Risk-Benefit Modeling to Guide Health Research in Collaboration with Great Lakes Fish Consuming Native American Communities.
Fish consumption
Native Americans
PUFA-3
mercury
polychlorinated biphenyls
Journal
Journal of Great Lakes research
ISSN: 0380-1330
Titre abrégé: J Great Lakes Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 9882896
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
entrez:
15
3
2021
pubmed:
16
3
2021
medline:
16
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It is well documented that fish consumption imparts both health risks and benefits. Furthermore, fish harvest and consumption are an essential part of Great Lakes Native American cultures. Quantitative models that compare risk and benefits to potential consumption scenarios can help guide future health research as well as consumption advice for potentially sensitive populations. This article presents fish consumption scenarios based on self-reported meal plans constructed by tribal members in eastern upper peninsula and northern lower Michigan Anishinaabe. Two risk-benefit models were applied to these scenarios to estimate the potential neurodevelopmental and cardiovascular risks (either increased or reduced risk) from dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (DL-PCBs), methylmercury (MeHg), and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n3-PUFA). All scenarios except maximum exposure estimates (i.e. 25
Identifiants
pubmed: 33716391
doi: 10.1016/j.jglr.2020.08.003
pmc: PMC7945301
mid: NIHMS1618790
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1702-1708Subventions
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : R01 ES028255
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : R21 ES025788
Pays : United States
Références
Risk Anal. 2018 Oct;38(10):2029-2040
pubmed: 29750842
J Great Lakes Res. 2019 Oct;45(5):969-975
pubmed: 32831463
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1997 Jun;25(3):277-88
pubmed: 9237329
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Aug 29;125(8):085006
pubmed: 28858824
Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Mar;101(3):530-7
pubmed: 25733638
JAMA. 2006 Oct 18;296(15):1885-99
pubmed: 17047219
Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Oct;113(10):1376-80
pubmed: 16203250
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2011 Mar-Apr;33(2):325-8
pubmed: 21145963
J Nutr. 2007 Dec;137(12):2805-8
pubmed: 18029503
Risk Anal. 2000 Feb;20(1):41-7
pubmed: 10795337
Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2018;24(1):242-255
pubmed: 30918437
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Nov 20;46(22):12337-46
pubmed: 23110525
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017;26(5):939-956
pubmed: 28802305
Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Feb;117(2):267-75
pubmed: 19270798
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Nov;29(4):325-34
pubmed: 16242599
J Great Lakes Res. 2018 Jun;44(3):521-526
pubmed: 30270966
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Apr;125(4):495-501
pubmed: 26126293
J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Jul;108(7):1178-85
pubmed: 18589026
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2007 Aug;26(8):1622-8
pubmed: 17702334
JAMA. 1998 Aug 26;280(8):701-7
pubmed: 9728641
N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 28;347(22):1747-54
pubmed: 12456850
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2009 Apr;68(2):109-22
pubmed: 19517871
Environ Res. 2004 Jul;95(3):325-40
pubmed: 15220067
Environ Health Perspect. 2011 Aug;119(8):1043-6
pubmed: 21543281
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Jul 1;44(13):5216-24
pubmed: 20540573
Environ Res. 2007 Feb;103(2):191-7
pubmed: 16890218
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 May 15;167(10):1171-81
pubmed: 18353804
Sci Total Environ. 1991 May 1;104(1-2):97-127
pubmed: 1871593
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Jan;92(1):15-29
pubmed: 28062061