The Factors Affecting Expansion of Reactive Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL) From Bladder Cancer and Potential Therapeutic Applications.
Aged
Cancer Vaccines
/ immunology
Cell Proliferation
Cells, Cultured
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Immunotherapy, Adoptive
/ methods
Interleukin-2
/ metabolism
Lymphatic Metastasis
Lymphocyte Activation
Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating
/ physiology
Male
Middle Aged
Mycobacterium bovis
Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily, Member 9
/ agonists
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
/ immunology
Urothelium
/ pathology
Bacillus Calmette–Guerin
adoptive cellular immunotherapy
bladder cancer
molecular subtypes
tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Journal
Frontiers in immunology
ISSN: 1664-3224
Titre abrégé: Front Immunol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560960
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
10
11
2020
accepted:
14
01
2021
entrez:
15
3
2021
pubmed:
16
3
2021
medline:
4
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) therapy was shown to provide durable objective response in patients with metastatic melanoma. As a fundamental first step to bring TIL therapy to clinical use, identification of patients whose tumors yield optimal numbers of reactive TIL is indispensable. We have previously shown that expansion of tumor reactive TIL from primary bladder tumors and lymph node metastases is feasible. Here, we performed TIL harvesting from additional surgical specimens (additional 31 primary tumors and 10 lymph nodes) to generate a heterogenous cohort of 53 patients with bladder cancer (BC) to evaluate the tumor characteristics that lead to tumor-reactive TIL expansion. Among a total of 53 patients, overall TIL growth from tumor samples were 37/53 (69.8%) and overall anti-tumor reactive TIL were 26/35 (74.3%). Mixed urothelial carcinoma is associated with higher anti-tumor reactivity of expanded TIL than pure urothelial carcinoma (89.5% vs. 56.3%, p=0.049). The anti-tumor reactivity of expanded TIL from primary tumors previously treated with BCG immunotherapy were lower (33.3% vs. 82.6%, p=0.027) although T-cell phenotype (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and CD56+) was similar regardless prior of BCG therapy. Addition of agonistic 4-1BB antibody in culture media with IL-2 improved the number of expanded TIL from primary tumors previously treated with BCG immunotherapy. There was no significant difference between basal and luminal subtype tumors in terms of viable and reactive TIL growth. Our study demonstrates that TIL expansion is feasible across all BC patients and BC subtypes, and we suggest that TIL therapy can be a reasonable treatment strategy for various manifestations of BC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33717150
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.628063
pmc: PMC7949015
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cancer Vaccines
0
Interleukin-2
0
Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily, Member 9
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
628063Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K23 CA178083
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA076292
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Aydin, Bunch, Beatty, Hajiran, Dhillon, Sarnaik, Pilon-Thomas and Poch.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Moffitt Cancer Center has licensed Intellectual Property (IP) related to the proliferation and expansion of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) to Iovance Biotherapeutics. SP-T and AS are inventors on such Intellectual Property. SP-T and AS are listed as co-inventors on a patent application with Provectus Biopharmaceuticals. Moffitt has also licensed IP to Tuhura Biopharma, and SP-T is an inventor on such Intellectual Property. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Apr 1;17(7):1664-73
pubmed: 21325070
Oncoimmunology. 2018 Jul 23;7(9):e1476816
pubmed: 30228944
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Jul;8(Suppl 3):S293-S295
pubmed: 31392150
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 1;25(13):3908-3920
pubmed: 30952638
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Oct 3;6(1):102
pubmed: 30285902
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 20;27(27):4454-61
pubmed: 19687335
Eur Urol. 2020 Apr;77(4):439-446
pubmed: 31708296
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 May 1;16(9):2646-55
pubmed: 20406835
EBioMedicine. 2016 Oct;12:105-117
pubmed: 27612592
J Immunother. 2012 Oct;35(8):615-20
pubmed: 22996367
J Urol. 1976 Aug;116(2):180-3
pubmed: 820877
Clin Cancer Res. 1995 May;1(5):501-7
pubmed: 9816009
J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 10;33(14):1543-50
pubmed: 25823737
Lancet. 2016 May 7;387(10031):1909-20
pubmed: 26952546
Am J Surg Pathol. 2011 May;35(5):e34-46
pubmed: 21490442
World J Urol. 2018 Feb;36(2):157-170
pubmed: 29147759
Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):423-432
pubmed: 30213523
J Urol. 2005 Jul;174(1):86-91; discussion 91-2
pubmed: 15947584
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Feb 1;21(3):611-21
pubmed: 25472998
J Clin Invest. 2017 Aug 1;127(8):2916-2929
pubmed: 28650339
Eur Urol. 2020 Apr;77(4):420-433
pubmed: 31563503
J Immunother. 2010 Oct;33(8):840-7
pubmed: 20842052
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34
pubmed: 30620402
Genome Med. 2017 Apr 19;9(1):34
pubmed: 28420421
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Dec 15;18(24):6758-70
pubmed: 23032743
Cancer. 2017 Nov 15;123(22):4346-4355
pubmed: 28743155
Eur Urol. 2020 Jun;77(6):701-710
pubmed: 32165065
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Jul 1;17(13):4550-7
pubmed: 21498393
Cancer Immunol Res. 2017 Jul;5(7):594-603
pubmed: 28588015
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):e341-e353
pubmed: 28593860
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2017 Nov;17(11):1417-1431
pubmed: 28832261
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593