Migration distance and maternal resource allocation determine timing of birth in a large herbivore.
Odocoileus hemionus
birth timing
capital-income breeding spectrum
carry-over effects
full annual cycle ecology
green-wave surfing
migration
mule deer
seasonal interactions
Journal
Ecology
ISSN: 1939-9170
Titre abrégé: Ecology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0043541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
revised:
21
12
2020
received:
25
06
2020
accepted:
14
01
2021
pubmed:
13
3
2021
medline:
29
6
2021
entrez:
12
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Birth timing is a key life-history characteristic that influences fitness and population performance. For migratory animals, however, appropriately timing birth on one seasonal range may be constrained by events occurring during other parts of the migratory cycle. We investigated how the use of capital and income resources may facilitate flexibility in reproductive phenology of migratory mule deer in western Wyoming, USA, over a 5-yr period (2015-2019). Specifically, we examined how seasonal interactions affected three interrelated life-history characteristics: fetal development, birth mass, and birth timing. Females in good nutritional condition at the onset of winter and those that migrated short distances had more developed fetuses (measured as fetal eye diameter in March). Variation in parturition date was explained largely by fetal development; however, there were up to 16 d of plasticity in expected birth date. Plasticity in expected birth date was shaped by income resources in the form of exposure to spring green-up. Although individuals that experienced greater exposure to spring green-up were able to advance expected birth date, being born early or late with respect to fetal development had no effect on birth mass of offspring. Furthermore, we investigated the trade-offs migrating mule deer face by evaluating support for existing theory that predicts that births should be matched to local peaks in resource availability at the birth site. In contrast to this prediction, only long-distance migrants that paced migration with the flush of spring green-up, giving birth shortly after ending migration, were able to match birth with spring green-up. Shorter-distance migrants completed migration sooner and gave birth earlier, seemingly trading off more time for offspring to grow and develop over greater access to resources. Thus, movement tactic had profound downstream effects on birth timing. These findings highlight a need to reconsider classical theory on optimal birth timing, which has focused solely on conditions at the birth site.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33710647
doi: 10.1002/ecy.3334
pmc: PMC8243980
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e03334Subventions
Organisme : Wyoming Governor's Big Game License Coalition
Organisme : Bowhunters of Wyoming
Organisme : Wyoming Outfitters and Guides Association
Organisme : U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Organisme : U.S. Forest Service
Organisme : National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
Organisme : Pope and Young Club
Organisme : Wyoming Game and Fish Commission
Organisme : Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resources Trust
Organisme : Muley Fanatic Foundation
Organisme : Knobloch Family Foundation
Organisme : Wyoming Animal Damage Management Board
Organisme : U.S. Bureau of Land Management
Organisme : Wyoming Game and Fish Department
Organisme : Boone and Crockett Club
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Ecological Society of America.
Références
J Anim Ecol. 2008 May;77(3):469-77
pubmed: 18312340
Anim Reprod Sci. 2005 Apr;86(3-4):285-96
pubmed: 15766806
Am Nat. 2004 May;163(5):763-72
pubmed: 15122493
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jun 29;283(1833):
pubmed: 27335416
J Anim Ecol. 2011 Mar;80(2):466-76
pubmed: 21105872
J Anim Ecol. 2009 Sep;78(5):1002-6
pubmed: 19426256
Evolution. 2003 Dec;57(12):2879-92
pubmed: 14761065
Nature. 1987 Dec 17-23;330(6149):648-9
pubmed: 3683584
PLoS Biol. 2014 Apr 01;12(4):e1001828
pubmed: 24690936
Am Nat. 1992 Sep;140(3):477-91
pubmed: 19426051
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Sep 28;283(1839):
pubmed: 27655765
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Feb 7;273(1584):293-9
pubmed: 16543171
J Anim Ecol. 2009 Jan;78(1):73-83
pubmed: 18771506
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 9;105(49):19052-9
pubmed: 19060196
Biol Lett. 2015 Aug;11(8):
pubmed: 26246337
Ecology. 2009 Aug;90(8):2057-67
pubmed: 19739368
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Aug;26(8):4215-4225
pubmed: 32524724
J Anim Ecol. 2011 Jan;80(1):4-18
pubmed: 20726924
Reprod Domest Anim. 2018 Dec;53(6):1456-1465
pubmed: 30099784
Ecol Evol. 2015 Jan;5(2):314-25
pubmed: 25691959
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Feb;24(2):823-835
pubmed: 29211325
Ecology. 2021 Jun;102(6):e03334
pubmed: 33710647
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 17;116(51):25707-25713
pubmed: 31754040
Nature. 2010 Jun 3;465(7298):609-12
pubmed: 20520713
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Nov 19;372(1734):
pubmed: 28993494
Science. 1988 May 6;240(4853):798-9
pubmed: 3363360
Am Nat. 2012 Oct;180(4):407-24
pubmed: 22976006
Oecologia. 2001 Apr;127(2):230-238
pubmed: 24577654
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Aug;89(8):1906-1917
pubmed: 32379900
Curr Biol. 2010 Feb 9;20(3):243-8
pubmed: 20116248
Ecol Lett. 2017 Jun;20(6):741-750
pubmed: 28444870