Extended-Release Carvedilol in the Treatment of Hypertension: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Carvedilol
Extended-release formulation
Hypertension
Journal
Acta Cardiologica Sinica
ISSN: 1011-6842
Titre abrégé: Acta Cardiol Sin
Pays: China (Republic : 1949- )
ID NLM: 101687085
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
entrez:
15
3
2021
pubmed:
16
3
2021
medline:
16
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Immediate-release carvedilol requires twice-daily dosing and may have low treatment compliance. We assessed the efficacy of a new formulation of once-daily extended-release carvedilol (carvedilol ER) on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) among patients with hypertension in this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 134 patients with untreated or uncontrolled hypertension were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive placebo, low-dose carvedilol ER, or high-dose carvedilol ER for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the reduction in office SBP at 8 weeks. Secondary endpoints included the reduction in office DBP and the proportion of patients with blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mm Hg. In the intention-to-treat population, placebo-adjusted changes in SBP/DBP were -2.9 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI), -9.6 to 3.7]/-1.7 mm Hg (95% CI, -5.6 to 2.3) and -4.9 mm Hg (95% CI, -11.5 to 1.7)/-3.4 mm Hg (95% CI, -7.3 to 0.5) for low-dose carvedilol ER and high-dose carvedilol ER, respectively. In the per-protocol population, high-dose carvedilol ER was associated with a significant DBP reduction [placebo-adjusted difference, -4.7 mm Hg (95% CI, -8.8 to -0.5); adjusted p = 0.026]. There was a gradational improvement in BP control with carvedilol ER (25%, 37%, and 48% for placebo, low-dose carvedilol ER, and high-dose carvedilol ER, respectively; linear-by-linear association p = 0.028). There were no differences in safety among the three groups. Carvedilol ER, though well tolerated, did not result in a greater reduction in either SBP or DBP compared with placebo.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Immediate-release carvedilol requires twice-daily dosing and may have low treatment compliance. We assessed the efficacy of a new formulation of once-daily extended-release carvedilol (carvedilol ER) on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) among patients with hypertension in this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 134 patients with untreated or uncontrolled hypertension were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive placebo, low-dose carvedilol ER, or high-dose carvedilol ER for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the reduction in office SBP at 8 weeks. Secondary endpoints included the reduction in office DBP and the proportion of patients with blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mm Hg.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In the intention-to-treat population, placebo-adjusted changes in SBP/DBP were -2.9 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI), -9.6 to 3.7]/-1.7 mm Hg (95% CI, -5.6 to 2.3) and -4.9 mm Hg (95% CI, -11.5 to 1.7)/-3.4 mm Hg (95% CI, -7.3 to 0.5) for low-dose carvedilol ER and high-dose carvedilol ER, respectively. In the per-protocol population, high-dose carvedilol ER was associated with a significant DBP reduction [placebo-adjusted difference, -4.7 mm Hg (95% CI, -8.8 to -0.5); adjusted p = 0.026]. There was a gradational improvement in BP control with carvedilol ER (25%, 37%, and 48% for placebo, low-dose carvedilol ER, and high-dose carvedilol ER, respectively; linear-by-linear association p = 0.028). There were no differences in safety among the three groups.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Carvedilol ER, though well tolerated, did not result in a greater reduction in either SBP or DBP compared with placebo.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33716461
doi: 10.6515/ACS.202103_37(2).20200914B
pmc: PMC7953114
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
186-194Références
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006 Dec;8(12):840-9
pubmed: 17170609
Lancet. 2003 Jul 5;362(9377):7-13
pubmed: 12853193
Hypertension. 2015 Feb;65(2):401-6
pubmed: 25403604
N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 10;370(15):1393-401
pubmed: 24678939
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2019 Nov;35(6):553-556
pubmed: 31879505
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;68(18):2016-2025
pubmed: 27788856
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104
pubmed: 30165516
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Oct 2;98(7A):17L-26L
pubmed: 17023228
Lancet. 2001 May 5;357(9266):1385-90
pubmed: 11356434
Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):37-55
pubmed: 27863813
Clin Ther. 2009 Sep;31(9):1946-56
pubmed: 19843484
Clin Ther. 2001 Aug;23(8):1296-310
pubmed: 11558866
JAMA. 2004 Nov 10;292(18):2227-36
pubmed: 15536109
J Hypertens. 2007 Jun;25(6):1105-87
pubmed: 17563527
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;34(1):215-20
pubmed: 15333621
J Chin Med Assoc. 2015 Jan;78(1):1-47
pubmed: 25547819
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2017 May;33(3):213-225
pubmed: 28559651
Circ J. 2012;76(3):668-74
pubmed: 22240593
Heart. 2013 Nov;99(21):1579-87
pubmed: 24038167
N Engl J Med. 2001 May 31;344(22):1651-8
pubmed: 11386263
Lancet. 2014 Aug 16;384(9943):591-598
pubmed: 25131978