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing, Health Policy Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH