Hamstring origin-anatomy, angle of origin and its possible clinical implications.

Conjoint tendon Hamstrings Semimembranosus Vector angle

Journal

Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
ISSN: 0976-5662
Titre abrégé: J Clin Orthop Trauma
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101559469

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 04 06 2020
revised: 25 08 2020
accepted: 26 08 2020
entrez: 15 3 2021
pubmed: 16 3 2021
medline: 16 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The posterior compartment of the thigh is composed of three major muscles collectively known as the hamstring muscles. These consist of the biceps femoris short and long head, semimembranosus and semitendinosus. Excluding the short head of biceps femoris, the hamstrings contribute to the movement of the hip and the knee joints as they span across both joints. Our hypothesis is that the nature of the conjoint tendon -ischial angle predisposes to an increased risk of tearing in this hamstring component. We therefore aim to look at the anatomy of the hamstring origin at the ischial tuberosity and spatial relationship between the long head of biceps, semitendinosus and semimembranosus in the form of vector angles. 100 consecutive pelvic MRIs in patients under the age of 40 years were reviewed by musculoskeletal radiology fellow and a consultant musculoskeletal radiologist with more than 10 years' experience in musculoskeletal radiology and measured the angle of origin of conjoined tendon and semimembranosus at its ischial origin. P value using a paired The median angle of origin of conjoined tendon was 12° and for semimembranosus was 6°. Applying the concept of Newton's second law to the angles calculated we demonstrated that an increase of 9% force applied to the conjoint tendon origin when compared to the semimembranosus tendon. We hypothesis that the difference in the angle of origin of the components of hamstrings might be one of the reasons for the difference in the incidence and patterns of the injuries of the various muscles of the hamstrings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33717874
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.08.021
pii: S0976-5662(20)30406-9
pmc: PMC7920124
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

50-52

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© 2020 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Références

J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Apr;19(4):317-22
pubmed: 25921622
J Athl Train. 2012 Jul-Aug;47(4):390-5
pubmed: 22889654
J Biomech. 1991;24 Suppl 1:111-22
pubmed: 1791172
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2005 Nov;13(4):677-90, vi
pubmed: 16275576
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Dec;179(6):1621-8
pubmed: 12438066
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Sep;23(9):2576-82
pubmed: 24929658
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Jul;23(7):2115-22
pubmed: 24190369
Int J Sports Med. 2011 Mar;32(3):211-5
pubmed: 21072742
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Feb;174(2):393-9
pubmed: 10658712

Auteurs

C Azzopardi (C)

Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

G Almeer (G)

Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

J Kho (J)

Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

D Beale (D)

Department of Radiology, Heath Lodge Clinic, Knowle, UK.

S L James (SL)

Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

R Botchu (R)

Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

Classifications MeSH